| Literature DB >> 31291988 |
Zhi-Peng Wen1,2,3, Wen-Jing Zeng1,2,3, Yan-Hong Chen1,2,3,4, He Li1,2,3, Jie-Ya Wang1,2,3, Quan Cheng5, Jing Yu1,2,3, Hong-Hao Zhou1,2,3, Zheng-Zheng Liu6, Jian Xiao7, Xiao-Ping Chen8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gliomas are the most common primary tumors in central nervous system. Despite advances in diagnosis and therapy, the prognosis of glioma remains gloomy. Autophagy is a cellular catabolic process that degrades proteins and damaged organelles, which is implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Autophagy related 4C cysteine peptidase (ATG4C) is an autophagy regulator responsible for cleaving of pro-LC3 and delipidation of LC3 II. This study was designed to investigate the role of ATG4C in glioma progression and temozolomide (TMZ) chemosensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: ATG4C; Autophagy; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Temozolomide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31291988 PMCID: PMC6617611 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1287-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Baseline clinical characteristics of patients
| Clinical characteristic | Prognosis analysis in gliomas | Prognosis analysis in LGG | Prognosis analysis in GBM |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO. of patients | 975 | 414 | 561 |
| Age (years) | |||
| ≥55 | 546 | 326 | 220 |
| <55 | 429 | 88 | 341 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 573 | 227 | 346 |
| Female | 402 | 187 | 215 |
| WHO grade | |||
| II | 198 | 198 | 0 |
| III | 216 | 216 | 0 |
| IV | 561 | 0 | 561 |
| IDH status | |||
| Wild | 483 | 77 | |
| Mutant | 372 | 337 | |
| Undefined | 120 | 2 | |
| MGMT status | |||
| Unmethylated | 280 | 211 | |
| Methylated | 514 | 169 | |
| Undefined | 181 | 181 | |
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of glioma patients based on ATG4C mRNA expression levels. a Comparison of overall survival (OS) profiles between patients with ATG4C high and low expression levels in 975 glioma patients. b Comparison of overall survival (OS) profiles between patients with ATG4C high and low expression levels in 414 LGG patients. c Comparison of relapse free survival (RFS) time between patients with ATG4C high and low expression levels in 414 LGG patients. d Comparison of ATG4C mRNA expression between 16 glioblastoma tissues and 9 normal brain tissues. e Comparison of the mRNA expression of ATG4C in patients with different pathological grades of gliomas
Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of factors associated with overall survival of glioma patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
|
| 0.37 (0.30–0.46) | 6.81 × 10−19 | 0.98 (0.75–1.28) | 0.88 |
| IDH mutation vs wild | 0.13 (0.10–0.17) | 6.05 × 10−51 | 0.40 (0.26–0.63 | 6.40 × 10− 5 |
| Grade III vs Grade II | 3.20 (1.93–5.29) | 5.86 × 10−6 | 2.44 (1.44–4.12) | 9.34 × 10−4 |
| Grade IV vs Grade II | 14.28 (9.14–22.32) | 1.88 × 10− 31 | 5.02 (2.70–9.36) | 3.71 × 10−6 |
| Age | 1.06 (1.05–1.06) | 7.91 × 10−58 | 1.05 (1.03–1.06) | 3.85 × 10− 15 |
| Gender | 1.13 (0.94–1.35) | 0.19 | 1.51 (1.17–1.93) | 0.014 |
| 0.41 (0.35–0.48) | 2.95 × 10− 30 | 1.17 (0.79–1.73) | 0.43 | |
| 0.47 (0.40–0.54) | 4.50 × 10−24 | 0.98 (0.75–1.27) | 0.86 | |
| 1.42 (1.10–1.84) | 0.008 | 0.63 (0.40–0.99) | 0.05 | |
| 2.37 (2.02–2.79) | 1.04 × 10− 25 | 0.90 (0.64–1.28) | 0.56 | |
| 1.48 (1.27–1.73) | 9.91 × 10− 7 | 1.54 (1.16–2.01) | 3 × 10− 3 | |
| 1.74 (1.43–2.13) | 4.32 × 10− 8 | 0.61 (0.43–0.86) | 5 × 10−3 | |
| 2.32 (1.89–2.86) | 1.66 × 10− 15 | 1.36 (0.94–1.98) | 0.1 | |
| 0.42 (0.34–0.51) | 7.05 × 10− 17 | 0.74 (0.49–1.13) | 0.16 | |
| 1.44 (1.33–1.57) | 1.57 × 10− 18 | 0.97 (0.88–1.07) | 0.52 | |
| 2.18 (1.86–2.55) | 1.08 × 10− 21 | 1.11 (0.82–1.41) | 0.50 | |
| 2.05 (1.62–2.61) | 4.59 × 10− 9 | 0.998 (0.66–1.52) | 0.99 | |
| 3.17 (2.53–3.97) | 8.53 × 10−24 | 1.01 (0.77–1.09) | 0.96 | |
| 0.78 (0.70–0.88) | 7.22 × 10−5 | 0.92 (0.77–1.09) | 0.34 | |
