Literature DB >> 31290258

Aquatic microbial diversity associated with faecal pollution of Norwegian waterbodies characterized by 16S rRNA gene amplicon deep sequencing.

Lisa Paruch1, Adam M Paruch1, Hans Geir Eiken1, Roald Sørheim1.   

Abstract

Faecal contamination is one of the major factors affecting biological water quality. In this study, we investigated microbial taxonomic diversity of faecally polluted lotic ecosystems in Norway. These ecosystems comprise tributaries of drinking water reservoirs with moderate and high faecal contamination levels, an urban creek exposed to extremely high faecal pollution and a rural creek that was the least faecally polluted. The faecal water contamination had both anthropogenic and zoogenic origins identified through quantitative microbial source tracking applying host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers. The microbial community composition revealed that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes (70-90% relative abundance) were the most dominant bacterial phyla, followed by Firmicutes, especially in waters exposed to anthropogenic faecal contamination. The core archaeal community consisted of Parvarchaeota (mainly in the tributaries of drinking water reservoirs) and Crenarchaeota (in the rural creek). The aquatic microbial diversity was substantially reduced in water with severe faecal contamination. In addition, the community compositions diverge between waters with dominant anthropogenic or zoogenic pollution origins. These findings present novel interpretations of the effect of anthropo-zoogenic faecal water contamination on microbial diversity in lotic ecosystems.
© 2019 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31290258      PMCID: PMC6801177          DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Biotechnol        ISSN: 1751-7915            Impact factor:   5.813


Introduction

Faecal water contamination originates from anthropogenic and zoogenic sources associated with both point (typically, sewage and wastewater discharges) and nonpoint/diffuse (mostly storm/urban/agricultural water runoff) pollution. In addition, the contamination occurs in groundwater and surface waterbodies through direct (faeces and droppings) and indirect (organic fertilization, drainage and irrigation of soil and vegetation) pathways. These are the main transmission routes to water environments for various microbiota species derived from faecal pollution (Paruch and Paruch, 2018). The multiple sources and origins of faecal water contamination create substantial challenges for engineers and scientists in applying adequate measures for managing and treating polluted waters, assessing water quality status and protecting aquatic environments. In response to these, microbial source tracking (MST) methods using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have been widely implemented into practice. The qPCR‐based MST techniques detect and quantify host‐specific genetic markers, which determine the origins of faecal pollution. The most tested, validated and applied markers in aquatic research are those derived from Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genes (Hagedorn et al., 2011; Reischer et al., 2013; Harwood et al., 2014; Staley et al., 2016; Paruch et al., 2017; Sowah et al., 2017). Surface water environments are more vulnerable to contamination than groundwater, and their microbial profiles represent the most important indicators of biological water quality. It is therefore highly important to assess faecal contamination impact (with particular emphasis on anthropogenic and zoogenic origins) on the profile of aquatic microbiota in the natural water ecosystems. In this regard, next‐generation sequencing (NGS), for example Illumina MiSeq, has been successfully employed for the characterization of microbial community structure (Wang et al., 2016; Calderón et al., 2017; Parulekar et al., 2017). Yet, the composition of aquatic microbiota impacted by faecal pollution remains sparsely addressed. More specifically, there are no available published data focusing on the impacts of both anthropogenic and zoogenic faecal sources on microbial population in natural waters. The most relevant studies investigated bacterial diversity in either lentic waters or benthic microbiota in marine ecosystems exposed only to anthropogenic pollution (Zinger et al., 2012; Zeglin, 2015; Ibekwe et al., 2016; Calderón et al., 2017; Parulekar et al., 2017). Therefore, more comprehensive studies, which can provide a better overview of the diversity of various microbial communities impacted by faecal pollution in lotic environments, are needed (Zinger et al., 2012). In this study, we focused on investigating microbial community changes under the pressure of anthropo‐zoogenic faecal water contamination in different lotic ecosystems. The core research question we set out to address was the following: does faecal water pollution increase or decrease the aquatic microbial diversity in lotic environments?

Results and discussion

Origins of faecal contamination in lotic waters

Various lotic ecosystems (comprising a rural creek – RC, an urban creek – UC and three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs – T1, T2 and T3) were investigated, and all of them revealed constant exposure to faecal pollution based on Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations. Therefore, our main focus was given to the most distinctive samples exposing extreme variation in E. coli counts (lowest vs. highest) and those with divergent origins of faecal pollution. The origin (anthropogenic and zoogenic/environmental) was defined through quantitative microbial source tracking (QMST) using host‐specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers (AllBac – universal marker, BacHhuman, BacR – ruminant and Hor‐Bac – horse) and was further presented as the percentage contribution profile of the markers in faecal pollution. The methodology of contribution profiling and its scientific background have been described in greater detail elsewhere (Paruch et al., 2015). Although there are no significant correlations between E. coli and the Bacteroidales genetic markers (Harwood et al., 2014), molecular diagnostics using these markers are quite prevalent in the identification of the origin of faecal water contamination. Bacteroidales bacteria, especially species of the genus Bacteroides, constitute the majority of the population of gastrointestinal microbes. Normally, these species comprise one third of total faecal bacteria, but they can extend to over half the portion of human faecal flora, constituting 1011 organisms in a gram of faeces (McQuaig et al., 2012). The lowest E. coli concentrations were found in the rural creek (RC), where the contribution profile of the tested Bacteroidales DNA markers showed a predominantly zoogenic origin (Table 1). A converse profile was determined in the urban creek (UC), which had faecal contamination of a predominantly anthropogenic origin and extremely high E. coli numbers. Relatively high E. coli concentrations were also found in the tributaries of drinking water reservoirs (T1, T2 and T3), where the contribution profile of genetic markers in faecal water contamination exposed a dominant zoogenic origin (Table 1).
Table 1

