| Literature DB >> 31292255 |
Andrew T Timberlake1,2,3,4, Sheng Chih Jin1,4, Carol Nelson-Williams1,4, Robin Wu3, Charuta G Furey1, Barira Islam5,6, Shozeb Haider5, Erin Loring1, Amy Galm7, Derek M Steinbacher3, Dawid Larysz8, David A Staffenberg2, Roberto L Flores2, Eduardo D Rodriguez2, Titus J Boggon9, John A Persing3, Richard P Lifton10,4.
Abstract
Craniosynostosis (CS) is a frequent congenital anomaly featuring the premature fusion of 1 or more sutures of the cranial vault. Syndromic cases, featuring additional congenital anomalies, make up 15% of CS. While many genes underlying syndromic CS have been identified, the cause of many syndromic cases remains unknown. We performed exome sequencing of 12 syndromic CS cases and their parents, in whom previous genetic evaluations were unrevealing. Damaging de novo or transmitted loss of function (LOF) mutations were found in 8 genes that are highly intolerant to LOF mutation (P = 4.0 × 10-8); additionally, a rare damaging mutation in SOX11, which has a lower level of intolerance, was identified. Four probands had rare damaging mutations (2 de novo) in TFAP2B, a transcription factor that orchestrates neural crest cell migration and differentiation; this mutation burden is highly significant (P = 8.2 × 10-12). Three probands had rare damaging mutations in GLI2, SOX11, or GPC4, which function in the Hedgehog, BMP, and Wnt signaling pathways; other genes in these pathways have previously been implicated in syndromic CS. Similarly, damaging de novo mutations were identified in genes encoding the chromatin modifier KAT6A, and CTNNA1, encoding catenin α-1. These findings establish TFAP2B as a CS gene, have implications for assessing risk to subsequent children in these families, and provide evidence implicating other genes in syndromic CS. This high yield indicates the value of performing exome sequencing of syndromic CS patients when sequencing of known disease loci is unrevealing.Entities:
Keywords: TFAP2B; craniofacial syndromes; craniosynostosis; de novo mutation; pleiotropy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31292255 PMCID: PMC6660739 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902041116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Enrichment of damaging de novo mutations in syndromic CS cases but not controls
| Mutation class | Observed | Expected | Enrichment | |||
| Rate | Rate | |||||
| Cases = 12, offspring studied = 13 | ||||||
| All genes | ||||||
| Total | 14 | 1.08 | 14.83 | 1.14 | 0.94 | 0.62 |
| Syn | 2 | 0.15 | 4.12 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.92 |
| T-Mis | 4 | 0.31 | 7.42 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.94 |
| D-Mis | 4 | 0.31 | 1.71 | 0.13 | 2.34 | 0.09 |
| LOF | 3 | 0.23 | 1.28 | 0.10 | 2.35 | 0.14 |
| In-frame indels | 1 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 3.36 | 0.26 |
| Damaging | 8 | 0.62 | 3.29 | 0.25 | 2.43 | 0.02 |
| LOF-intolerant genes (pLI greater than or equal to 0.9) | ||||||
| Total | 6 | 0.46 | 3.99 | 0.31 | 1.50 | 0.21 |
| Syn | 0 | 0.00 | 1.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| T-Mis | 0 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| D-Mis | 2 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 3.76 | 0.10 |
| LOF | 3 | 0.23 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 8.25 | 6.1 × 10−3 |
| In-frame indels | 1 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 11.73 | 0.08 |
| Damaging | 6 | 0.46 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 6.12 | 5.4 × 10−4 |
| Controls = 1,789 | ||||||
| All genes | ||||||
| Total | 514 | 0.29 | 537.85 | 0.30 | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| Syn | 127 | 0.07 | 145.35 | 0.08 | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| T-Mis | 275 | 0.15 | 258.58 | 0.14 | 1.06 | 0.16 |
| D-Mis | 64 | 0.04 | 72.62 | 0.04 | 0.88 | 0.86 |
| LOF | 38 | 0.02 | 49.66 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.96 |
| In-frame indels | 10 | 0.01 | 11.64 | 0.01 | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| Damaging | 112 | 0.06 | 133.92 | 0.07 | 0.84 | 0.98 |
| LOF-intolerant genes (pLI greater than or equal to 0.9) | ||||||
| Total | 514 | 0.29 | 537.85 | 0.30 | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| Syn | 127 | 0.07 | 145.35 | 0.08 | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| T-Mis | 275 | 0.15 | 258.58 | 0.14 | 1.06 | 0.16 |
| D-Mis | 64 | 0.04 | 72.62 | 0.04 | 0.88 | 0.86 |
| LOF | 38 | 0.02 | 49.66 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.96 |
| In-frame indels | 10 | 0.01 | 11.64 | 0.01 | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| Damaging | 112 | 0.06 | 133.92 | 0.07 | 0.84 | 0.98 |
LOF denotes premature termination, frameshift, or splice site mutation. Damaging includes LOF, D-Mis, and in-frame indels. P values represent the upper tail of the Poisson probability density function. Because the mutation in GPC4 was de novo in the proband’s mother, a total of 13 offspring were considered in the de novo mutation analysis for cases. D-Mis, damaging missense called by MetaSVM; N, number of de novo mutations; rate, number of de novo mutations per subject; Syn, synonymous; T-mis, tolerated missense called by MetaSVM.
