Literature DB >> 31292495

The composition of the aphid fauna (Insecta, Hemiptera) of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Karina Wieczorek1, Tim K Fulcher2, Dominik Chłond3.   

Abstract

At least a dozen species of aphids (Insecta, Hemiptera) of non-native origin have expanded their range in Europe, however the importance of botanic gardens in this phenomenon has not been studied previously in detail. As a case study, investigations on the species composition and host range of Aphidomorpha in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom, were conducted over a period of twelve days, in June 2017. The inventory study was carried out in the collection of living plants, both in the gardens and the glasshouses and nurseries. In total, 94 taxa of Aphidomorpha are identified (one phylloxerid, one adelgid and 92 species of aphids). 20 species are regarded as alien to the European aphid fauna and among them nine are believed to be the first published records for Kew. 20 species are regarded as serious pests, capable of virus transmission. The list of host plants includes 155 taxa from 89 genera and 49 families. Ericolophium holsti (Takahashi), species of Asiatic origin associated with Rhododendron spp., was found for the first time in the field in the UK. Changes in the species composition of the aphid fauna in reference to the Eastop's studies in 1960s were discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31292495      PMCID: PMC6620339          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46441-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Aphids, and closely related phylloxerids and adelgids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphidomorpha), are one of the most important groups of pests on cultivated and ornamental plants in the temperate regions. Possible effects include weakening and distortion of host plants, decreased growth rates, secretion of large amounts of honeydew and the transfer of plant viruses[1,2]. The fight against these insects is difficult due to their biology – holocyclic or, in some species, anholocyclic (i.e. without sexual phase) mode of reproduction and extremely high female fecundity (e.g. the peach-potato aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer)[3] or the soybean aphid Aphis glycines Matsumura[4]). Another important feature is the host alternation: the presence of various generations in one season, including winged morphs responsible for dispersal and locating secondary (or new) hosts[2]. Intraspecific variation (e.g. in expression of sexuality in the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi L.[5]), the way in which foraging affects the physiology of the plants infested (including the influence of virus-induced changes[6]) and the observed lack of susceptibility to some insecticides[7], are additional factors, which have enabled aphids to exploit their food-plants. The species of non-native origin play a special role, especially in new areas, and under favourable conditions can become invasive[8,9] or can attack native[10] or endemic plants[11]. As many as 102 alien aphid species have been reported in Europe[12]. However, this number is continuously changing due to the increasing globalization of trade in plants and plant material, together with climate change[13,14]. Consequently, it leads to an increase in the introduction and spread of new and damaging plant pests and pathogens, causing serious losses in plant production[15-19]. On the other hand, the distribution of these insects is limited by the presence of the host plants, i.e. the alien aphids are absent where the host plant does not occur. Some alien aphids were introduced with the exotic host[20,21], thus, these (at least in some cases), are restricted to artificial habitats such as botanic gardens, greenhouses, parks and gardens in city areas. Among them, botanic gardens are classified as the oldest form of urban greenery, covering all aspects of plant conservation policy, practice and education and characterized by high plant diversity[22]. At the same time, botanic gardens are a small but significant part of the invasive plant problem[23-26]. However, their role in the spread of an organism as closely associated with the host plant as Aphidomorha, has not been sufficiently studied. Created in 1759, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Kew), across its 132 hectares, grows one of the largest and most diverse living plant collections in the world. This is London’s largest UNESCO World Heritage Site, designated in 2003, with more than 100,000 living plants. These represent numerous and diverse plant families with extensive collections of trees, herbaceous, alpine and economic plants from most parts of the world, located in distinctive areas and glasshouses, and as such is an excellent target for collecting Aphidomorpha. The first list of aphids, collected by Laing in Kew, was published in 1920[27]. Later, in 1962 and 1965, further contributions to the aphid fauna of Kew were published by Eastop[28,29]. The first list brings the total number of aphids known from Kew to 91 taxa, the second one comprised 77 taxa. In total, over four years of collecting (1958, 1960, 1961 and 1962), 142 taxa of aphids were listed. Some of them were marked as introduced or even as a first record for Europe. With a few minor exceptions[30-32], further intensive studies on the aphid fauna of Kew have not been carried out. The aim of the paper is to ascertain the number of Aphidomorpha species infesting plants in Kew and see how the aphid fauna has changed since Eastop’s research 60 years ago. Moreover, it will allow identification of non-native species and whether the number of introductions of aliens has changed. It will also determine the number of economically important species of aphids.

Results

The composition of the Aphidomorpha fauna of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

A total of 221 aphid samples were collected during the twelve days in Kew. In total, 94 taxa of Aphidomorpha were identified. Adelgidae and Phylloxeridae were represented by a single species each, whereas there were 92 taxa from Aphididae (species and subspecies) belonging to nine subfamilies: Eriosomatinae, Anoeciinae, Mindarinae, Drepanosiphinae, Phyllaphidinae, Calaphidinae, Chaitophorinae, Aphidinae and Lachninae. Aphidinae, the most numerous subfamily, was represented by 20 genera and 44 species. The richest genus represented in the collection was Aphis Linnaeus (11 species). The subfamily Calaphidinae (21 species) was most frequently represented by species belonging to the tribe Panaphidini (14 species). The fewest species in Aphididae were from the subfamilies Anoeciinae, Mindarinae, Drepanosiphinae and Phyllaphidinae. In only seven locations surveyed (Aquatic Garden, Duke’s Garden, Lake, Mediterranean Garden, Pond, Rhododendron Dell, Redwood Grove) the number of species was the same as the number of samples collected. In other locations, the number of samples was slightly higher than the number of species, the highest in the Populus collection (5 species and 14 samples). The two richest locations for aphid species and samples were the Arboretum Nursery (15 species and 17 samples) and the Plant Family Beds (12 species and 16 samples). In other locations, from 1 to 10 species (Fig. 1) and 1 to 14 samples were found. In these locations, all samples were collected in outdoor conditions, except for a few samples collected in a greenhouses in Arboretum Nursery or Tropical Nursery. In contrast, in indoor conditions in the Palm House, Water Lily House, Princess of Wales Conservatory or Davies Alpine House no samples were collected.
Figure 1

Collecting area and the number of collected species. The abbreviations denote as follow: (1) AColl. – Acer spp. collection; (2) ARBN – Arboretum Nursery; (3) BColl. – Betula spp. collection; (4) PColl. – Populus spp. collection; (5) QColl. – Quercus spp. collection; (6) AG – Aquatic Garden; (7) BG – Bamboo Garden; (8) DG – Duke’s Garden; (9) JG – Japanese Garden; (10) L – Lake; (11) MG – Mediterranean Garden; (12) NO – near Orangery; (13) P – Pond; (14) PFB – Plant Family Beds; (15) Pi – Pinetum; (16) RD – Rhododendron Dell; (17) RG – Rock Garden; (18) RK – Royals Kitchen; (19) ReG – Redwood Grove; (20) RoG – Rose Garden; (21) SVP – Student Vegetables Plot; (22) TRON – Tropical Nursery.