Comparison of distribution of clinical factors between glioma patients with high and low ATG4C mRNA expression
| Clinical characteristic | NO. of patients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ATG4C low expression | ATG4C high expression | ||
| NO. of cases | 487 | 488 | |
| Age (years) | |||
| ≥ 55 | 297 (60.99%) | 249 (51.02%) | 0.002 |
| < 55 | 190 (39.01%) | 239 (48.98%) | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 279 (57.29%) | 294 (60.25%) | 0.348 |
| Female | 208 (42.71%) | 194 (39.75%) | |
| WHO grade | |||
| II | 121 (24.85%) | 77 (15.78%) | 0.000 |
| III | 120 (24.64%) | 96 (19.67%) | |
| IV | 246 (50.51%) | 315 (64.55%) | |
| IDH status | |||
| Wild | 185 (37.99%) | 130 (26.64%) | 0.000 |
| Mutant | 242 (49.69%) | 298 (61.07%) | |
| Undefined | 60 (12.32%) | 60 (12.30%) | |
| MGMT status | |||
| Unmethylated | 110 (22.59%) | 224 (45.90%) | 0.000 |
| Methylated | 290 (59.55%) | 170 (34.84%) | |
| Undefined | 87 (17.86%) | 94 (19.26%) | |
Fig. 2Knockdown of ATG4C inhibited the proliferation of glioma cells. a-b ATG4C siRNAs interference efficiency was tested at both mRNA and protein levels. c ATG4C knockdown by si-ATG4C transfection suppressed the proliferation of glioma cells in a time-dependent manner. d ATG4C knockdown by si-ATG4C transfection impaired clone formation ability of glioma cells. Left panel: representative crystal violet staining images; right panel: quantitative analysis of colony numbers. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant
Fig. 3Influence of ATG4C knockdown on cell cycle and the expression of cell-cycle related proteins in glioma cells. a-b Changes in proportion of cells in G1 phase with ATG4C depletion. c Changes in protein expression of p21 and p53 by ATG4C depletion
Fig. 4Knockdown of ATG4C suppressed autophagy and autophagic flux. a, b ATG4C stable knockdown glioma cells were established by lentivirus infection, and the interference efficiency was detected by Western blot analysis. c Protein expression of LC3-II and P62 in glioma cells transfected with si-ATG4C. d, e Knockdown of ATG4C on the expression of LC3-II in the presence of BafA1. f Transmission electron microscopy observation of cellular ultrastructure tin T98G cells by ATG4C depletion. Arrows indicate autophagic vacuoles. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant
Fig. 5Knockdown of ATG4C promoted apoptosis and increased ROS accumulation in T98G cells. a-b The apoptosis in T98G cell transfected with si-ATG4C was detected by Annevin-V and Hoechst 33342 staining, respectively. c Changes in protein levels of cleaved-PARP, BAX and Bcl-2 expression in T98G cells transfected with ATG4C siRNAs. d Changes in Caspase-3/6/9 activity in T98G cells transfected with ATG4C siRNAs. e Changes in ROS levels in T98G cells transfected with ATG4C siRNAs. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant
Fig. 6Knockdown of ATG4C enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity in glioma cells by suppressing autophagy. a Both LC3-II/LC3-I ratio and LC3-II expression were increased and P62 expression was decreased in glioma cells treated with TMZ. b The number of yellow puncta was elevated in glioma cells treated with TMZ. c The expression of ATGs mRNA were increased in glioma cells treated with TMZ. d Knockdown of ATG4C by sh-ATG4C decreased the expression of LC3-II in the presence of BafA1 in glioma cells treated with TMZ. e Knockdown of ATG4C by sh-ATG4C decreased the number of green puncta (red arrows) in glioma cells treated with TMZ. f Knockdown of ATG4C by sh-ATG4C increased TMZ cytotoxicity in glioma cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant
Fig. 7Knockdown of ATG4C by sh-ATG4C suppressed xenograft tumor and the graphic abstract. a-b The growth of glioma was restricted in nude mice by ATG4C knockdown. c Knockdown of ATG4C decreased the xenograft weights. d Depletion of ATG4C reduced the expression of Ki67, LC3 and ATG4C protein in xenograft. e Graph depicts the role of ATG4C in glioma progression and TMZ sensitivity