| Literature DB >> 31289586 |
Qiliang Peng1,2, Yi Shen3, Kaisu Lin4, Li Zou1,2, Yuntian Shen1,2, Yaqun Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies demonstrated that microRNA-92a (miR-92a) may serve as a novel promising biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, a comprehensive analysis of the contribution of miR-92a in CRC is lacking. We aimed to systematically summarize the diagnostic and prognostic values of miR-92a in CRC.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Colorectal cancer; Meta-analysis; System biological analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31289586 PMCID: PMC6603388 DOI: 10.7150/jca.30306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
The main features of the included studies on individual miR-92a in the diagnosis of CRC
| First author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Case | Control | Sample source | Methods | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | QUADAS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | N | Age | M | F | N | Age | ||||||||||
| Ng, EK | 2009 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 90 | 71.0 | NA | NA | 50 | 69.0 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.885 | 89% | 70% | 5 |
| Huang, ZH | 2010 | China | Asian | 51 | 49 | 100 | 61.0 | 31 | 28 | 59 | 58.0 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.838 | 84% | 71% | 3 |
| Wu, CW | 2012 | China | Asian | 49 | 39 | 88 | 67.2 | 44 | 57 | 101 | 60.5 | Feces | RT-PCR | 0.780 | 72% | 73% | 4 |
| Giraldez, MD | 2013 | Spain | Caucasian | NA | NA | 21 | 72.5 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 60.6 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.857 | 95% | 65% | 4 |
| Luo, XY | 2013 | Germany | Caucasian | 45 | 35 | 80 | 68.0 | 60 | 84 | 144 | 62.5 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.561 | 68% | 49% | 4 |
| Liu, GH | 2013 | China | Asian | 126 | 74 | 200 | 57.4 | 42 | 38 | 89 | 57.7 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.786 | 65% | 82% | 5 |
| Du, ML | 2014 | China | Asian | 30 | 19 | 49 | 61.1 | 30 | 19 | 49 | 61.7 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.533 | 18% | 96% | 4 |
| Zheng, G | 2014 | China | Asian | 93 | 67 | 160 | 60.2 | 51 | 43 | 94 | 52.3 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.871 | 80% | 80% | 3 |
| Elshafei, A | 2017 | Egypt | Africa | 46 | 18 | 64 | 51.4 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 46.4 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.844 | 84% | 81% | 4 |
| Liu, HN | 2018 | China | Asian | 51 | 34 | 85 | 59.5 | 48 | 30 | 78 | 34.8 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.817 | 79% | 72% | 5 |
| Fu, FF | 2018 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 18 | 60.0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 60.0 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.845 | 89% | 79% | 4 |
M male, F female, N number, NA not available, AUC area under the curve, QUADAS quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
The main features of the included studies on miR-92a-related combination markers in the diagnosis of CRC
| First author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Case | Control | miRNA combinations | Sample source | Methods | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | QUADAS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | N | Age | M | F | N | Age | |||||||||||
| Huang, ZH | 2010 | China | Asian | 51 | 49 | 100 | 61.0 | 31 | 28 | 59 | 58.0 | miR-92a, miR-29a | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.883 | 83% | 85% | 3 |
| Wang, QF | 2012 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 90 | NA | NA | NA | 58 | NA | miR-92a, miR-29a, miR-760 | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.943 | 83% | 93% | 5 |
| Wu, CW | 2012 | China | Asian | 49 | 39 | 88 | 67.2 | 44 | 57 | 101 | 60.5 | miR-92a, miR-21 | Feces | RT-PCR | NA | 82% | 57% | 4 |
| Liu, GH | 2013 | China | Asian | 126 | 74 | 200 | 50.0 | 42 | 38 | 80 | 57.7 | miR-92a, miR-21 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.847 | 68% | 91% | 5 |