Collecting area and the number of collected species. The abbreviations denote as follow: (1) AColl. – Acer spp. collection; (2) ARBN – Arboretum Nursery; (3) BColl. – Betula spp. collection; (4) PColl. – Populus spp. collection; (5) QColl. – Quercus spp. collection; (6) AG – Aquatic Garden; (7) BG – Bamboo Garden; (8) DG – Duke’s Garden; (9) JG – Japanese Garden; (10) L – Lake; (11) MG – Mediterranean Garden; (12) NO – near Orangery; (13) P – Pond; (14) PFB – Plant Family Beds; (15) Pi – Pinetum; (16) RD – Rhododendron Dell; (17) RG – Rock Garden; (18) RK – Royals Kitchen; (19) ReG – Redwood Grove; (20) RoG – Rose Garden; (21) SVP – Student Vegetables Plot; (22) TRON – Tropical Nursery.

Alien aphid species

20 species were regarded as alien to the European aphid fauna and among them nine are believed to be the first published records for Kew: Aphis (Aphis) gossypii Glover, 1877, A. (A.) spiraecola Patch, 1914, A. (Toxoptera) aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841, Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) fragaefolii (Cockerell, 1901), Ericolophium holsti (Takahashi, 1935), Illinoia (Illinoia) liriodendri (Monell, 1879), Illinoia (Masonaphis) lambersi (MacGillivray, 1960), Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) albifrons Essig, 1911, Neotoxoptera formosana (Takahashi, 1921).

Pest species

20 species were regarded as serious pests, capable of virus transmission: Aphis (Aphis) fabae Scopoli, 1763, A. (A.) gossypii, A. (A.) pomi De Geer, 1773, A. (A.) spiraecola, A. (Bursaphis) grossulariae Kaltenbach, 1843, A. (Toxoptera) aurantii, Hyalopterus pruni (Geoffroy, 1762), Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (Linnaeus, 1761), Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) pisum Harris, 1776, Brachycaudus (Prunaphis) cardui (Linnaeus, 1758), Cavariella aegopodii (Scopoli, 1763), Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) fragaefolii, Cryptomyzus (Cryptomyzus) ribis (Linnaeus, 1758), Dysaphis (Dysaphis) tulipae (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841), Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae (Thomas, 1878), M. (M.) rosae (Linnaeus, 1758), Megoura viciae Buckton, 1876, Myzus (Myzus) cerasi (Fabricius, 1775), M. (M.) ornatus Laing, 1932, M. (Nectarosiphon) persicae (Sulzer, 1776). Although the garden staff use mostly natural methods to control such serious pests (i.e. the biocontrols of different mixes of parasitoid wasps like Aphidius colemani Viereck, 1912, A. ervi Haliday, 1834, A. matricariae Haliday, 1834 Aphelinus abdominalis (Dalman, 1820), Praon volucre (Haliday, 1833), Ephedrus cerasicola Starý, 1962 and the predatory fly Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani, 1847) or lace wing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens, 1836) (P. Rees pers. comm.), without spreading aggressive insecticides, most infected host plants did not have visible damage. The exception were some plants in the Student Vegetables Plot e.g. Prunus sp., Solanum lycopersicon, Solanum tuberosum and in the Arboretum Nursery e.g. Acer palmatum ‘BiHoo’, Ribes orientalis, where feeding aphids promoted curled and distorted leaves as well as chlorosis or honeydew deposits. In the collection of living plants grown out in the Gardens feeding Phylloxera glabra (von Heyden, 1837) had caused necrotic spots on the leaves of Quercus dentata in the Quercus collection.

Host-plants associations

The list of host plants includes 155 taxa from 89 genera and 49 families and is summarised in Table 1. The most frequently infested plant species belong to Fagaceae (20 species, 25 samples), Betulaceae and Sapindaceae (13 species and 15 samples each). The most frequently infested genera were Quercus (10 species, 21 samples) and Acer (6 species, 15 samples). The highest diversity of aphid species was observed on Quercus and consisted of 10 species. Aphis (A.) fabae and Macrosiphum (M.) euphorbiae were the most frequent aphid species found with the widest host range. Whereas A. (A.) fabae was found on colonized about 30 host plants, M. (M.) euphorbiae was only associated with ten hosts. The remaining species were associated with one to four host plants (Table 1).
Table 1

Host plant index and associated Aphidomorpha species collected in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