The lowest and highest concentrations of Escherichia coli (E. coli) expressed as the most probable number (MPN) in 100 ml of water sampled from various lotic ecosystems (a rural creek – RC, an urban creek – UC and three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs – T1, T2 and T3)

Study sites E. coli concentrationsNumber of samples per dominant origin of faecal water contaminationTotal number of tested samples
AnthropogenicZoogenic
RC1–144.51910
UC560–20 0508210
T11–200.521315
T22–200.501010
T32–200.521315
The lowest and highest concentrations of Escherichia coli (E. coli) expressed as the most probable number (MPN) in 100 ml of water sampled from various lotic ecosystems (a rural creek – RC, an urban creek – UC and three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs – T1, T2 and T3)

Microbial taxonomic diversity of faecally polluted lotic ecosystems

The microbial diversity of the various lotic ecosystems was investigated using Illumina MiSeq sequencing on 16S rRNA amplicon libraries. A range of 1 267 757 to 1 850 305 reads were obtained per single sample investigated. After quality filtering and paired‐end sequence assembly, 615 567 unique reads were used to characterize 49 107 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These OTUs were further classified into 74 microbial phyla, with a majority of bacteria (71) and three archaeal phyla. Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the dominant populations (constituting 70–90% relative abundance) in the investigated lotic ecosystems. In addition, the typical human gastrointestinal microbiota represented by Firmicutes (Goodrich et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2017) was highly distinctive in the UC ecosystem. Over 50% of this phylum was represented by the genus Faecalibacterium, an essential bacterium in the human gut (Miquel et al., 2013). This specific finding clearly indicates the impact of human faecal contamination on aquatic microbial diversity, and it is in agreement with the results from QMST, demonstrating the dominant anthropogenic origin of faecal pollution in the UC ecosystem (Table 1). Such a relationship was recently reported by Sun et al. (2017), revealing an anthropogenic source (wastewater discharge) of Firmicutes in the Yangtze River. Parvarchaeota and Crenarchaeota were the main archaeal population of the investigated ecosystems. The exclusive predominance (up to 86% relative abundance) of Parvarchaeota was revealed in all three tributaries (T1, T2 and T3), while Crenarchaeota constituted the second largest phylum, representing up to 44% relative abundance in RC ecosystem. This phylum was largely dominated by the genus Candidatus Nitrososphaera, which responds positively to nitrogen fertilization and farmyard manure (Zhalnina et al., 2013). This finding is associated with the lotic RC ecosystem in the agricultural catchment, where the QMST revealed a zoogenic origin of faecal water contamination (Table 1). Rarefaction estimation as plotted in Fig. 1 discloses alpha diversity variations across the lotic ecosystems. The most diverse microbial composition was detected in the least faecally polluted ecosystem, while the highest decline of diversity was revealed in the extremely highly contaminated water, that is in ecosystems RC and UC respectively. These variations expose a remarkably negative impact of faecal pollution on aquatic microbial community structure. This can be related to various stress factors accompanying faecal water contamination that affect the basic ecological processes of ecosystems, leading to suppression of some microbes and enrichment of others, disruption in natural processes of biodegradation, water flow and nutrient availabilities. A negative response of the aquatic microbial community to the combined impacts of organic and inorganic pollutants, and variations in temperature, oxygen, salinity, acidification, nutrient and organic matter variabilities have been widely observed (Van Horn et al., 2011; Pratt et al., 2012; Mahmoudi et al., 2015; Ibekwe et al., 2016; Mesa et al., 2017; Yao et al., 2017).
Figure 1

Diversity measures in the lotic ecosystems (a rural creek – RC, an urban creek – UC and three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs – T1, T2 and T3). Phylogenetic alpha diversity (A) estimated from the rarefaction analysis expressing microbial species richness in each ecosystem. Beta diversity heat map (B) with hierarchical clustering of the ecosystems based on the microbial variety estimated through the Euclidean distance criterion. Both alpha and beta diversity were analysed using CLC Microbial Genomics Module version 2.5.1 (CLC Bio, QIAGEN Company, Aarhus, Denmark).

