| Literature DB >> 31293496 |
Jie Li1, Yuhan Duan1, Deming Zhao1, Syed Zahid Ali Shah2, Wei Wu1, Xixi Zhang1, Mengyu Lai1, Zhiling Guan1, Dongming Yang1, Xiaoqian Wu1, Hongli Gao1, Huafen Zhao1, Qi Shi3, Lifeng Yang1.
Abstract
Background: The current diagnosis method for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is post-mortem examination, so early detection of CJD has been historically problematic. Auxiliary detection of CJD based on changes in levels of components of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has become a focus of research. In other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), cell-free mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in the CSF of patients may serve as a biomarker that could facilitate early diagnosis and studies of the mechanisms underlying the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; cerebrospinal fluid; diagnosis; mtDNA; prion disease
Year: 2019 PMID: 31293496 PMCID: PMC6598448 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Cerebrospinal fluid sample background information.
| 1 | Male | 56 | + | – | + | + | – | – | 1,3,4 | + | sCJD |
| 2 | Female | 67 | + | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | + | sCJD |
| 3 | Male | 40 | + | + | – | – | + | + | 1,2,5,6 | + | sCJD |
| 4 | Female | 58 | – | – | – | + | – | + | 4,6 | + | sCJD |
| 5 | Female | 79 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1,2,3,4,5,6 | – | sCJD |
| 6 | Female | 57 | + | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | sCJD |
| 7 | male | 43 | + | – | + | + | – | + | 1,3,4,6 | + | sCJD |
| 8 | Male | 55 | + | + | + | + | + | – | 1,2,3,4,5 | + | sCJD |
| 9 | Female | 65 | + | – | + | + | – | – | 1,3,4 | + | sCJD |
| 10 | Male | 52 | + | + | – | – | + | – | 1,2,5 | + | sCJD |
| 11 | Female | 62 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1,2,3,4,5 | + | sCJD |
| 12 | Male | 71 | + | + | + | + | – | – | 1,2,3,4 | + | sCJD |
| 13 | Female | 57 | + | + | + | – | – | – | 1,2,3 | + | sCJD |
| 14 | Male | 51 | + | – | + | + | – | – | 1,3,4 | + | sCJD |
| 15 | Male | 64 | + | + | – | + | – | + | 1,2,4,6 | + | sCJD |
| 16 | Female | 63 | – | + | – | + | + | – | 2,4,5 | + | sCJD |
| 17 | Male | 72 | + | + | – | + | + | – | 1,2,4,5 | + | sCJD |
| 18 | Female | 71 | + | + | – | + | + | – | 1,2,4,5 | + | sCJD |
| 19 | Male | 66 | + | + | + | – | – | + | 1,2,3,6 | + | sCJD |
| 20 | Female | 54 | + | + | – | + | + | + | 1,2,4,5,6 | + | sCJD |
| 21 | Male | 62 | + | – | – | – | + | – | 1,5 | – | non-CJD |
| 22 | male | 44 | + | – | – | + | – | – | 1,4 | – | non-CJD |
| 23 | Female | 50 | – | – | + | + | – | + | 3,4,6 | – | non-CJD |
| 24 | Male | 47 | – | – | – | – | – | – | / | – | non-CJD |
| 25 | Male | 65 | + | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | non-CJD |
| 26 | Female | 76 | + | – | – | + | – | – | 1,4 | – | non-CJD |
| 27 | Female | 62 | + | + | – | – | – | – | 1,2 | – | non-CJD |
| 28 | Female | 56 | + | – | + | – | – | – | 1,3 | – | non–CJD |
| 29 | Male | 45 | – | – | – | – | – | + | 6 | – | non-CJD |
| 30 | Male | 73 | + | + | – | – | – | – | 1,2 | – | non-CJD |
| 31 | Female | 52 | – | – | – | – | – | + | 6 | – | non-CJD |
| 32 | Male | 70 | + | – | – | + | – | – | 1,4 | – | non-CJD |
| 33 | Female | 55 | – | – | – | + | – | – | 4 | – | non-CJD |
“1” represent “Rapid progressive dementia,” “2” represent “Myoclonus,” “3” represent “Visual or cerebellar symptoms,” “4” represent “Pyramids/Extrapyramidal dysfunction,” “5” represent “akinetic mutism,” “6” represent “other symptoms.” “/” represent “inexistence,” “Other symptoms” include paroxysmal convulsions, disturbance of consciousness, convulsions, slow progressive dementia, psychiatric symptoms, subacute progressive dementia, dual vision, cortical blindness, numbness of the right limb, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, memory loss, cerebellar symptoms. “+” represent “exist,” “–” represent “inexistence.”
Figure 1(A) The mitochondrial DNA copy number of the CSF of the control group (n = 13) and patients with sCJD (n = 21). Subjects were divided into the following groups: possible sCJD patients (black bar) and non-CJD subjects (gray bar). The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. The mtDNA copy number of the CSF is expressed as mtDNA copies/20 μL. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, represents the sCJD group are significantly different from the control group, by unpaired t-test. (B) mitochondrial DNA copy numbers of the CSF of sCJD patients/non-patients of different ages. The correlation between age and the cell-free mitochondrial DNA copy number of the CSF was assessed for the experimental and control groups (a,b). There was no correlation between age and disease, By liner regression graph and pearson correlation analysis.
Figure 2Copies of mtDNA in CSF and correlation with gender. (A) The mitochondrial DNA copy number of the male sCJD patients was significantly higher than that of the control group. (B) The mitochondrial DNA copy number of the female sCJD patients (n = 11) was higher than that of the control group (n = 10), but this difference was not significant. (C) In the control group, the cell-free mitochondrial DNA copy number of female patients (n = 6) was higher than that of male patients (n = 7), but this difference was not significant. (D) Among sCJD patients, the mitochondrial DNA copy number of male patients was higher than that of female patients, but this difference was not significant. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. The mtDNA copy number of the CSF is expressed as mtDNA copies/20 μL. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, represents the MsCJD group are significantly different from the control group, by unpaired t-test.
Figure 3The correlation between clinical symptoms and the cell-free mitochondrial DNA copy number of the CSF was analyzed for the experimental and control groups. The CSF mitochondrial DNA copy number was not found to be related to CJD symptoms. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. The mtDNA copy number of the CSF is expressed as mtDNA copies/20 μL. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, represents the sCJD group are significantly different from the control group, by unpaired t-test.