No.Host plant taxonAphidomorpha taxon
1Abies pinsapo Boiss. Mindarus abietinus
2Acer campestre L.Periphyllus hirticornis, Periphyllus lyropictus
3Acer griseum (Franch.) Pax Periphyllus acericola
4Acer negundo L. Periphyllus testudinaceus
5Acer oblongum Wall. ex DC. Drepanosiphum platanoidis
6Acer oliverianum Pax Periphyllus testudinaceus
7Acer palmatum Thunb. Periphyllus californiensis
8Acer palmatum Thunb. ‘Bi Hoo’Periphyllus californiensis, Periphyllus testudinaceus
9Acer palmatum Thunb. ‘Senkaki’Periphyllus testudinaceus,
10Acer pseudoplatanus L. Drepanosiphum platanoidis
11Acer heldreichii subsp. trautvetteri (Medw.) A.E. MurrayDrepanosiphum platanoidis, Periphyllus acericola
12Achillea millefolium L. ‘Pink Grapefruit’Brachycaudus (Prunaphis) cardui, Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) absinthii
13Achillea sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae, Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) millefolii
14Acorus calamus L.’Variegatus’ Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
15Aesculus × hybrida DC. Periphyllus testudinaceus
16Aesculus turbinata BlumeAphis (Aphis) fabae
17Ageratina ligustrina (DC.) R.M. King & H. Rob.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
18Allium nutans L. Neotoxoptera formosana
19Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.Pterocallis (Pterocallis) maculata
20Alnus rubra Bong.Pterocallis (Pterocallis) alni
21Aquilegia vulgaris L. Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
22Arctium lappa L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
23Artemisia absinthium L.Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) absinthii
24Bambusa sp. Takecallis arundinariae
25Betula utilis subsp. albosinensis (Burkill) Ashburner & McAll. Symydobius oblongus
26Betula dauurica Pall. Calaphis flava
27Betula ermanii Cham. Calaphis flava
28Betula grossa Siebold & Zucc. Callipterinella calliptera
29Betula pubescens var. litwinowii (Doluch.) Ashburner & McAll. Symydobius oblongus
30Betula pendula Roth Euceraphis betulae
31Betula pendula subsp. mandshurica (Regel) Ashburner & McAll. Clethrobius comes
32Betula pendula subsp. szechuanica (C.K. Schneid.) Ashburner & McAll. Euceraphis betulae
33Betula utilis D. Don Symydobius oblongus
34Betula utilis D. Don var. prattii BurkillBetulaphis quadrituberculata, Calaphis flava, Monaphis antennata
35Bremeria landia var. holosericea (Sm.) A.P. Davis & Razafim.Aphis (Aphis) spiraecola
36Camellia japonica L.Aphis (Toxoptera) aurantii
37Carpinus cordata Blume var. chinensis Franch.Myzocallis (Myzocallis) carpini
38Castanea sativa Mill.Myzocallis (Agrioaphis) castanicola,
39Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti ex CarrièreCinara (Cinara) cedri
40Cedrus libani A. Rich.Cinara (Cinara) cedri
41Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
42Cistus laurifolius L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
43Clianthus puniceus (G. Don) Sol. ex Lindl.Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) malvae
44Cornus mas L.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
45Cornus sp. Anoecia corni
46Corylus avellana L.Myzocallis (Myzocallis) coryli, Corylobium avellanae
47Crataegus pentagyna Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd.Aphis (Aphis) pomi
48Crossandra pungens LindauMyzus (Nectarosiphon) persicae
49Cynara cardunculus L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
50Digitalis purpurea L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
51Echium amoenum Fisch. & C.A. Mey.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
52Erythranthe naiandina (J.M. Watson & C. Bohlen) G.L. NesomAphis (Aphis) fabae
53Eschscholzia californica Cham.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
54Euphorbia characias L. Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiellum
55Fagus sylvatica L. Phyllaphis fagi
56Fagus sylvatica ‘Tricolor’ Phyllaphis fagi
57Fatsia japonica (Thunb) Decne. & Planch.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
58Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Cavariella aegopodii
59Fragaria × ananassa (Duchesne ex Weston) Duchesne ex RozierChaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) fragaefolii
60Hedera sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
61Hedlundia minima (Ley) Sennikov & KurttoAphis (Aphis) pomi
62Ilex sp.Aphis (Aphis) ilicis
63Iris pallida Lam. Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
64Iris sp.Aphis (Aphis) newtoni, Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae, Dysaphis (Dysaphis) tulipae, Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
65Juglans regia L.Chromaphis juglandicola, Panaphis juglandis
66Koelreuteria bipinnata Franch.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
67Lathyrus montanus Bernh. Megoura viciae
68Lathyrus sp.Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) pisum
69Leptodermis pilosa DielsAphis (Aphis) gossypii
70Leucanthemum × superbum (Bergmans ex J.W.Ingram) D.H. KentAphis (Aphis) fabae, Brachycaudus (Prunaphis) cardui
71Liriodendron tulipifera L.Illinoia (Illinoia) liriodendri
72Lonicera implexa Aiton. Hyadaphis passerinii
73Lupinus ehrenbergii Schltdl. var. ehrenbergiiMacrosiphum (Macrosiphum) albifrons
74Lupinus ‘My Castle’Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) albifrons
75Lupinus ‘The Governor’Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) albifrons
76Lychnis coronaria (L.) Desr.Brachycaudus (Acaudus) lychnidis
77Malus domestica (Sukow) Borkh.Dysaphis (Pomaphis) plantaginea
78Malus tschonoskii (Maxim.) C.K. Schneid.Aphis (Aphis) pomi
79Matricaria chamomilla L.Brachycaudus (Prunaphis) cardui
80Monarda fistulosa L. var menthifolia (Graham) FernaldAphis (Aphis) fabae
81Musa sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
82Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
83Oenothera magellanica Phil.Aphis (Bursaphis) grossulariae
84Oxylobium lineare Benth.Aphis (Aphis) gossypii
85Paulownia fargesii Franch.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
86Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Hyalopterus pruni
87Phyllostachys aurea (André) Rivière & C. Rivière Takecallis arundinariae
88Picea sp.Adelges laricis, Cinara (Cinara) piceae
89Pieris japonica (Thunb.) D. Don ex G. DonAphis (Aphis) fabae
90Pinus nigra J.F. ArnoldCinara (Cinara) pini, Cinara (Schizolachnus) pineti
91Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham.Cinara (Cinara) pini
92Pinus sylvestris L.Cinara (Cinara) pinea
93Pinus sylvestris L. ‘Beuvronensis’Cinara (Cinara) pilosa
94Polyspora sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
95Populus balsamifera L.Pemphigus spyrothecae, Pterocomma populeum
96Populus × canadensis MoenchChaitophorus leucomelas, Pterocomma populeum
97Populus × canescens (Ait.) Sm. Chaitophorus populeti
98Populus incrassata Dode Pterocomma populeum
99Populus grandidentata Michx.Chaitophorus leucomelas, Pterocomma populeum
100Populus nigra L.Chaitophorus leucomelas, Pterocomma populeum
101Populus nigra L. subsp. betulifolia (Pursh) W. Wettst. ex Buttler & HandThecabius affinis, Chaitophorus leucomelas, Pterocomma populeum
102Primula sec. ProliferaeMyzus (Myzus) ornatus
103Primula sp.Myzus (Myzus) ornatus
104Prunus serrulata Lindl. ‘Amanogawa’Myzus (Myzus) cerasi
105Prunus × yedoensis Matsum.Myzus (Nectarosiphon) persicae
106Pseudosasa japonica (Siebold & Zucc. ex Steud.) Makino ex Nakai Takecallis arundicolens
107Pyrus sp. Melanaphis pyraria
108Rosa ‘Jacques Cartier’Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) rosae
109Rosa ‘Tuscany’Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) rosae
110Rosa sp.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) rosae, Maculolachnus submacula
111Quercus cornelius-mulleri Nixon & K. P. Steele Lachnus pallipes
112Quercus chenii Nakai Thelaxes dryophila
113Quercus dentata Thunb. Phylloxera glabra
114Quercus faginea Lam. Lachnus roboris
115Quercus falcata Michx. Lachnus roboris
116Quercus germana Schltdl. & Cham. Thelaxes dryophila
117Quercus × hispanica Lam. ‘Lucombeana'Tuberculatus (Tuberculoides) annulatus
118Quercus ilex L. Thelaxes suberi
119Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb.Myzocallis (Agrioaphis) castanicola
120Quercus nigra L. Lachnus roboris
121Quercus palustris Munchh. Lachnus pallipes
122Quercus pontica K. Koch Lachnus roboris
123Quercus robur L.Myzocallis (Agrioaphis) castanicola, Myzocallis (Myzocallis) boerneri, Tuberculatus (Tuberculatus) querceus, Tuberculatus (Tuberculoides) annulatus
124Quercus rugosa Née Thelaxes suberi
125Quercus × sargentii ‘Thomas’ Rehder Lachnus roboris
126Quercus sp. Lachnus roboris
127Rheum palmatum L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
128Rheum rhabarbarum L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
129Rhododendron ‘Golden Sunset’Illinoia (Masonaphis) lambersi
130Rhododendron sp.Aphis (Aphis) spiraecola, Ericolophium holsti
131Ribes nigrum L.Cryptomyzus (Cryptomyzus) ribis
132Ribes orientale Desf.Cryptomyzus (Cryptomyzus) korschelti
133Ribes sp.Aphis (Bursaphis) grossulariae
134Rudbeckia sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
135Salix aegyptiaca L.Aphis (Aphis) farinosa
136Salix × fragilis L. Chaitophorus salijaponicus niger
137Salix lasiolepis Benth.Chaitophorus horii beuthani, Pterocomma pilosum
138Salix myrsinifolia Salisb. Chaitophorus vitellinae
139Salix prolixa AnderssonAphis (Aphis) farinosa
140Sasa palmata (Burb.) E.G. CamusTakecallis arundinariae, Takecallis taiwanus
141Saurauia napaulensis DC. Myzus (Myzus) ornatus
142Sedum telephium L.Aphis (Aphis) sedi, Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) hellebori
143Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.Illinoia (Illinoia) morrisoni
144Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
144Skimia sp.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
146Solanum lycopersicum L.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
147Solanum tuberosum L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
148Tilia tomentosa Moench Eucallipterus tiliae
149Verbascum densiflorum Bertol.Aphis (Aphis) verbasci
150Viburnum farreri StearnAphis (Aphis) fabae
151Viburnum sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
152Vicia faba L.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
153Wahlenbergia angustifolia (Roxb.) A. DC.Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
154Yucca glauca Nutt.Aphis (Aphis) fabae
155Yucca sp.Aphis (Aphis) fabae, Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae
Host plant index and associated Aphidomorpha species collected in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. The list of all collected species is presented in Table 2 and the Supplementary Material. In the Supplementary Material Aphidomorpha species were listed in systematic category alphabetically and sampling data for each aphid species include: locality, host plant, date and the unique sample number.
Table 2

