Literature DB >> 31290057

Impact of reduced-representation sequencing protocols on detecting population structure in a threatened marsupial.

B R Wright1, C E Grueber1,2, M J Lott1,3, K Belov1, R N Johnson1,3, C J Hogg4.   

Abstract

Reduced-representation sequencing methods have wide utility in conservation genetics of non-model species. Several methods are now available that reduce genome complexity to examine a wide range of markers in a large number of individuals. We produced two datasets collected using different laboratory techniques, comprising a common set of samples from the greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis). We examined the impact of differing data filtering thresholds on downstream population inferences. We found that choice of restriction enzyme and data filtering thresholds, especially the rate of allowable missing data, impacted our ability to detect population structure. Estimates of FST were robust to alterations in laboratory and bioinformatic protocols while principal coordinates and STRUCTURE analyses showed variation according to the number of loci and percent missing data. We advise researchers using reduced-representation sequencing in conservation projects to examine a range of data thresholds, and follow these through to downstream population inferences. Multiple measures of population differentiation should be used in order to fully understand how data filtering thresholds influence the final dataset, paying particular attention to the impact of allowable missing data. Our results indicate that failure to follow these checks could impact conclusions drawn, and conservation management decisions made.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data filtering; FST; Principal coordinates analyses; Reduced representation sequencing; Restriction enzymes; Threatened species management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31290057     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-019-04966-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  5 in total

1.  How Should Genes and Taxa be Sampled for Phylogenomic Analyses with Missing Data? An Empirical Study in Iguanian Lizards.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Streicher; James A Schulte; John J Wiens
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  RADseq underestimates diversity and introduces genealogical biases due to nonrandom haplotype sampling.

Authors:  B Arnold; R B Corbett-Detig; D Hartl; K Bomblies
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Unforeseen Consequences of Excluding Missing Data from Next-Generation Sequences: Simulation Study of RAD Sequences.

Authors:  Huateng Huang; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 4.  Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Kimberly R Andrews; Jeffrey M Good; Michael R Miller; Gordon Luikart; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  In vivo relaxation of N-acetyl-aspartate, creatine plus phosphocreatine, and choline containing compounds during the course of brain infarction: a proton MRS study.

Authors:  P Gideon; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.546

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Genome wide analysis reveals genetic divergence between Goldsinny wrasse populations.

Authors:  Eeva Jansson; Francois Besnier; Ketil Malde; Carl André; Geir Dahle; Kevin A Glover
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 2.  Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Frederick I Archer; Laura D Bertola; Jason G Bragg; Martin F Breed; Michael W Bruford; Melinda A Coleman; Robert Ekblom; W Chris Funk; Catherine E Grueber; Brian K Hand; Rodolfo Jaffé; Evelyn Jensen; Jeremy S Johnson; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Anna J MacDonald; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Frank Muller-Karger; David O'Brien; Ivan Paz-Vinas; Kevin M Potter; Orly Razgour; Cristiano Vernesi; Margaret E Hunter
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-04-12

3.  An empirical comparison of population genetic analyses using microsatellite and SNP data for a species of conservation concern.

Authors:  Shawna J Zimmerman; Cameron L Aldridge; Sara J Oyler-McCance
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.