| Literature DB >> 31293281 |
D Vanham1, B M Gawlik1, G Bidoglio1.
Abstract
During the last years, the city of Hong Kong has made large investments to make its urban water supply system more water efficient and sustainable. As such, its municipal water abstraction - often defined as direct water use - has decreased from 355 litre per capita per day (l/cap/d) in 2005 to 326 l/cap/d in 2013. Due to its political history, Hong Kong is unique in the world in data availability on urban food consumption. It is therefore the ideal case study to show typical urban food consumption behaviour and its related indirect water use. The objective of this paper is to show the large water quantities associated with indirect water use and that the citizens of Hong Kong can additionally save much more water by looking at this indirect water use. The current average diet in Hong Kong is very different to the average Chinese diet. It is characterised by a high intake of water intensive products like animal products and sugar, leading to a food related indirect water use or water footprint (WFcons) of 4727 l/cap/d. According to recommendations from the Chinese Nutrition Society for a healthy diet, the intake of some product groups should be increased (vegetables and fruit) and of other product groups reduced (sugar, crop oils, meat and animal fats). This would result in a reduction of the WFcons of 40% to 2852 l/cap/d. Especially the reduced intake of meat (including offals) from currently 126 kg per capita per year (kg/cap/yr) to the recommended value 27 kg/cap/yrwould results in a substantial WFcons reduction. Meat consumption in Hong Kong is extremely high. A pesco-vegetarian diet would result in a reduction of 49% (to 2398 l/cap/d) and a vegetarian diet in a 53% (to 2224 l/cap/d) reduction. Hong Kong citizens can thus save a lot of water through a change in their diet. Many of the products consumed, contribute to different levels of blue water scarcity in the regions of origin Hong Kong imports from. This poses a water-related risk to food security in Hong Kong. As all diet scenarios also result in a lower blue WFcons, they decrease this risk. In order to become sustainable, (mega)cities should reduce their dependency on distant resources and ecosystems.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31293281 PMCID: PMC6588220 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hydrol (Amst) ISSN: 0022-1694 Impact factor: 5.722
Abbreviations used in this study.
| Abbreviation | Definition |
|---|---|
| SDGs | Sustainable Development Goals |
| HKSAR | Hong Kong Special Administration Region |
| WHO | World health Organisation |
| FAO | Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations |
| FBS | Food balance Sheets |
| WF | Water footprint |
| WFN | Water Footprint Network |
| WFprod | Water footprint of production |
| WFcons | Water footprint of consumption |
| gn | green (e.g. as in WFcons, gn) |
| bl | blue (e.g. as in WFcons, bl) |
| gn + bl | green + blue (e.g. as in WFcons, gn+bl) |
| WS | Water stress |
| REF | The reference period, 1996–2005 |
| HEALTHY | Healthy diet scenario |
| PESCO-VEG | Pesco-vegetarian diet scenario |
| VEG | Vegetarian diet scenario |
| FBDG | Food based dietary recommendations |
| l/cap/d | Litres per capita per day |
| EFR | Environmental flow requirement |
Fig. 1Workflow scheme of the methodology used in this study. Diet scenarios are based upon the Chinese dietary guidelines (Chinese Nutrition Society, 2015), as displayed in the Chinese food guide pagoda (Values per capita per day).
Food supply, food consumption and food intake amounts for Hong Kong for the different product groups, reference period.
| Food supply (kg/cap/yr) | corr1 | Food consumption (retail product) | corr2 | Food intake | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals | 106.3 | 94.3 | 0.9 | 84.9 | |
| of which wheat | 49.5 | 0.8 | 39.6 | 0.9 | 35.6 |
| of which rice | 51.0 | 1 | 51.0 | 0.9 | 45.9 |
| of which others | 5.8 | 0.63–0.75 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 3.4 |
| Starchy roots | 25.2 | 25.2 | 0.9 | 22.7 | |
| of which potatoes | 23.8 | 1 | 23.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| of which others | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 21.5 |
| Sugar | 36.9 | 1 | 36.9 | 0.95 | 34.9 |
| Crop oils | 11.0 | 1 | 11.0 | 0.95 | 10.5 |
| Vegetables | 111.9 | 1 | 111.9 | 0.9 | 100.7 |
| Fruit | 87.1 | 1 | 87.1 | 0.94 | 81.9 |
| Pulses, nuts and oilcrops | 20.4 | 1 | 20.4 | 0.95 | 19.3 |
| Meat | 154.2 | 110.4 | 0.93 | 102.7 | |
| of which pork | 62.6 | 0.7 | 43.8 | 0.93 | 40.8 |
| of which beef | 25.1 | 0.8 | 20.1 | 0.93 | 18.7 |
| of which poultry | 61.4 | 0.7 | 43.0 | 0.93 | 40.0 |
| of which other meat | 5.1 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 0.93 | 3.3 |
| Offals edible | 24.5 | 1 | 24.5 | 0.93 | 22.8 |
| Fish and seafood | 62.9 | 0.5 | 31.4 | 0.92 | 28.9 |
| of which fish | 36.4 | 0.5 | 18.2 | 0.92 | 16.7 |
| of which shellfish | 27.7 | 0.5 | 13.6 | 0.92 | 12.5 |
| Animal fats | 6.6 | 1 | 6.6 | 0.95 | 6.3 |
| Milk and milk products | 95.2 | 1 | 95.2 | 0.95 | 90.5 |
| Eggs | 14.0 | 1 | 14.0 | 0.95 | 13.3 |
| Stimulants | 6.3 | 1 | 6.3 | 0.95 | 6.0 |
| Spices | 1.0 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 0.9 |
| Alcoholic Beverages | 30.0 | 1 | 30.0 | 0.95 | 28.5 |
Values based on (FAO, 1972, Vanham et al., 2013a, Westhoek, et al., 2011).