Aphidomorpha collected during Eastop’s (1962, 1965) and the present (2017) study in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

No.TaxonEastop2017
19621965
ADELGIDAE: ADELGINAE
1Adelges laricis Vallot, 1836+
PHYLLOXERIDAE: PHYLLOXERINAE
2Phylloxera glabra (von Heyden, 1837)+
APHIDIDAE: ERIOSOMATINAE
3Eriosoma patchiae patchiae (Bӧrner & Blunck, 1916)++
4Eriosoma patchiae lanuginosum (Hartig, 1839)+
5Pemphigus bursarius (Linnaeus, 1758)*+
6Pemphigus spyrothecae Passerini, 1856++
7Thecabius affinis (Kaltenbach, 1843)*++
APHIDIDAE: ANOECIINAE
8Anoecia corni (Fabricius, 1775)*++
APHIDIDAE:THELAXINAE
9Glyphina betulae (Linnaeus, 1758)+
10Thelaxes dryophila (Schrank, 1801)*+++
11Thelaxes suberi (Del Guercio, 1911)++
APHIDIDAE: MINDARINAE
12Mindarus abietinus Koch, 1857++
APHIDIDAE: DREPANOSIPHINAE
13Drepanosiphum platanoidis (Schrank, 1801)* + +
APHIDIDAE:PHYLLAPHIDINAE
14Phyllaphis fagi Linnaeus, 1767*++
APHIDIDAE:CALAPHIDINAE: Calaphidini
15Betulaphis quadrituberculata (Kaltenbach, 1843)++
16Calaphis flava Mordvilko, 1928*+++
17Callipterinella calliptera (Hartig, 1841)+
18Callipterinella minutissima (Stroyan, 1953)+
19Clethrobius comes (Walker, 1848)+
20Euceraphis betulae (Koch, 1855)+
21Euceraphis punctipennis (Zetterstedt, 1828)*++
22Monaphis antennata (Kaltenbach, 1843)++
23Symydobius oblongus (Von Heyden, 1837)+
APHIDIDAE:CALAPHIDINAE: Panaphidini
24! Chromaphis juglandicola (Kaltenbach, 1843)*++
25Eucallipterus tiliae (Linnaeus, 1758)*++
26Myzocallis (Agrioaphis) castanicola Baker, 1917*++
27Myzocallis (Myzocallis) boerneri Stroyan, 1957++
28Myzocallis (Myzocallis) carpini (Koch, 1855)++
29Myzocallis (Myzocallis) coryli (Goeze, 1778)*++
30Myzocallis (Myzocallis) schreiberi Hille Ris Lambers & Stroyan, 1959+
31! Panaphis juglandis (Goeze, 1778)*++
32Pterocallis (Pterocallis) alni (De Geer, 1773)+
33Pterocallis (Pterocallis) maculata (von Heyden, 1837)+
34! Takecallis arundicolens (Clarke, 1903)++
35! Takecallis arundinariae (Essig, 1917)++
36! Takecallis taiwanus (Takahashi, 1926)++
37Tuberculatus (Tuberculatus) querceus (Kaltenbach, 1843)*++
38Tuberculatus (Tuberculoides) annulatus (Hartig, 1841)++
APHIDIDAE:SALTUSAPHIDINAE
39Subsaltusaphis sp.+
APHIDIDAE:CHAITOPHORINAE: Chaitophorini
40Chaitophorus capreae (Mosley, 1841)*++
41Chaitophorus horii beuthani (Bӧrner, 1950)+
42Chaitophorus leucomelas Koch, 1854*++
43Chaitophorus populeti (Panzer, 1804)+
44Chaitophorus salijaponicus niger Mordvilko, 1929++
45Chaitophorus vitellinae (Schrank, 1801)+
46Periphyllus acericola (Walker, 1848)+
47! Periphyllus californiensis (Shinji, 1917)++
48Periphyllus hirticornis (Walker, 1848)++
49Periphyllus lyropictus (Kessler, 1886)+
50Periphyllus testudinaceus (Fernie, 1852)*+++
APHIDIDAE:CHAITOPHORINAE: Siphini
51Caricosipha paniculatae Bӧrner, 1939+
APHIDIDAE:APHIDINAE: Aphidini
52Aphis (Aphis) comosa (Bӧrner, 1950)+
53Aphis (Aphis) craccae Linnaeus, 1758+
54Aphis (Aphis) cytisorum sarothamni Franssen, 1928+
55Aphis (Aphis) fabae Scopoli, 1763*+++
56Aphis (Aphis) fabae solanella Theobald, 1914+
57Aphis (Aphis) farinosa Gmelin, 1790+
58Aphis (Aphis) genistae Scopoli, 1763+
59! Aphis (Aphis) gossypii Glover, 1877+
60Aphis (Aphis) ilicis Kaltenbach, 1843++
61Aphis (Aphis) nasturtii Kaltenbach, 1843+
62Aphis (Aphis) newtoni Theobald, 1927+
63Aphis (Aphis) pomi De Geer, 1773+
64Aphis (Aphis) praeterita Walker, 1849+
65Aphis (Aphis) salicariae Koch, 1855+
66Aphis (Aphis) sedi Kaltenbach, 1843+
67! Aphis (Aphis) spiraecola Patch, 1914+
68Aphis (Aphis) verbasci Schrank, 1801+
69Aphis (Bursaphis) epilobiaria Theobald, 1927+
70Aphis (Bursaphis) epilobii Kaltenbach, 1843*+
71Aphis (Bursaphis) grossulariae Kaltenbach, 1843+
72! Aphis (Toxoptera) aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841+
73Hyalopterus pruni (Geoffroy, 1762)++
74Melanaphis luzulella (Hille Ris Lambers, 1947)+
75Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (Linnaeus, 1761)++
76Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae (Schrank, 1801)*++
77Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus, 1758)++
78Schizaphis (Paraschizaphis) scirpi (Passerini, 1874)+
APHIDIDAE:APHIDINAE: Macrosiphini
79Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) loti (Theobald, 1913)+
80Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) malvae (Mosley, 1841)*+++
81Acyrthosiphon (Acyrthosiphon) pisum Harris, 1776*+++
82Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach, 1843)*++
83Brachycaudus (Acaudus) lychnidis (Linnaeus, 1758)*++
84Brachycaudus (Brachycaudus) helichrysi (Kaltenbach, 1843)*+
85Brachycaudus (Prunaphis) cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)+
86Brachycolus cucubali (Passerini, 1863)+
87Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758)*+
88Capitophorus hippophaes (Walker, 1852)++
89Capitophorus inulae (Passerini, 1860)+
90Capitophorus pakansus Hottes & Frison, 1931+
91Cavariella aegopodii (Scopoli, 1763)*+++
92Cavariella archangelicae (Scopoli, 1763)+
93Cavariella pastinacae (Linnaeus, 1758)+
94Cavariella theobaldi (Gillete & Bragg, 1918)++
95Ceruraphis eriophori (Walker, 1848)+
96! Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) fragaefolii (Cockerell, 1901)+
97Coloradoa achilleae Hille Ris Lambers, 1939+
98Coloradoa tanacetina (Walker, 1850)+
99Corylobium avellanae (Schrank, 1801)*++
100Cryptaphis poae (Hardy, 1850)+
101Cryptomyzus (Cryptomyzus) korschelti Bӧrner, 1938+
102Cryptomyzus (Cryptomyzus) ribis (Linnaeus, 1758)+
103Delphiniobium junackianum (Karsch, 1887)++
104Diuraphis (Holcaphis) holci (Hille Ris Lambers, 1956)+
105Dysaphis (Dysaphis) apifolia (Theobald, 1923)+
106Dysaphis (Dysaphis) tulipae (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841)+
107Dysaphis (Pomaphis) pyri (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841)*++
108Dysaphis (Pomaphis) plantaginea (Passerini, 1860)+
109Elatobium abietinum (Walker, 1849)*+
110! Ericolophium holsti (Takahashi, 1935)+
111Hyadaphis passerinii (Del Guercio, 1911)+
112Hyalopteroides humilis (Walker, 1852)+
113Hyperomyzus (Hyperomyzus) lactucae (Linnaeus, 1758)+
114Hyperomyzus (Hyperomyzus) lampsanae (Bӧrner, 1932)+
115Hyperomyzus (Neonasonovia) picridis (Bӧrner & Blunck, 1916)+
116! Illinoia (Illinoia) andromedae (MacGillivray, 1953)+
117! Illinoia (Illinoia) goldmayrae (Knowlton, 1938)++
118! Illinoia (Illinoia) liriodendri (Monell, 1879)+
119! Illinoia (Illinoia) morrisoni (Swain, 1918)++
120! Illinoia (Masonaphis) lambersi (MacGillivray, 1960)+
121Linosiphon galiophagum (Wimshurst, 1923)+
122Liosomaphis berberidis (Kaltenbach, 1843)*+
123Lipaphis (Lipaphis) erysimi (Kaltenbach, 1843)+
124Longicaudus trirhodus (Walker, 1849)+
125Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) abrotani (Walker, 1852)+
126Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) absinthii (Linnaeus, 1758)+++
127Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) artemisiae (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841)+
128Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) millefolii (De Geer, 1773)*++
129! Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) sanborni (Gillette, 1908)+
130Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) sejuncta (Walker, 1848)+
131Macrosiphoniella (Macrosiphoniella) tapuskae (Hottes & Frison, 1931)+
132Macrosiphoniella (Phalangomyzus) oblonga (Mordvilko, 1901)++
133! Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) albifrons Essig, 1911+
134Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) cholodkovskyi (Mordvilko, 1909)+
135Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) daphnidis Bӧrner, 1950+
136! Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiae (Thomas, 1878)*+++
137Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) euphorbiellum Theobald, 1917+
138Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) funestum (Macchiati, 1885)+
139Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) hellebori Theobald &Walton, 1923++
140Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) rosae (Linnaeus, 1758)*++
141Macrosiphum (Macrosiphum) stellariae Theobald, 1913+
142Megoura viciae Buckton, 1876++
143Melanaphis pyraria (Passerini, 1861)+
144Metopeurum fuscoviride Stroyan, 1950+
145Metopolophium (Metopolophium) dirhodum (Walker, 1849)*+
146Myzaphis rosarum (Kaltenbach, 1843)+
147Myzus (Myzus) cerasi (Fabricius, 1775)+
148Myzus (Myzus) lythri (Schrank, 1801)+
149! Myzus (Myzus) ornatus Laing, 1932+++
150! Myzus (Nectarosiphon) persicae (Sulzer, 1776)*++
151! Myzus (Sciamyzus) ascalonicus Doncaster, 1946++
152! Myzus (Sciamyzus) cymbalariae Stroyan, 1954+
153Nasonovia (Nasonovia) ribisnigri (Mosley, 1841)*+
154! Neomyzus circumflexus (Buckton, 1876)*+
155! Neotoxoptera formosana (Takahashi, 1921)+
156Ovatomyzus stachyos Hille Ris Lambers, 1947+
157Ovatus (Ovatus) crataegarius (Walker, 1850)+
158Ovatus (Ovatus) insitus (Walker, 1849)+
159Pterocomma pilosum Buckton, 1879++
160Pterocomma populeum (Kaltenbach, 1843)+++
161Pterocomma rufipes (Hartig, 1841)+
162Sitobion (Sitobion) avenae (Fabricius, 1775)*++
163Sitobion (Sitobion) fragariae (Walker, 1848)*+
164! Sitobion (Sitobion) luteum (Buckton, 1876)+
165Tubaphis ranunculina (Walker, 1852)+
166Uroleucon (Uroleucon) achilleae (Koch, 1855)*+
167Uroleucon (Uroleucon) cichorii (Koch, 1855)+
168Vesiculaphis theobaldi Takahashi, 1930+
169! Wahlgreniella arbuti (Davidson, 1910)+
LACHNINAE: Eulachnini
170! Cinara (Cinara) cedri Mimeur, 1936+
171Cinara (Cinara) cuneomaculata (Del Guercio, 1909)+
172Cinara (Cinara) pectinatae (Nӧrdlinger, 1880)+
173Cinara (Cinara) piceae (Panzer, 1800)+
174Cinara (Cinara) pilicornis (Hartig, 1841)*++
175Cinara (Cinara) pilosa (Zetterstedt, 1940)+
176Cinara (Cinara) pinea (Mordvilko, 1895)*++
177Cinara (Cinara) pini (Linnaeus, 1758)+
178Cinara (Cupressobium) juniperi (De Geer, 1773)*+
179Cinara (Schizolachnus) pineti (Fabricius, 1781)++
180Eulachnus agilis (Kaltenbach, 1843)*+
181Eulachnus brevipilosus Bӧrner, 1940+
182Eulachnus rileyi (Williams, 1911)+
LACHNINAE: Lachnini
183Lachnus pallipes (Hartig, 1841)+
184Lachnus roboris (Linnaeus, 1758)+
185Maculolachnus submacula (Walker, 1848)+
LACHNINAE: Tuberolachnini
186Tuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin, 1790)+

