OBJECTIVES: This study examined perceptions of factors that influence use and non-use of Alternative Tobacco Products (ATPs) among unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 30 homeless 18-24 year olds (80% men, 50% Hispanic, 30% Black, 17% White, 20% multi-racial/other) recruited from drop-in centers in Los Angeles. Discussion focused on several ATPs (hookah, electronic cigarettes/vaping devices, cigarillos/little cigars, smokeless tobacco, snus, natural cigarettes, clove cigarettes), soliciting participants' experiences using each ATP and motivations for using or not using each ATP. RESULTS: Focus group transcripts were subjected to a rigorous coding procedure and 8 themes relating to the reasons that participants may or may not use ATPs emerged. Each ATP was associated with distinctive characteristics that motivated use and non-use. For example, hookah use was viewed positively with positive sensory and social features dominating the discussion, whereas electronic cigarettes were viewed largely negatively (i.e., that they were expensive and harmful to health). Homelessness characterized participants' responses to the extent that cost was a factor in their choice of ATP. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide important, first look insights into factors that may influence the use and non-use of ATPs among unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined perceptions of factors that influence use and non-use of Alternative Tobacco Products (ATPs) among unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 30 homeless 18-24 year olds (80% men, 50% Hispanic, 30% Black, 17% White, 20% multi-racial/other) recruited from drop-in centers in Los Angeles. Discussion focused on several ATPs (hookah, electronic cigarettes/vaping devices, cigarillos/little cigars, smokeless tobacco, snus, natural cigarettes, clove cigarettes), soliciting participants' experiences using each ATP and motivations for using or not using each ATP. RESULTS: Focus group transcripts were subjected to a rigorous coding procedure and 8 themes relating to the reasons that participants may or may not use ATPs emerged. Each ATP was associated with distinctive characteristics that motivated use and non-use. For example, hookah use was viewed positively with positive sensory and social features dominating the discussion, whereas electronic cigarettes were viewed largely negatively (i.e., that they were expensive and harmful to health). Homelessness characterized participants' responses to the extent that cost was a factor in their choice of ATP. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide important, first look insights into factors that may influence the use and non-use of ATPs among unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness.
Authors: F Baker; S R Ainsworth; J T Dye; C Crammer; M J Thun; D Hoffmann; J L Repace; J E Henningfield; J Slade; J Pinney; T Shanks; D M Burns; G N Connolly; D R Shopland Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne L Wenzel; Joan S Tucker; Daniela Golinelli; Harold D Green; Annie Zhou Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jon D Kassel; Daniel P Evatt; Justin E Greenstein; Margaret C Wardle; Marisa C Yates; Jennifer C Veilleux Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2007-08
Authors: Koon K Teo; Stephanie Ounpuu; Steven Hawken; M R Pandey; Vicent Valentin; David Hunt; Rafael Diaz; Wafa Rashed; Rosario Freeman; Lixin Jiang; Xiaofei Zhang; Salim Yusuf Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-08-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Rachana Seelam; Daniela Golinelli; Daniel Siconolfi Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Alice Hinton; Amy Wermert; Joseph Macisco; Julianna M Nemeth Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.135