| Literature DB >> 31289261 |
Kazumi Ozaki1,2,3,4, Katharine J Thompson5, Rachel L Simister5, Sean A Crowe1,5, Christopher T Reinhard6,7.
Abstract
The emergence ofEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31289261 PMCID: PMC6616575 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10872-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Physiological data for Chlorobium phaeoferrooxidans str. KB01. a Time-series data for dissolved phosphate (○), dissolved ferrous iron (●), and pigment concentrations (+) in batch culture. b Time-series data for the partitioning of phosphorus between dissolved (diss), Fe-oxide-bound phosphorus (oxides), and phosphorus in photosynthetic biomass (biomass)
Fig. 2Phosphorus gene positions in the genome of Chlorobium phaeoferrooxidans strain KB01. Highlighted are the positions of genes involved in high-affinity inorganic phosphorus (Pi) uptake (white), including components of the pho regulon, alkaline phosphatase (PhoA), and polyphosphate kinase (ppk). Also shown are positions of transcriptional regulator and transposase proteins (tr), membrane, envelope, and transporter proteins (met), hydrolases (hy), oxidoreductases (ox), ABC transporter proteins (abc), and other proteins (black) in each open-reading frame (ORF). kb kilobase
Fig. 3Comparative molecular phylogeny of 16S rRNA and major genes regulating P metabolism. Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees (FastTree) of concatenated 16S rRNA gene (a), PstABC (b), and PhoU (c). Nodes are annotated with Neighbor Joining (1000x bootstrapped) and FastTree support values. These phylogenies are equivalent to previously established and accepted phylogenies for the Chlorobiales based on the 16S and FMO genes. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony yielded trees with similar topology (trees not shown). Clade nomenclature follows recommended taxonomy: Group 1 = Prostheochloris, Group 2 = Chlorobium 2, Group 3 = Chlorobium 3, Group 4 = Chlorobaculum. The outgroup is Rhodothermus marinus DSM 4252. Circles at the branch tips represent photoferrotrophic organisms and the (○) denotes Chlorobium phaeoferrooxidans strain KB01. Note that C. thalassium lacks a PhoU gene
Fig. 4Representative results from our 1-D competitive photosynthesis model. a Water column and Fe2+ concentrations; and b rates of oxygenic and anoxygenic (photoferrotrophic) photosynthesis for our baseline simulation. c Relative contribution of oxygenic photosynthesis to total water column photosynthesis (foxy) as a function of deep water dissolved Fe/P ratio. The open circle denotes our baseline simulation. Note the log scale in c
Fig. 5Sensitivity analysis of the 1-D competitive photosynthesis model. Shown in a is the response of our principle diagnostic parameter, the fraction of overall photosynthesis performed by oxygenic phototrophs (foxy), to varying each metabolic and physical parameter of the model by an order of magnitude above and below the value in the default parameter set (shown by the black horizontal line and denoted by the open circle in Fig. 4). Major metabolic parameters are maximum growth rates (µ) and half-saturation constants for light (I) and nutrients (K) for oxygenic phototrophs and photoferrotrophs (subscripts c and p, respectively). Physical parameters include light attenuation constant (λ), distribution coefficient for scavenging/coprecipitation of phosphorus on iron oxides (Kd), eddy diffusivity (K), and upwelling rate (w). Shown in b–e are sensitivity ensembles for physical parameters, with relative oxygenic phototrophy plotted as a function of relative forcing of each parameter
Fig. 6Representative results from our global ocean-sediment biogeochemical model (CANOPS-KB). a Each curve shows net oxygen fluxes (Φox) as a function of atmospheric pO2. Intersection points at Φox = 0 indicate regions of parameter space in which the O2 cycle is at equilibrium and dominated by negative feedback (negative slope) and positive feedback (positive slope). Circles plotted along the black curve thus show examples of stable (open) and unstable (closed) equilibrium points for model runs at a nominal deep ocean Fe/P ratio of 100. Each curve is labeled by an assumed external reductant flux (i.e., volcanic/metamorphic reductant input minus O2 accumulation due to hydrogen escape and/or imbalances in global S and Fe cycling, Φred) in Tmol O2 equivalents year−1. b Each curve plots stable equilibrium pO2 values as a function of deep ocean Fe/P ratio ([Fe/P]d) under the same conditions as shown in a. The (○) shows our nominal model ([Fe/P]d = 100 and no external reductant input). Arrows above and below the curves denote regions where our model predicts runaway oxygenation or deoxygenation, respectively. Also shown in b are approximate estimates of [Fe/P]d for the Archean and Proterozoic (shaded gray bars; see text)