An exclamation mark [!] beside the name denotes alien species; a star mark * indicates species listed by Laing (1920).

Aphidomorpha collected during Eastop’s (1962, 1965) and the present (2017) study in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. An exclamation mark [!] beside the name denotes alien species; a star mark * indicates species listed by Laing (1920).

Discussion

According to Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew includes globally significant ex situ plant collections, covering approximately a third of known plant diversity, world-class seed banks, glasshouses and tissue culture infrastructures. It remains an open question, whether the Aphidomorpha present in Kew should be treated as an element of its biodiversity or an element threatening this diversity. Aphids are strictly associated with their host plants. The presence of the host plant determines the presence of aphids, so it can be expected that with the constant species composition of plants in Kew, species composition of aphids will also be constant over time. Comparing both Eastops aphid lists[28,29], it can be seen that in the following years the species composition of the aphids varied significantly, in terms of quantity. In 1962, 91 species were found, while in 1965 77 taxa. In both lists we find only 25 common species. In 1962, greater variation was also demonstrated in the level of subfamilies and genera and the number of alien and pest species. Macrosiphini was dominant in both lists (Table 3). Comparing the whole aphid fauna collected by Eastop[28,29], and during the present study, it is worth underlining, that in four years of collection, Eastop identified 142 taxa. In comparison, collecting aphids within twelve days allowed for identification of 95 species. The first conclusion is that the Kew aphid fauna is still rich and in a relatively short time a large number of aphid samples can be collected. However, comparing Eastop’s lists of species and results of the current study only 50 taxa are found in common (28 species in 1962 and 27 species in 1965). In the 1960’s Eastop collected 90 taxa that were not recorded during the present study. At the same time, current research has provided information on 45 species not listed by Eastop (Tables 2 and 3). Most of these species are in general widespread and common, some of them were collected by Eastop in Kew district but outside the Garden[28,29] and are not included in the Table 2. The differences in the number of collected taxa results rather from the time spent collecting aphids (four years versus twelve days), than other conditions. The research was conducted in June, convenient due to the biology of aphids (both monoecious or heteroecious species) for collecting these insects. An exception may be species that in the early summer do not appear, like Tuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin, 1790), or which finish their life cycle earlier, such as aphids of the genus Glyphina[33], both of them listed by Eastop[28,29]. The exception may also apply to species for various reasons considered rare in the Britain aphidofauna[33,34], such as Callipterinella calliptera (Hartig, 1841), Clethrobius comes (Walker, 1848), Monaphis antennata (Kaltenbach, 1843), Pterocallis (Pterocallis) maculata (von Heyden, 1837) or Lachnus pallipes (Hartig, 1841), found during this study. As Macrosiphini are dominant among species that were not common on both lists, the number of economically important species of aphids, capable of virus transmission, is twice as high in Eastop’s study, as in the current survey. However, the number of species of foreign origin found during present study is twice as high compared to Eastop’s lists. This is obvious, because at least five of these species have been found in Europe in recent decades (e.g. Illinoia (M.) lambersi in 1971, Macrosiphum (M.) albifrons in 1981 or Illinoia (I.) liriodendri in 1998)[12]. It is also worth emphasizing, that among 155 listed host plants, 23 are regarded as threatened according to the IUCN. Most of them have a very limited distribution and a restricted habitat in their native range. For example, Wahlenbergia angustifolia is endemic to the island of St Helena, listed as Vulnerable[35], whereas Abies pinsapo, distributed in small areas of Spain and Morocco, is listed as Endangered[36]. Our research proves, that far away from their natural range, in favourable conditions, they can be also colonized by aphids. In the case of endemic or native plant species, in their natural range, this threat can be important[37]. In addition to sampling aphids from threatened species of host plants, they were also collected from one of Kew Gardens’ Heritage trees, Quercus × hispanica ‘Lucombeana’, which is believed to have been planted at Kew in 1773.
Table 3

The most important quantitative data resulting from the Eastops’ lists (1962, 1965) and current research (2017).

