| Literature DB >> 31293502 |
Haiyan Zhu1, Wenxiao Wang2,3, He Li3,4, Kewei Chen5, Peng Li6, Xin Li2,3, Junying Zhang3,4, Dongfeng Wei3,4, Yaojing Chen2,3.
Abstract
To investigate the alterations of basal ganglia (BG)-cortical structural and functional connectivity induced by subcortical silent lacunar infarct (SLI), and their associations with cognitive impairment in SLI subjects. All participants were recruited from communities, including 30 subcortical SLIs and 30 age-, gender-, and education-matched healthy controls. The structural and functional connectivity of BG-cortical circuits using diffusion and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained. Diffusion abnormalities of the white matter tracts connecting the BG and cortical areas were observed in SLI subjects, including the BG-lateral frontal, BG-orbital frontal, and BG-insula tracts. Multiple regions showed a reduced BG-cortical functional connectivity in SLI patients, including direct connectivities with the BG, such as the BG-limbic, BG-insula, and BG-frontal connectivities, and others that showed no direct causation with the BG, such as the insula-limbic, insula-parietal, and frontal-parietal connectivities. Coupling of structural and functional BG-cortical connectivity was observed in healthy controls but not in SLI patients. Significant correlations between structural and functional BG-cortical connectivity and cognitive performance were demonstrated in SLI patients, indicating the potential use of BG-cortical connectivities as MRI biomarkers to assess cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that subcortical SLIs can impair BG-cortical circuits, and these changes may be the pathological basis of cognitive impairment in SLI patients.Entities:
Keywords: basal ganglia-cortical circuit; cognition; functional connectivity; silent lacunar infarct; structural connectivity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31293502 PMCID: PMC6603169 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Demographic and neuropsychological measurements.
| Age | 65.96 ± 6.17 | 63.53 ± 6.10 | 1.951 | 0.056 |
| Women (%) | 10 (33.3%) | 18 (60%) | 4.286 | 0.069 |
| Education | 12.10 ± 3.30 | 10.56 ± 2.73 | 1.142 | 0.258 |
| Hypertention (%) | 9(30%) | 6(20%) | 0.800 | 0.552 |
| Smoking | ||||
| non/past/current | 24/1/5 | 27/0/3 | 1.676 | 0.241 |
| MMSE | 26.43 ± 2.37 | 27.93 ± 1.55 | −2.897 | 0.005 |
| AVLT-delay recall | 3.50 ± 2.77 | 5.10 ± 2.00 | −2.559 | 0.013 |
| AVLT- total | 22.03 ± 9.9 | 29.16 ± 7.18 | −3.194 | 0.002 |
| ROCF-delay recall | 12.73 ± 8.53 | 13.20 ± 5.28 | −0.255 | 0.799 |
| Digit Span | 11.77 ± 2.31 | 11.70 ± 2.12 | 0.116 | 0.908 |
| ROCF-Copy | 32.50 ± 5.66 | 33.53 ± 2.62 | −0.906 | 0.369 |
| CDT | 24.06 ± 4.14 | 24.56 ± 3.78 | −0.488 | 0.627 |
| CVFT | 40.30 ± 9.48 | 45.70 ± 11.53 | −1.980 | 0.052 |
| BNT | 24.06 ± 3.52 | 24.13 ± 3.53 | −0.073 | 0.942 |
| SDMT | 30.83 ± 12.79 | 37.86 ± 9.55 | −2.413 | 0.019 |
| SCWT-B Time(s) | 44.66 ± 13.37 | 38.50 ± 9.48 | 2.061 | 0.044 |
| TMT-A time (s) | 65.60 ± 26.51 | 61.80 ± 25.06 | 0.571 | 0.571 |
| SCWT C-B Time(s) | 40.63 ± 23.11 | 41.83 ± 26.43 | −0.187 | 0.852 |
| TMT-B time(s) | 192.83 ± 71.06 | 188.83 ± 63.54 | 0.230 | 0.819 |
Values are mean ± SD or Nos. of participants (percentage). The comparisons of neuropsychological scores between the two groups were performed with independent two-sample t-tests.
The p value for gender, hypertension and smoking ratio were obtained using a Chi-square test.
MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ROCF, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test; TMT, Trail Making Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SCWT, Stroop Color and Word Test; CDT, Clock-Drawing Test; CVFT, Category Verbal Fluency Test; BNT, Boston Naming Test.
Figure 1Comparison of structural BG-cortical connectivity between SLI patients and controls. White matter tracts connecting the BG to the lateral frontal area and orbital frontal cortex in the left hemisphere and to the lateral frontal area and insula in the right hemisphere are represented in a 3D brain model. The bar charts show the average FA ± SEM within each tract compared between SLI patients (orange) and controls (blue). BG, basal ganglia; SLI, silent lacunar infarct; FA, fractional anisotropy; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 2Altered BG-cortical functional connectivities in SLI patients. (A) Mean functional connectivity in SLI and HC groups. The Color bar indicates the correlation values for each region pair. (B) Differences between SLI and HC in BG-cortical connectivity. Color bar indicates altered functional connectivity values (SLI minus HC) for each region pair. Blue cells represent significant correlation differences between ROIs (t-test, FDR-corrected, q < 0.05). (C) Brain map representation with altered correlations in the BG-cortical network. Significantly decreased connections in SLI patients are shown. There were no increased connections observed in SLI patients. BG, basal ganglia; SLI, silent lacunar infarct; FA, fractional anisotropy; HC, healthy control, FDR, false discovery rate; ROI, regions of interest.
Structural and functional BG-cortical connectivity correlations.
| White matter integrity | BG-Lateral Frontal.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | ||||||||
| BG-Lateral Frontal.R | SLI | |||||||
| HC | ||||||||
| BG-Insul.R | SLI | |||||||
| HC | ||||||||
Cau.head, Caudate head; Tha, Thalamus (medial dorsal nucleus); RN, Red nucleus; TMT, Trail Making Test; MFG, Middle frontal gyrus; INS, Insula; IFG, Inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, Inferior parietal lobule; L, Left hemisphere; R, Right hemisphere; BA, Brodmann area. Bold values indicate Functional connectivity.
Correlation between BG-cortical connectivity and cognitive function.
| White matter integrity | BG-Lateral Frontal.L | SLI | |||||
| HC | |||||||
| BG-Insul.R | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| Functional connectivity | Cau.head.L-RN.R | SLI | |||||
| HC | |||||||
| Cau.head.L-Tha.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| Cau.head.R-Tha.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| RN.R-CG.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| RN.R-PreCG.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| RN.R-MFG.BA46.R | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| Tha.L-CG.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| INS.L- INS.R | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| INS.L-CG.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| INS.L-IPL.R | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
| MFG.BA9.R2-IPL.L | SLI | ||||||
| HC | |||||||
MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SCWT, Stroop Color and Word Test; Cau.head, Caudate head; Tha, Thalamus (medial dorsal nucleus); RN, Red nucleus; TMT, Trail Making Test; MFG, Middle frontal gyrus; INS, Insula; IFG, Inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, Inferior parietal lobule; L, Left hemisphere; R, Right hemisphere; BA, Brodmann area. Bold values indicate Functional connectivity.