| Literature DB >> 31292004 |
Naham John1, Humaira Rehman1, Suhail Razak2,3, Mehwish David1, Waheed Ullah1, Tayyaba Afsar4, Ali Almajwal4, Iftikhar Alam4, Sarwat Jahan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bisphenol A is well known endocrine-disrupting chemical while Bisphenol S was considered a safe alternative. The present study aims to examine the comparative effects of xenobiotic bisphenol-A (BPA) and its substitute bisphenol-S (BPS) on spermatogenesis and development of sexually dimorphic nucleus population of dopaminergic neurons in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus (AVPV) of the hypothalamus in male pups.Entities:
Keywords: AVPV; Bisphenol A; Bisphenol S; Endocrine disruptor; Immunohistochemistry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31292004 PMCID: PMC6621953 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-019-0491-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Comparative effects of different concentrations (2 μg/kg, 200 μg/kg) of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S on body weight (g) recorded on 8th, 16th, 24th and 28th day of development
| Groups | Day 8 | Day 16 | Day 24 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.71 ± 0.52 | 12.4 ± 0.87 | 20.5 ± 0.92 | 43.7 ± 6.54 |
| BPA (2 μg/kg) | 13.6 ± 0.65 | 21.9 ± 0.32 a** | 35.3 ± 0.60 a** | 40.1 ± 1.66 |
| BPA (200 μg/kg) | 13.0 ± 0.30 | 12.8 ± 0.87 | 19.4 ± 1.88 | 37.6 ± 3.38 |
| BPS (2 μg/kg) | 11.5 ± 0.28 | 19.9 ± 1.50 a**c*** | 28.9 ± 2.79 | 40.4 ± 0.32 |
| BPS (200 μg/kg) | 13.9 ± 0.38 | 17.2 ± 0.41 a* | 31.6 ± 2.12 a*c*** | 38.5 ± 2.05 |
Values are expressed as mean SEM *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, p*** < 0.001
a = Values vs control, b = Values vs Bisphenol A 2 μg/kg, c = Values vs Bisphenol A 200 μg/kg, d = Values vs Bisphenol S 2 μg/kg
Comparative effects of different concentrations (2 μg/kg,200 μg/kg) of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S on body organs weight
| Groups | Testes paired weight(g) | Prostate (g) | Seminal Vesicle (g) | Liver (g) | Heart (g) | Kidney (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.74 ± 0.19 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.19 | 1.90 ± 0.20 | 0.58 ± 0.22 | 0.59 ± 0.21 |
| BPA 2 μg/kg | 0.24 ± 0.01a* | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 1.90 ± 0.17 | 0.20 ± 0.01** | 0.45 ± 0.01 |
| BPA 200 μg/kg | 0.39 ± 0.17 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 1.92 ± 0.08 | 0.23 ± 0.02** | 0.49 ± 0.02 |
| BPS 2 μg/kg | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01b** | 0.09 ± 0.07 | 1.63 ± 0.13 | 0.23 ± 0.01** | 0.55 ± 0.00 |
| BPS 200 μg/kg | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01b** | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 1.43 ± 0.15 | 0.23 ± 0.02** | 0.47 ± 0.02 |
Values are expressed as mean SEM
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, p*** < 0.001
a = Values vs control, b = Values vs Bisphenol A 2 μg/kg, c = Values vs Bisphenol A 200 μg/kg, d = Values vs Bisphenol S 2 μg/kg
Mean ± SEM of seminiferous tubule diameter, tubular lumen diameter, seminiferous tubule epithelial height, tunica albuginea height of testis in control and treated groups after 28 days of treatment
| Groups | Seminiferous Tubule Diameter | Lumen Diameter | Epithelial Height | Tunica Albuginea Height | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 106.46 ± 2.94 | 84.19 ± 3.46 | 35.59 ± 0.63 | 19.79 ± 1.14 | |
| BPA 2 μg/kg | 126.03 ± 4.19a*** | 61.72 ± 3.09 a*** | 23.00 ± 0.48 a*** | 16.34 ± 0.54 | |
| BPA 200 μg/kg | 133.98 ± 3.23a*** | 71.22 ± 2.60 a** | 25.16 ± 0.48ab*** | 17.66 ± 0.90 | |
| BPS 2 μg/kg | 106.60 ± 2.46bc*** | 62.90 ± 1.77 a*** | 32.39 ± 0.54abc*** | 18.61 ± 0.63 | |
| BPS 200 μg/kg | 114.29 ± 2.45c*** | 64.86 ± 2.20 a*** | 26.55 ± 0.57abd*** | 18.19 ± 0.67 | |
Values are expressed as mean SEM
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, p*** < 0.001
a = Values vs control, b = Values vs Bisphenol A 2 μg/kg, c = Values vs Bisphenol A 200 μg/kg, d = Values vs Bisphenol S 2 μg/kg
Fig. 1Photomicroghaph of 27 days old neonatal male rat seminiferous tubules(H&E, 40X) from: (a) Control; showing normal morphology of closely packed tubules with basal lamina, stratification and increased spermatogenic epithelium Spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes and early spermatids well developed lumen, (b) BPA group treated with 2 μg/kg of dose; showing noticeable increase in interstitial spaces between destructed tubules and basal lamina, decrease in epithelial height, only spermatogonia and large lumen, (c) BPA group treated with 200 μg/kg; showing decreased tubular diameter damaged interstitial tissues and increased interstitial spaces, narrow lumen, (d) BPS 2 μg/kg treated group showing semineferious tubules without interstitial space, minimal damage to epithelial, decrease in lumen diameter, (e) BPS 200 μg/kg; showing no interstitial space, normal spermatogenesis and basal lamina around tubules and very short lumen with early spermatids. Interstitial space (IS), Spermatogonia(S), Primary spermatocytes (PS), Early spermatids (ES), Epithelial Height (EH), Interstitial tissues (IT), Basal lamina (BL), Lumen (L)
Comparison of Mean ± SEM TH-ir neuronal cells of control, estradiol, BPA 2 μg/kg, BPA 200 μg/kg, BPS 2 μg/kg, BPS 200 μg/kg treated groups, in 20 μm thick hypothalamic sections of 28 days old male rats
| Animals | Control | Estradiol 50 μg/kg | BPA 2 μg/kg | BPA 200 μg/kg | BPS 2 μg/kg | BPS 200 μg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.5 | 60.75 | 75 | 163.75 | 183 | 148 |
| 2 | 46.25 | 56.25 | 101 | 178.25 | 100.75 | 119.5 |
| 3 | 65.25 | 56.5 | 94.75 | 56.5 | 64.5 | 87 |
| TH-ir Cell Bodies | 62 ± 4.47 | 57.83 ± 3.68 | 90.25 ± 7.41b* | 175 ± 8.2abc*** | 80.08 ± 10.03d*** | 118.16 ± 10.23abd***e* |
Values are expressed as mean SEM
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, p*** < 0.001
a = Values vs control, b = Values vs Bisphenol A 2 μg/kg, c = Values vs Bisphenol A 200 μg/kg, d = Values vs Bisphenol S 2 μg/kg
Fig. 2Photomicrograph (10X) of TH-immunoreactive cells in AVPV of representative Sprague Dawley male rat pups that were neonatal treated with BPA 2 μg/kg (a), BPA 200 μg/kg (b), BPS 2 μg/kg (c), BPS 200 μg/kg (d), Control (e), Estradiol (f). Omitted controls g and h show no significance results