Literature DB >> 31290763

Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Elisabeth Dupont1, Theodore Tsangaris2, Carlos Garcia-Cantu3, Marissa Howard-McNatt4, Akiko Chiba4, Adam C Berger2, Edward A Levine4, Jennifer S Gass5, Kristalyn Gallagher6, Sharon S Lum7, Ricardo D Martinez3, Alliric I Willis2, Sonali V Pandya5, Eric A Brown8, Andrew Fenton9, Amanda Mendiola9, Mary Murray9, Naveenraj L Solomon7, Maheswari Senthil7, David W Ollila6, David Edmonson5, Melissa Lazar2, Jukes P Namm7, Fangyong Li10, Meghan Butler10, Noreen E McGowan1, Maria E Herrera3, Yoana P Avitan6, Brian Yoder11, Laura L Walters8, Tara McPartland10, Anees B Chagpar10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Single-center studies have demonstrated that resection of cavity shave margins (CSM) halves the rate of positive margins and re-excision in breast cancer patients undergoing partial mastectomy (PM). We sought to determine if these findings were externally generalizable across practice settings.
METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial occurring in 9 centers across the United States, stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing PM were randomly assigned to either have resection of CSM ("shave" group) or not ("no shave" group). Randomization occurred intraoperatively, after the surgeon had completed their standard PM. Primary outcome measures were positive margin and re-excision rates.
RESULTS: Between July 28, 2016 and April 13, 2018, 400 patients were enrolled in this trial. Four patients (2 in each arm) did not meet inclusion criteria after randomization, leaving 396 patients for analysis: 196 in the "shave" group and 200 to the "no shave" group. Median patient age was 65 years (range; 29-94). Groups were well matched at baseline for demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Prior to randomization, positive margin rates were similar in the "shave" and "no shave" groups (76/196 (38.8%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), respectively, P = 0.604). After randomization, those in the "shave" group were significantly less likely than those in the "no shave" group to have positive margins (19/196 (9.7%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), P < 0.001), and to require re-excision or mastectomy for margin clearance (17/196 (8.7%) vs. 47/200 (23.5%), P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Resection of CSM significantly reduces positive margin and re-excision rates in patients undergoing PM.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31290763     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  4 in total

1.  Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Alison Savitz; Liisa L Lyon; Patricia E Palacios; Brooke Vuong; Maihgan A Kavanagh; Gillian E Kuehner; Sharon B Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Breast-conserving surgery with 3D-printed surgical guide: a single-center, prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Wu; Hee Jeong Kim; Jongwon Lee; Il Yong Chung; Jisun Kim; Saebyeol Lee; Byung Ho Son; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Hak Hee Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Jae Ho Jeong; Gyungyub Gong; Namkug Kim; BeomSeok Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Assessment of Surgeon Factors Associated With Margin Re-excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffery M Chakedis; Sharon B Chang; Annie Tang; Gillian E Kuehner; Alison C Savitz; Brooke Vuong; Maihgan A Kavanagh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Reoperation rate after breast conserving surgery as quality indicator in breast cancer treatment: A reappraisal.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Furio Maggiorotto; Caterina Marchiò; Davide Balmativola; Alessandra Magistris; Franziska Kubatzki; Paola Sgandurra; Maria Rosaria Di Virgilio; Daniele Regge; Filippo Montemurro; Marco Gatti; Anna Sapino; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.