| Literature DB >> 31289330 |
Daguo Mi1, Ying Yuan2,3, Yanping Zhang2,4, Jiahui Niu2, Yaxian Wang2, Junying Yan5, Yumin Yang2, Wen Hu6,7.
Abstract
Tract tracing with neuronal tracers not only represents a straightforward approach to identify axonal projection connection between regions of the nervous system at distance but also provides compelling evidence for axonal regeneration. An ideal neuronal tracer meets certain criteria including high labeling efficacy, minimal neurotoxicity, rapid labeling, suitable stability in vivo, and compatibility to tissue processing for histological/immunohistochemical staining. Although labeling efficacy of commonly used fluorescent tracers has been studied extensively, neurotoxicity and their effect on neural functions remains poorly understood. In the present study, we comprehensively evaluated motor and sensory nerve function 2-24 weeks after injection of retrograde tracer Fluoro-Gold (FG), True Blue (TB) or Fluoro-Ruby (FR) in the tibial nerve in adult Spague-Dawley rats. We found that motor and sensory nerve functions were completely recovered by 24 weeks after tracer exposure, and that FG lead to a more prolonged delay in functional recovery than TB. These findings shed light on the long-term effect of tracers on nerve function and peripheral axonal regeneration, and therefore have implications in selection of appropriate tracers in relevant studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31289330 PMCID: PMC6616333 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46285-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Motor and sensory deficits resulted from fluorescent tracers are reversible but FG impedes functional recovery for a more prolonged period than TB. (A) Walking track analysis showing tibial function index over time. (B) Score of pinch response in the fifth toe. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 12 rats/group unless otherwise specified) and analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons for data of all time points excluding 24 weeks after injection where data of only 6 animals per group were available. ⌘P < 0.001 compared to FR, ❖P < 0.001 compared to TB.
Figure 2Injection of FG in the tibial nerve leads to a significant delay in recovery of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in the gastrocnemius muscle. (A) Representative CMAP traces for each group and the contralateral naive side at 12 weeks after injection. The scale bars represent 20 mV and 5 ms, respectively. (B) Bar chart showing peak CMAP amplitude relative to corresponding naive side. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 rats each) and analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons. ***P < 0.001 compared to FR, #P < 0.05 compared to TB at the same survival time.
Figure 3FG injected in the tibial nerve results in more prolonged atrophy of the gastrocnemius muscle than TB. Bar charts show wet weight ratio of the muscles indicated, which was calculated by dividing the muscle weight of the injected side with that of the corresponding contralateral normal side. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 6 rats each) and analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons. ***P < 0.001 compared to FR, ###P < 0.001 compared to TB at the same survival time. Δ indicates overall statistical significance (P < 0.05) for the group factor; however, no statistical significance was reached in post hoc comparisons.
Figure 4The tibial nerve distal to injection site exhibits an equal number of remyelinated axons to naive control nerve 24 weeks after injection of FG, TB or FR. (A) Representative photomicrographs showing semi-thin transverse nerve sections stained with toluidine blue. Bar = 20 µm. (B) Counts of myelinated nerve fibers in the tibial nerve. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 6 rats each) and analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons. No statistical significance was reached between groups.
Figure 5Retrograde labeling of somata of spinal motor neurons 12 and 24 weeks after injection of FG, TB or FR into the tibial nerve. (A) Representative confocal images of horizontal (longitudinal) section of the lumbar spinal cord showing labeling of tibial motor neuron pool. Arrows indicate somatic profiles of motor neurons in which fluorescence is markedly dimmer than TB. No fluorescence labeling of motor neurons was detectable 24 weeks after injection of FR or FG. Bar = 300 µm. (B) Counts of labeled tibial motor neurons. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 6 rats each) and analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons. There is no statistical significance in the number of TB-labeled motor neurons 12 w as compared to 24 w after tracer injection.