Diversity measures in the lotic ecosystems (a rural creek – RC, an urban creek – UC and three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs – T1, T2 and T3). Phylogenetic alpha diversity (A) estimated from the rarefaction analysis expressing microbial species richness in each ecosystem. Beta diversity heat map (B) with hierarchical clustering of the ecosystems based on the microbial variety estimated through the Euclidean distance criterion. Both alpha and beta diversity were analysed using CLC Microbial Genomics Module version 2.5.1 (CLC Bio, QIAGEN Company, Aarhus, Denmark). A heat map of beta diversity (Fig. 1) illustrates the similarity/relatedness of the studied ecosystems in terms of their microbial community features. The performed hierarchical clustering was statistically significant (P‐value = 0.00097) as revealed by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). A group of two closely related clusters composed of ecosystems T1–T2 and RC–T3 was identified. Distinguishably, the UC ecosystem exhibited noticeable divergent microbial structure in comparison with the aforementioned group and stands as a separate cluster. This analysis clearly unveils that microbiota in the most faecally contaminated UC ecosystem, influenced mostly by the anthropogenic pollution sources (Table 1), was greatly deviated from the other ecosystems. Furthermore, a typical human gastrointestinal microbiome characterized mainly by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Synergistetes, Tenericutes and Fusobacteria (David et al., 2014; Goodrich et al., 2014; Rowland et al., 2018) was predominant in the UC ecosystem. This again correlates strongly with the outcomes of the QMST tests identifying the primarily human origin of faecal water contamination in this ecosystem (Table 1). Both analytical and statistical tests validate the results of this study, which as a whole presents novel interpretations of the effect of anthropo‐zoogenic faecal pollution on aquatic microbial diversity in lotic waters. The outcomes clearly answer the research question addressed in this work by demonstrating a substantial reduction of the microbial diversity in water with severe faecal contamination. In addition, the study shows that the community compositions are distinct between ecosystems exposed to anthropogenic or zoogenic pollution. To conclude, the primary finding obtained in the current study is that the higher faecal water contamination the lower aquatic microbial diversity.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Two decades of describing the unseen majority of aquatic microbial diversity.

Authors:  Lucie Zinger; Angélique Gobet; Thomas Pommier
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Norwegian study on microbial source tracking for water quality control and pollution removal in constructed wetland treating catchment run-off.

Authors:  Lisa Paruch; Adam M Paruch; Anne-Grete Buseth Blankenberg; Ketil Haarstad; Trond Mæhlum
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 3.  Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health.

Authors:  S Miquel; R Martín; O Rossi; L G Bermúdez-Humarán; J M Chatel; H Sokol; M Thomas; J M Wells; P Langella
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Microbial community composition and diversity in Caspian Sea sediments.

Authors:  Nagissa Mahmoudi; Michael S Robeson; Hector F Castro; Julian L Fortney; Stephen M Techtmann; Dominique C Joyner; Charles J Paradis; Susan M Pfiffner; Terry C Hazen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  PLFA analyses of microbial communities associated with PAH-contaminated riverbank sediment.

Authors:  Brenda Pratt; Roland Riesen; Carl G Johnston
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Lawrence A David; Corinne F Maurice; Rachel N Carmody; David B Gootenberg; Julie E Button; Benjamin E Wolfe; Alisha V Ling; A Sloan Devlin; Yug Varma; Michael A Fischbach; Sudha B Biddinger; Rachel J Dutton; Peter J Turnbaugh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Microbiome and metabolic disease: revisiting the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Johnson; Stacey L Heaver; William A Walters; Ruth E Ley
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Bacterial, Archaeal, and Eukaryotic Diversity across Distinct Microhabitats in an Acid Mine Drainage.

Authors:  Victoria Mesa; Jose L R Gallego; Ricardo González-Gil; Béatrice Lauga; Jesús Sánchez; Celia Méndez-García; Ana I Peláez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components.

Authors:  Ian Rowland; Glenn Gibson; Almut Heinken; Karen Scott; Jonathan Swann; Ines Thiele; Kieran Tuohy
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Performance characteristics of qPCR assays targeting human- and ruminant-associated bacteroidetes for microbial source tracking across sixteen countries on six continents.

Authors:  Georg H Reischer; James E Ebdon; Johanna M Bauer; Nathalie Schuster; Warish Ahmed; Johan Aström; Anicet R Blanch; Günter Blöschl; Denis Byamukama; Tricia Coakley; Christobel Ferguson; Goraw Goshu; Gwangpyo Ko; Ana Maria de Roda Husman; Douglas Mushi; Ramiro Poma; Bandana Pradhan; Veronica Rajal; Margit A Schade; Regina Sommer; Huw Taylor; Erika M Toth; Virgil Vrajmasu; Stefan Wuertz; Robert L Mach; Andreas H Farnleitner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bacteria, archae, fungi and viruses: it takes a community to eliminate waste.

Authors:  José Angel Siles; Carmen Michán
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.