Eastop 1962Eastop 19652017 (present study)
Total number of taxa917794
Total number of taxa142
Total number of taxa186
Common number of taxa50
Taxonomic comparison
Adelginae001
Phylloxerinae001
Eriosomatinae332
Anoeciinae101
Thelaxinae132
Mindarinae101
Drepanosiphinae101
Phyllaphidinae101
Calaphidinae71321
Saltusaphidinae010
Chaitophorinae5410
Aphidinae/Aphidini13813
Aphidinae/Macrosiphini514131
Lachninae749
Alien species
121020
Common number of taxa4
Pest species
251720
Common number of taxa9
The most important quantitative data resulting from the Eastops’ lists (1962, 1965) and current research (2017). In total, 191 species of aphids have been listed from Kew[28-32,38], including the present study, which is almost 1/3 of species presented in the check-list of aphids in Britain[39]. Kew includes globally significant ex situ collections, covering approximately a third of known plant diversity. Therefore, it is not surprising, that due to the diversity of host plants from different parts of the world, the variety of aphids associated with them is so large and it will probably grow. Aphid species are not evenly distributed within Europe. The number of alien species present in a country is significantly and positively correlated with the number of native species recorded in that country, and, to a lesser extent, with the number of local taxonomists. Great Britain, with 65 alien aphid species, is on the top of European countries with identified numbers of those species. Among them, 36 were a first European record and at least five of them were first detected in Kew. Most of those species (18) came from North America, ten from Temperate Asia, two from Africa or tropical/subtropical areas of the world, respectively, two from Asia (generally) and two are cryptogenic[12]. The first record of alien species in the British aphidofauna (and Europe as a whole) concerned Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann, 1802) recorded in 1787[40]. The newest record is the presence of Ericolophium holsti, trapped in 2011[13]. The detection of species over the years has also been interesting. In 18th and 19th centuries there were three species, in 20th century 30 species (with the greatest number between 1950–1980 when 14 alien species were recorded, ten from North America) and in 21st century three species have been found[12,13]. The aphid fauna of Kew includes a significant number of non-native aphid species. In 1962 and 1965 Eastop listed 18 alien species (on subsequent lists twelve and ten species, respectively). Among them Illinoia (I.) andromedae (MacGillivray, 1953) and Illinoia (I.) goldamaryae (Knowlton, 1938) (both from North America), were known as a first record for Europe. Unfortunately, during our study, the presence of those species in Kew was not confirmed. The third known species, recorded by Eastop[28] as new for Europe - Illinoia (I.) morrisoni (Swain, 1918), associated with Sequoia sempervirens, was collected during the present study from the young shoots of its host plant in the Redwood Grove, in the same location as 60 years ago. In Britain, since Eastop’s original find, this species has been found three times – in Scotland (2001, suction-trap), South Wales (2007 from the host-plant) and Kent (2014, from the host-plant)[33]. However, now is treated as common and widely distributed in Britain[33]. In Europe, this species was recorded from France[41], Italy[42] and Portugal[43]. Our inventory study brings data on ten additional non-native species of aphids detected in Kew (Table 2), at least half of these are known to be expanding their range. The clear movement of the alien aphid species is visible in the example of Neotoxoptera formosana (the onion aphid). The onion aphid, a pest of wild and cultivated (especially commercial) Allium has been recorded on the following hosts: Allium ascalonicum, A. cepa, A. chinense, A. fistulosum, A. porrum, A. sativum, A. schoenoprasum, A. tuberosum, and others[44]. In Europe this Asian species, is known from France (first record in 1984[45]), Finland (first record in 1994 on onions imported from the Netherlands), Italy (first record in 2000 on chives, A. schoenoprasum grown under glasshouse conditions[46], Germany (first record in 2006 on stored onions in Konstanz (Bruehl, pers. comm.) and in 2007 in two fields of chives[47]) and the Netherlands (first record in 1994 and in 2008 on chives from a garden centre[48]). In the UK, this pest was found in September 1999, on a stock of Welsh onions (A. fistulosum) growing in a plastic tub in the Model Vegetable Garden at RHS Wisley, Surrey. The following year, in May, the species was again detected at RHS Wisley. N. formosana does not usually occur in the UK, although winged form was trapped in 40 ft aerial suction traps at Kirton, Lincolnshire in May 2002 and from Silwood Park in October 2005[44]. Later, the species was detected in Fife, Scotland in 2008 and on an onion purchased at a supermarket in Inverness, Scotland in August 2013[33]. It has a narrow host range. However, now is widespread and well established in Britain[49] and it represents a potential risk to the UK Allium industry, which since 1995/96 has averaged approximately 13,000 ha with a value of just under £100 million. It can transmit viruses that cause plant damage and stunting although it is not a very efficient vector[44,47]. During the present study, the species was collected from the shoot of Allium nutans in the Rock Gardens of Kew. It proved that N. formosana can establish in Britain not only on Allium crops but also on common, wild Allium spp. and could survive in a cool maritime climate such as the UK. To a lesser extent, we can now witness the expanding range of another non-native species. Ericolophium holsti is an alien species, first recorded in 2011 as new to Europe, which has only been recorded in the UK in the Rothamsted Insect Survey’s suction-traps. A single winged specimen was trapped in 2011 at Ascot, Berkshire, subsequently in 2012 three were caught at Rothamsted, Harpenden 60 km away[13]. In 2014 four specimens were caught, one each at Warwick, Harpenden, Hertfordshire; Boston, Lincolnshire; and Starcross, (near Exeter), Devon. This species of Asiatic origin, associated with Rhododendron spp., was not found in the field in Britain[50]. During this study, for the first time, the species was collected from the shoots of cultivated Rhododendron spp. in the Rhododendron Dell of Kew. The species was observed on three individuals of the host-plant – mostly winged morphs, however on one plant a colony of winged, wingless and nymphs was observed. This is the first record of E. holsti found in the field in the UK on its host. It is worth noting, that the new location in Kew (field study) is the closest to its original place of collection in Ascot, a distance of about 35 km (suction-trap). As a novel alien species detected in Europe, it is difficult to predict the impact of E. holsti on its host-plants. There was a similar situation for Cinara curvipes (Patch, 1912), which was first recorded in 1999 in Kew[32] and soon spread to other parts of the UK[51]. Its spread into continental Europe was also very quick, as the species was detected in 2001 in Germany and Serbia; in 2007 in Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia; in 2013 in Hungary; in 2014 in Austria; and in 2015 in Poland. C. curvipes is able to infest native European coniferous trees and in some countries, has pest status[52,53]. Thus, in Kew 30 species non-native for Europe have been listed so far[28,29,31,32], including the present study, which is half of all known non-native species detected in the UK. The combination of factors like a large and diverse collections of plants, the majority of which are exotic in Kew, the short distance to airports (Heathrow airport <11 km), seaports (the Port of London ~16 km) and human population density (London), promotes both the settlement and the spread of species of foreign origin, but firstly the introduction[54]. In particular, potential hotspots of invasions such as airports, should be monitored as a priority to prevent new invasions from these species[55,56] (e.g. at Heathrow, one of the world’s busiest airports close to Kew, various plants, including threatened ones, have been confiscated[57]). As Aphidomorpha are small insects, easily transported by air or with plant material, the number of introductions of aliens will probably increase, this is also linked to the continued expansion of the worldwide air transportation network[58]. Moreover, aphids are able to adapt to climate change faster than many other insect groups studied because of their low developmental threshold temperature and high intrinsic rate of increase[39]. Botanic gardens are not substitutes for study in natural areas but should be viewed as complementary. The plants are well identified thus making the identification of insects, even from exotic plants, easier. In particular, in the case of Aphidomorpha, which are mostly strictly associated with their host plants. The key factor is the prevention of an introduction of a non-native species. If prevention fails, then early detection and rapid response to remove the species becomes very important. It is easier to fight invasiveness if the discovery of the non-native species is made early[59]. With simple tools (short-term faunistic inventory of important insects) we achieved effective results. According to this, botanic gardens shouldn’t be the gateway for alien species, but instead the gateway to information on alien and invasive ones. Therefore, the database of such species (even in form of simple list) will help identify the scale and spatial pattern of invasive alien and pest species and can be used as a framework for considering indicators for early warning as well as a model for other studies.