| Luo, XY | 2013 | Germany | Caucasian | 45 | 35 | 80 | 68.0 | 60 | 84 | 144 | 62.5 | miR-92a, miR-18a, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-106b, miR-133a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-342-3p, miR-532-3p, miR-181b | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.745 | 72% | 75% | 4 |
| Wang, J | 2014 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 30 | 55.0 | NA | NA | 30 | 57.0 | miR-92a, miR-21, let-7g, miR-31, miR-181b, miR-203 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.900 | 83% | 97% | 5 |
| Wang, J | 2014 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 83 | 55.0 | NA | NA | 59 | 57.0 | miR-92a, miR-21, let-7g, miR-31, miR-181b, miR-203 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.923 | 96% | 88% | 5 |
| Zheng, G | 2014 | China | Asian | 93 | 67 | 160 | 60.2 | 51 | 43 | 94 | 52.3 | miR-92a, miR-19a, miR-223, miR-422a | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.960 | 91% | 89% | 3 |
| Zheng, G | 2014 | China | Asian | 68 | 49 | 117 | 56.3 | 59 | 43 | 102 | 52.8 | miR-92a, miR-19a, miR-223, miR-422a | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.951 | 84% | 92% | 3 |
| Chang, PY | 2016 | China | Asian | 78 | 60 | 138 | NA | 199 | 110 | 309 | NA | miR-92a, miR-223, | Feces | RT-PCR | 0.810 | 72% | 80% | 4 |
| Chang, PY | 2016 | China | Asian | 116 | 99 | 215 | NA | 115 | 68 | 183 | NA | miR-92a, miR-223, | Plasma | RT-PCR | 0.780 | 76% | 71% | 4 |
| Liu, HN | 2018 | China | Asian | 51 | 34 | 85 | 59.5 | 48 | 30 | 78 | 34.8 | miR-92a, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-125b | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.952 | 85% | 99% | 5 |
| Fu, FF | 2018 | China | Asian | NA | NA | 18 | 60.0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 60.0 | miR-92a, miR-17 | Serum | RT-PCR | 0.910 | 91% | 83% | 4 |
M male, F female, N number, NA not available, AUC area under the curve, QUADAS quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
The main features of the included studies on miR-92a in the prognosis of CRC
| First author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Male/female | N | Age | TNM stage | Sample source | Methods | Endpoints | Follow-up time (months) | Hazard ratio | Scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu, GH | 2013 | China | Asian | 126/74 | 200 | 50 | I:18; II:96; III:64; IV:22 | Serum | RT-PCR | OS | 36 | 4.36(1.64-11.57) | 7 |
| Zhou, T | 2013 | China | Asian | 57/25 | 82 | NA | I/II:34; III/IV:48 | Tissue | RT-PCR | OS | 60 | 2.95(1.49-5.81) | 9 |
| Ke, TW | 2015 | China | Asian | 64/94 | 158 | 65 | I/II:84; III/IV:74 | Tissue | RT-PCR | OS | 57.6 | 1.26(1.02-1.55) | 8 |
N number, OS overall survival
Pooled results of diagnostic accuracy of miR-92a and combination biomarkers in colorectal cancer
| Analysis | Number of studies | Se(95%CI) | Sp(95%CI) | AUC(95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Asian | 8 | 0.73 (0.57-0.85) | 0.78 (0.70-0.85) | 0.83 (0.76-0.86) | |
| Sample type | |||||
| Plasma | 5 | 0.75 (0.45-0.92) | 0.74 (0.52-0.88) | 0.80 (0.52-0.88) | |
| Serum | 5 | 0.78 (0.70-0.84) | 0.78 (0.72-0.83) | 0.83 (0.80-0.86) | |
| Circulating | 10 | 0.77 (0.63-0.87) | 0.76 (0.66-0.84) | 0.83 (0.79-0.86) | |
| Feces | 1 | 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.53 (0.43-0.63) | |
| Overall | 12 | 0.76 (0.64-0.86) | 0.75 (0.67-0.83) | 0.82 (0.79-0.85) | |
| Outliers excluded | 11 | 0.80 (0.73-0.85) | 0.73 (0.66-0.79) | 0.83 (0.79-0.86) | |
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Asian | 12 | 0.84 (0.78-0.88) | 0.88 (0.81- 0.93) | 0.92 (0.89-0.94) | |
| Sample type | |||||
| Plasma | 4 | 0.78 (0.71-0.83) | 0.81 (0.69- 0.89) | 0.85 (0.81-0.88) | |
| Serum | 7 | 0.87 (0.79-0.92) | 0.91 (0.89- 0.94) | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) | |
| Circulating | 11 | 0.84 (0.78-0.89) | 0.89 (0.84- 0.93) | 0.93 (0.90-0.95) | |
| miRNA number | |||||
| 2 | 6 | 0.77 (0.71-0.82) | 0.78 (0.67- 0.86) | 0.82 (0.79-0.85) | |
| >2 | 7 | 0.86 (0.80-0.91) | 0.92 (0.86- 0.95) | 0.95 (0.93-0.97) | |
| Overall | 13 | 0.83 (0.78-0.87) | 0.87 (0.80- 0.92) | 0.91 (0.88-0.93) | |
| Outliers excluded | 12 | 0.81 (0.76-0.85) | 0.87 (0.79- 0.92) | 0.89 (0.86-0.91) |
Note: AUC, area under the curve; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval