Jan Neumann1,2, Kai Kern3, Dong Sun3, Sarah C Foreman3, Gabby B Joseph3, Alexandra S Gersing3,4, Michael C Nevitt5, Charles E McCulloch5, Azien Quitzke6, Thomas M Link3. 1. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA. jan.neumann@tum.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. jan.neumann@tum.de. 3. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent of cartilage deterioration in knees with prior meniscal resection related to trauma versus knees with resection related to degenerative disease, and to compare cartilage deterioration in knees with meniscal surgery to knees without meniscal surgery, controlling for prior knee trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed cartilage deterioration in right knees of Osteoarthritis Initiative participants: (i) with meniscal surgery due to injury (n = 79); (ii) matched control knees with a prior injury but without meniscal surgery (n = 79); (iii) with meniscal surgery but without preceding injury (n = 36); and (iv) matched control knees without meniscal surgery or prior knee injury (n = 36). Cartilage composition was measured using T2 measurements derived using semi-automatic cartilage segmentation of the right. Linear regression analysis was used to compare compartmental values of T2 between groups. RESULTS: Comparing the mean T2 values in surgical cases with and without injury our results did not show significant differences (group i vs. iii, p > 0.05). However, knees with previous meniscal surgery showed significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean T2 values across all compartments (i.e., global T2) when compared to those without meniscal surgery for both knees with a history of trauma (group i vs. ii) and knees without prior trauma (group iii vs. iv). Similar results were obtained when analyzing the compartments separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage deterioration, assessed by T2, is similar in knees undergoing meniscal surgery after trauma and for degenerative conditions. Both groups demonstrated greater cartilage deterioration than nonsurgical knees, controlling for prior knee injury.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent of cartilage deterioration in knees with prior meniscal resection related to trauma versus knees with resection related to degenerative disease, and to compare cartilage deterioration in knees with meniscal surgery to knees without meniscal surgery, controlling for prior knee trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed cartilage deterioration in right knees of Osteoarthritis Initiative participants: (i) with meniscal surgery due to injury (n = 79); (ii) matched control knees with a prior injury but without meniscal surgery (n = 79); (iii) with meniscal surgery but without preceding injury (n = 36); and (iv) matched control knees without meniscal surgery or prior knee injury (n = 36). Cartilage composition was measured using T2 measurements derived using semi-automatic cartilage segmentation of the right. Linear regression analysis was used to compare compartmental values of T2 between groups. RESULTS: Comparing the mean T2 values in surgical cases with and without injury our results did not show significant differences (group i vs. iii, p > 0.05). However, knees with previous meniscal surgery showed significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean T2 values across all compartments (i.e., global T2) when compared to those without meniscal surgery for both knees with a history of trauma (group i vs. ii) and knees without prior trauma (group iii vs. iv). Similar results were obtained when analyzing the compartments separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage deterioration, assessed by T2, is similar in knees undergoing meniscal surgery after trauma and for degenerative conditions. Both groups demonstrated greater cartilage deterioration than nonsurgical knees, controlling for prior knee injury.
Authors: Mohamed Jarraya; Frank W Roemer; Martin Englund; Michel D Crema; Heather I Gale; Daichi Hayashi; Jeffrey N Katz; Ali Guermazi Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Hans Liebl; Gabby Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Nathan Singh; Ursula Heilmeier; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Pia M Jungmann; Charles E McCulloch; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Martin Englund; Ali Guermazi; Daniel Gale; David J Hunter; Piran Aliabadi; Margaret Clancy; David T Felson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Magdalena Posadzy; Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 5.315