Source: for pork and beef (Hong Kong Statistics, 2003); for poultry and other meat (Westhoek et al., 2011).
Source (FAO, 1989) – http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/t0219e/t0219e01.htm.
The value 1 is valid for milk, yoghurt and cream. The conversion factor for cheese is different from 1 (Vanham et al., 2013a), but as cheese is consumed in neglectable quantities in Hong Kong, this is not taken into account.
Literature and chosen values for food waste at the consumer level for the different product groups. With HH CH = households China; CA BEI = Catering in Beijing; CA LHA = Catering in Lhasa; CO CH = total consumption China (households and catering); CO EU = total consumption EU (households and catering).
| Literature values on food waste for different product groups | Chosen value | |
|---|---|---|
| Cereals and potatoes | ( | 10% |
| Sugar | sugar HH CH 5% ( | 5% |
| Crop oils | Vegetable oils HH CH 37% ( | 5% |
| Vegetables | vegetables HH CH 7% ( | 10% |
| Fruit | fruit HH CH 6% ( | 6% |
| Pulses, nuts and oilcrops | legumes HH CH 2% ( | 5% |
| Meat | ( | 7% |
| Offals edible | 7% | |
| Fish and seafood | aquatic products HH CH 8% ( | 8% |
| Animal fats | Animal fats CO EU 5% ( | 5% |
| Milk and milk products | milk HH CH 0.3% ( | 5% |
| Eggs | eggs HH CH 2% ( | 5% |
| Stimulants | stimulants CO EU 5–10% ( | 5% |
| Spices | spices CO EU 5–10% ( | 5% |
| Alcoholic Beverages | Liquor CA LHA 10% ( | 5% |
Chosen food product intake values for HEALTHY, based upon Chinese FBDG (Chinese Nutrition Society, 2015) and a – based upon population statistics (Hong Kong Statistics, 2015a) – computed average energy intake of 2122 kcal/cap/d. Source for sugar: (WHO, 2003). Source for alcohol: (Hong Kong Department of Health, 2013).
| HEALTHY recommended amounts | ||
|---|---|---|
| g/cap/d | kg/cap/yr | |
| Cereals, rice, potatoes | 325 | 118.6 |
| Sugar | Max 60 | Max 21.9 |
| Vegetables | 375 | 136.9 |
| Fruit | 300 | 109.5 |
| Pulses, nuts and oilcrops | 40 | 14.6 |
| Meat | 75 | 27.4 |
| Offals | Included in meat | |
| Fish and seafood | Fish and shrimp 75 | 27.4 |
| Animal fats and crop oils | 25 | 9.1 |
| Milk and milk products | 300 | 109.5 |
| Eggs | 40 | 14.6 |
| Stimulants | No specific recommendations | |
| Spices | No specific recommendations | |
| Alcoholic Beverages | Max 20 pure alcohol for men (2 standard drinks) and max 10 pure alcohol for women (1 standard drink) | Max 7.3 pure alcohol for men (2 standard drinks) and max 3.7 pure alcohol for women (1 standard drink) |
Fig. 2Direct water use Hong Kong: (Top) Per capita municipal and domestic water abstraction/withdrawal in l/cap/d; (Bottom) Total population and population served with fresh water (in million). Data source: (Hong Kong Water Supplies Department, 2015).
Fig. 3(Above) Food intake in Hong Kong (in kg/cap/yr) for REF and the three scenarios; (Bottom) The green + blue WF of consumption for edible agricultural products (WFcons, gn+bl of food) (in l/cap/d) of Hong Kong for REF and the three scenarios. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Reference and scenario food intake values per product group in terms of weight (kg/yr), energy (kcal/d), protein (g/d) and fat (g/d). All values per capita. Total 1 = basic food groups; total 2 = total 1 + other food.
