Literature DB >> 31290689

Awareness and acceptability of Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials core outcome set for chronic pain among surveyed neuropathic pain authors.

Svjetlana Dosenovic1,2, Zrinka Nikolic2, Bozena Ivancev1, Antonia Jelicic Kadic2,3, Livia Puljak4.   

Abstract

Aim: We assessed the knowledge and adoption of Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT)-recommended core outcome set (COS) and core outcome measures (COM) among authors of systematic reviews (SR) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) about interventions for neuropathic pain (NeuP).
Methods: NeuP SR and RCT authors identified via a systematic literature search were surveyed.
Results: The response rate was low. Although majority of respondents were familiar with the IMMPACT COS, only 61% of SR authors and 40% of RCT authors used the COS. The main perceived obstacle that prevented the adoption of the COS was the lack of awareness of the full IMMPACT COS.
Conclusion: The adoption of IMMPACT-recommended COS and COM among NeuP authors was inadequate and their appropriateness needs to be further evaluated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMMPACT; core outcome measures; core outcome set; initiative on methods, measurement and pain assessment in clinical trials; neuropathic pain; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31290689     DOI: 10.2217/cer-2018-0123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  1 in total

1.  A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.

Authors:  Karen L Hughes; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 6.437

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.