| Literature DB >> 31291290 |
Elena Heidenreich1, Robin Wördenweber2, Frank Kirschhöfer1, Michael Nusser1, Frank Friedrich3, Kirsten Fahl4, Olaf Kruse2, Björn Rost5,6, Matthias Franzreb1, Gerald Brenner-Weiß1, Sebastian Rokitta5.
Abstract
Owing to the hierarchical organization of biology, from genomes over transcriptomes and proteomes down to metabolomes, there is continuous debate about the extent to which data and interpretations derived from one level, e.g. the transcriptome, are in agreement with other levels, e.g. the metabolome. Here, we tested the effect of ocean acidification (OA; 400 vs. 1000 μatm CO2) and its modulation by light intensity (50 vs. 300 μmol photons m-2 s-1) on the biomass composition (represented by 75 key metabolites) of diploid and haploid life-cycle stages of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (RCC1216 and RCC1217) and compared these data with interpretations from previous physiological and gene expression screenings. The metabolite patterns showed minor responses to OA in both life-cycle stages. Whereas previous gene expression analyses suggested that the observed increased biomass buildup derived from lipid and carbohydrate storage, this dataset suggests that OA slightly increases overall biomass of cells, but does not significantly alter their metabolite composition. Generally, light was shown to be a more dominant driver of metabolite composition than OA, increasing the relative abundances of amino acids, mannitol and storage lipids, and shifting pigment contents to accommodate increased irradiance levels. The diploid stage was shown to contain vastly more osmolytes and mannitol than the haploid stage, which in turn had a higher relative content of amino acids, especially aromatic ones. Besides the differences between the investigated cell types and the general effects on biomass buildup, our analyses indicate that OA imposes only negligible effects on E. huxleyi´s biomass composition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31291290 PMCID: PMC6619986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Growth rates.
Diploid and haploid E. huxleyi life-cycle stages under present-day pCO2 (empty bars, 400 μatm) and elevated pCO2 (hatched bars, 1000 μatm) as well as low and high light intensities. Error bars denote 1 SD (n = 3). Significances were determined via Student’s t-test, * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01.
Fig 2SEM images of E. huxleyi (RCC1216) coccospheres.
A) Low light, 400 μatm pCO2 B) High light, 400 μatm pCO2 C) Low light, 1000 μatm pCO2 D) High light, 1000 μatm pCO2. All scalebars 5 μm. Estimates on size diameter are based on metric assessments (n = 33–40 cells). E) Average cell diameter of diploid cells under the different treatments.
Fig 3Heatmap of fold-changes of metabolites.
Fold-changes of metabolites in different pCO2 (400 vs. 1000 μatm CO2) and light acclimations (LL vs. HL, i.e., 50 vs. 300 μmol photons m-2 s-1) for diploid (2N) and haploid (1N) E. huxleyi life-cycle stages. Fold-changes of the mean values of three biological replicates were calculated. Increases are indicated in red, decreases in blue, grey boxes indicate that the metabolite was not detected in the sample. Asterisks represent p-values as determined via Student’s t-test (* represents p-values ≤0.05, ** represents p-values ≤0.01). Slashes ‘/’ indicate manually added fold-change tendencies for metabolites where the fold-change could not be calculated due to metabolites being absent or lower than the detection limit in one of the treatments. A) Metabolite fold-change per cell, B) Metabolite fold-change per POC.