| Product group | Weight (kg/yr) | Energy (kcal/d) | Protein (g/d) | Fats (g/d) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REF | HEALTHY | PESCO-VEG | VEG | REF | HEALTHY | PESCO-VEG | VEG | REF | HEALTHY | PESCO-VEG | VEG | REF | HEALTHY | PESCO-VEG | VEG | |
| Cereals, potatoes | 107.6 | 118.6 | 118.6 | 118.6 | 865 | 954 | 954 | 954 | 16.9 | 18.6 | 18.6 | 18.6 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| Sugar | 34.9 | 21.9 | 21.9 | 21.9 | 301 | 189 | 189 | 189 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Crop oils | 10.5 | 5.7 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 252 | 137 | 219 | 219 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 28.5 | 15.5 | 24.8 | 24.8 |
| Vegetables | 100.7 | 136.9 | 136.9 | 136.9 | 108 | 146 | 146 | 146 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Fruit | 81.9 | 109.5 | 109.5 | 109.5 | 84 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Pulses, nuts, oilcrops | 19.3 | 14.6 | 35.1 | 41.4 | 171 | 129 | 301 | 383 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 17.2 | 29.0 | 12.9 | 9.7 | 11.2 | 18.1 |
| Meat | 102.7 | 22.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 697 | 152 | 0 | 0 | 46.2 | 10.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.2 | 12.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offals, edible | 22.8 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 69 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 11.3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Animal fats | 6.3 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 110 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.3 | 9.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Fish and seafood | 28.9 | 27.4 | 27.4 | 0.0 | 87 | 83 | 83 | 0 | 14.4 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 |
| Milk and milk products | 90.5 | 109.5 | 109.5 | 109.5 | 164 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 8.0 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 6.9 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Eggs | 13.3 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 53 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Stimulants | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Alcoholic beverages | 28.5 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Spices | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Fig. 4(Above) The blue WF of consumption for edible agricultural products (WFcons, bl of food) (in l/cap/d) of Hong Kong for REF and the three scenarios; (Bottom) The green WF of consumption for edible agricultural products (WFcons, gn of food) (in l/cap/d) of Hong Kong for REF and the three scenarios. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Food items in the Hong Kong diet with high WFcons, bl amounts. Reference population of 6737 * 103 people (average of 1996–2005).
| Food item | WFcons, bl | Main countries of import | Annual average of monthly blue water scarcity (WS) for grid cells where food item is produced (with irrigation), national average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| l/cap/d | km3/yr | (% of total volume) | ||
| Wheat | 57 | 0.140 | 64% China | China 2.4, according to WFprod, bl database for wheat of ( |
| Rice (milled eq.) | 62 | 0.152 | 55% Thailand, 30% Vietnam, 9.2% China, 1.4% Australia, 1.1% USA | Thailand 3.2, Vietnam 2.0, China 1.5, Australia 4.8, USA 1.4, according to WFprod, bl database for rice of ( |
| Sugar (Raw Equivalent) | 36 | 0.088 | All sugar from sugarcane assumed. Sugar from Rep. of Korea originates from Australia | Australia 3.6, according to WFprod, bl database for sugarcane of ( |
| Tree nuts | 157 | 0.385 | 20% USA pistachios, 17% USA almonds and 28% USA other nuts, 18% Rep. of Iran pistachios, 18% worldwide nut mix | USA almonds 3.5, USA pistachios 4.2, Rep. of Iran pistachios 3.0, according to the crop production database for almonds and pistachios of ( |
| Oranges, Mandarines | 9 | 0.021 | 20% South Africa, 54% USA, 11% Australia | South Africa 3.8, USA 4.0, Australia 5.4, according to the crop production database for oranges of ( |
| Grapes and products (excl wine) | 14 | 0.035 | 39% Chile, 26% USA | Australia 4.9, Chile 1.2, USA 1.4, France 0.3, according to the crop production database grapes of ( |
| Wine | 13 | 0.032 | 32% France, 15% Australia, 13% USA | |
| Bovine Meat | 19 | 0.048 | 38% Brazil, 28% USA | Maize and soybeans as feed crops are taken as proxy for the WFprod,bl of these livestock products in countries of orgin. It is assumed that feed crops are produced in these countries themselves. |
| Pigmeat | 64 | 0.158 | 24% China, 18% Brazil, 9% Spain, 8% USA, 8% Germany | |
| Poultry Meat | 32 | 0.079 | 28% Brazil, 32% USA | |
| Offals | 9 | 0.022 | Offals cattle (35% of all offals) 65% Brazil, Offals pigs (63% of all offals) 25% Germany, 17% USA | |
| Eggs | 7 | 0.018 | 59% China, 23% USA | |
| Milk | 21 | 0.052 | 23% Netherlands, 15% China, 13% Australia | |
| Freshwater Fish | 71 | 0.175 | No data | High value due to pond evaporation and feed input |
| Demersal, pelagic and other marine fish | 16 | 0.038 | No data | Only feed input |
| Remaining food items | 47 | 0.115 | ||
| All products | 634 | 1.558 | ||
Fig. 5Annual average of monthly blue water scarcity (WS), according to (Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2016), in grid cells where rice has a blue WF, according to data from (Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2011). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6Identification of WS hot spots: High values in the annual average of monthly blue water scarcity (WS) (Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2016), for food items with a high WFcons,bl Hong Kong imports. These food items are wheat, rice, sugarcane, specific tree nuts (pistachios and almonds), oranges, grapes, and maize and soybeans as proxy for livestock products. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)