Material and Methods

Collecting area

The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Kew) are situated in the London Borough (district) of Richmond upon Thames, in southwest Greater London, United Kingdom, 51° 28′ 0.12″ N 0° 16′ 59.88″ W. Surveys reported here were carried out mostly in the collection of living plants grown unprotected outside in the Gardens, as well as a limited number in controlled conditions within glasshouses and nurseries on site. The abbreviations denote as follow: AColl. – Acer spp. collection; ARBN – Arboretum Nursery; BColl. – Betula spp. collection; PColl. – Populus spp. collection; QColl. – Quercus spp. collection; AG – Aquatic Garden; BG – Bamboo Garden; DG – Duke’s Garden; JG – Japanese Garden; L – Lake; MG – Mediterranean Garden; NO – near Orangery; P – Pond; PFB – Plant Family Beds; Pi – Pinetum; RD – Rhododendron Dell; RG – Rock Garden; RK – Royal Kitchen; ReG – Redwood Grove; RoG – Rose Garden; SVP – Student Vegetables Plot; TRON – Tropical Nursery. In the case of unlocalized records, the exact situation of the host plant was not specially noted. The source of map (Fig. 1) of collecting areas was the Gardens Development Unit, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. The Fig. 1 was prepared using Corel Draw 17.1.0.572, 2014 Corel Corporation.

Sampling procedure

The investigation was conducted over a period of twelve days, from 5th to 16th June 2017. The aphids were collected directly from the host plants with a fine hair brush and placed into Eppendorf tubes containing 70% and 98% ethanol. Location, sampling date and host plant name were recorded on the labels placed onto the tubes.

Species identification

Adult wingless (apt. viv.) or winged (al. viv.) females (or aestivating larvae in the case of the genus Periphyllus van der Hoeven) were slide mounted using the method of Kanturski and Wieczorek[60] and identified to species level. The slides were examined using a Nikon Ni-U light microscope. Names and classification follow Nieto Nafría and Favret[61], with the exception of the taxonomic position of all the former Pterocommatinae, which have been placed in the tribe Macrosiphini. Samples were identified by K. Wieczorek based on morphological diagnostic features using standard literature-based keys[49,62-71]. Only small amount of samples were not identified as the immature generations (larvae or nymphs) were collected. These samples were not included into the list of species. The lists of alien Aphididae in Europe[12] were used to identify the alien species. An exclamation mark [!] beside the name denotes those species. Aliens are treated as species with native ranges outside Europe. Pest status was given according to Blackman and Eastop[1]. The aphid material is deposited in the collection of the Department of Zoology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (DZUS) and will be subsequently digitalized. Voucher specimens for collected samples in 98% ethanol are deposited in the Lab-based Collections Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, UK. The sources for the botanical nomenclature was the International Plant Names Index[72]. Supplementary Information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae.

Authors:  Chris Bass; Alin M Puinean; Christoph T Zimmer; Ian Denholm; Linda M Field; Stephen P Foster; Oliver Gutbrod; Ralf Nauen; Russell Slater; Martin S Williamson
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.714

2.  Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens.

Authors:  Philip E Hulme
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Resolving whether botanic gardens are on the road to conservation or a pathway for plant invasions.

Authors:  Philip E Hulme
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Myzus ascalonicus, an aphid recently introduced to sub-Antarctic islands, prefers native to exotic host-plants.

Authors:  M Hullé
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.377

5.  Feeding behavior of two exotic aphid species on their original hosts in a new invaded area.

Authors:  C M Lazzarotto; S M N Lazzari; S R C Penteado
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  The influence of virus-induced changes in plants on aphid vectors: insights from luteovirus pathosystems.

Authors:  Nilsa A Bosque-Pérez; Sanford D Eigenbrode
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Long-term phenological trends, species accumulation rates, aphid traits and climate: five decades of change in migrating aphids.

Authors:  James R Bell; Lynda Alderson; Daniela Izera; Tracey Kruger; Sue Parker; Jon Pickup; Chris R Shortall; Mark S Taylor; Paul Verrier; Richard Harrington
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Alien insects in Italy: comparing patterns from the regional to European level.

Authors:  Alberto F Inghilesi; Giuseppe Mazza; Rita Cervo; Francesca Gherardi; Paolo Sposimo; Elena Tricarico; Marzio Zapparoli
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Alien species pathways to the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador.

Authors:  M Verónica Toral-Granda; Charlotte E Causton; Heinke Jäger; Mandy Trueman; Juan Carlos Izurieta; Eddy Araujo; Marilyn Cruz; Kerstin K Zander; Arturo Izurieta; Stephen T Garnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.