Literature DB >> 31291471

Changes in colorectal cancer screening use after introduction of alternative screening offer in Germany: Prospective cohort study.

Feng Guo1,2, Chen Chen1,2, Ben Schöttker1,3, Bernd Holleczek4, Michael Hoffmeister1, Hermann Brenner1,5,6.   

Abstract

In October 2002, screening colonoscopy was added to the German colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program as an alternative to fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We aimed to evaluate the change in CRC screening use after introduction of the dual screening offer and to assess determinants of screening use. Data were drawn from a population-based cohort study initiated during 2000-2002 in Germany (n = 5,845, age range at recruitment: 50-75 years). We conducted both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to obtain uptake rates of CRC screening based on four waves of data. Age-group specific proportions of participants having had FOBT within 2 years remained essentially unchanged at 61-67% between 2000 and 2002 (1st wave) and 2005-2007 (3rd wave). The proportions of participants having undergone screening colonoscopy within 10 years increased from 23-29% to 46-57%, leading to a substantial overall increase in being up-to-date with CRC screening from 66-68% to 77-80%. In 2008-2010 (4th wave), FOBT use declined and colonoscopy use continued to increase. Obesity was significantly associated with lower prevalence of being up-to-date with FOBT (odds ratio [OR] at 8-year follow-up 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.80) and screening colonoscopy (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86). Also, smokers were less likely to have ever used FOBT (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75) or colonoscopy (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90) compared to nonsmokers. After the introduction of dual screening offer, the overall adherence to CRC screening steeply increased, mainly due to an increase in screening colonoscopy uptake. Screening tests kept being underused by obese people and smokers who are at elevated CRC risk.
© 2019 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; determinant; fecal occult blood test; screening colonoscopy; uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31291471     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

1.  Impact of demographic changes and screening colonoscopy on long-term projection of incident colorectal cancer cases in Germany: A modelling study.

Authors:  Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hanna Tillmanns; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  The Association Between Inflammation, Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness in Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Inese Briede; Ilze Strumfa; Andrejs Vanags; Janis Gardovskis
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2020-01-08

3.  Colorectal Cancer Risk by Genetic Variants in Populations With and Without Colonoscopy History.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Xuechen Chen; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-01-23

4.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Factors Associated with Participation in Stool Based Colorectal Screening in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Lydiana Kadir; Zakaria Kamis; Norhayati Kassim; Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Jackson Tan; Elvynna Leong; Sok King Ong; Chee Fui Chong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.