Likely pathogenic variants in probands with syndromic CS
| Kindred identification | Type of CS | Gene | Impact | Inheritance | ExAC frequency | pLI |
| SAG249 | Sagittal | M1I (start loss) | Inherited (unaffected parent) | 0 | 0.99 | |
| MET268 | Metopic | K276R | De novo | 0 | 0.99 | |
| MET271 | Metopic | IVS3+2 T > A | De novo | 0 | 0.99 | |
| MET117 | Metopic | R382X | Inherited (affected parent) | 0 | 0.99 | |
| SAG250 | Sagittal and etopic | E1221X | De novo | 0 | 1 | |
| LAM108 | Lambdoid | R64H | De novo | 0 | 0.34 | |
| PSAG38 | Sagittal | A551T | De novo | 0 | 1 | |
| MET188 | Metopic | V152fs | De novo in mother | 0 | 0.95 | |
| SAG359 | Sagittal | V374_375insSWKMK | De novo | 0 | 0.97 |
Fig. 1.Probands with de novo damaging mutations in TFAP2B. Hands and faces of the 2 probands as well as pedigrees from each kindred are demonstrated in each column. Patients were diagnosed with severe trigonocephaly in early infancy, with neonatal diagnoses of brachydactyly (MET271) or clinodactyly (MET268).
Fig. 2.De novo mutation in GLI2. (A) The proband at 8 y of age, demonstrating bitemporal narrowing as a result of uncorrected sagittal synostosis. (B) T2-weighted MRI demonstrating hydrocephalus, white matter abnormalities, and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. The patient was also born with right thumb agenesis (C) and severe kyphosis and scoliosis (D and E). Hip dysplasia requiring operative management is also evident at the bottom of D. (F) The mutation p.A551T in GLI2 was only present in the proband but not in parents. (G) The crystal structure of the paralog GLI1 (18) (PDB ID code 2GLI) is shown, indicating the location of A551 within the major grove-binding Finger 4 motif and abutting the adjacent nucleotide. Structural figures were generated using Pymol (https://pymol.org/2/).
Fig. 3.De novo mutation in SOX11. (A) Note the full cheeks, everted lower lip, brachydactyly, and clinodactyly (37). Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction demonstrates R lambdoid CS. The X-ray of the hand demonstrates absence of the fifth digit distal phalanx. The proband’s sixth digit was removed early in infancy and thus, is not shown. (B) The mutation p.R64H in SOX11 was present in the proband but not in parents. (C) Analysis of sequence alignment indicates that Arg64 should function similar to the equivalent conserved arginine in SOX4 and SOX17 as a critical residue for DNA sequence recognition (25). Structural analysis of the nearly identical Sox4 in complex with DNA (PDB ID code 3U2B) (25) indicates that arginine at the location of R64 is critical for proper DNA sequence recognition.
Fig. 4.Proband with hemizygous GPC4 LOF mutation. (A) The images demonstrate trigonocephaly, a depressed nasal bridge, and a cupped right ear. (B) Pedigree of family with GPC4 LOF mutation: + represents a wild-type allele, and D represents the mutant allele of GPC4, p.V152fs. The frameshift mutation was de novo in the affected child’s mother as denoted by the star. This mutation was transmitted to her son, who was hemizygous for the GPC4 LOF mutation. Sanger sequencing traces are shown in .