Literature DB >> 31289028

Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy Use among the Average-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Trend Analysis.

Rafael Cardoso1,2, Tobias Niedermaier3, Chen Chen2,3, Michael Hoffmeister3, Hermann Brenner4,3,5.   

Abstract

Monitoring population-level colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy use is crucial to estimate the future burden of colorectal cancer and guide screening efforts. We conducted a systematic literature search on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy use, published between November 2016 and December 2018 in the databases PubMed and Web of Science to update previous reviews and analyze time trends for various countries. In addition, we used data from the German and European Health Interview Surveys and the National Health Interview Survey to explore recent time trends for Germany and the US, respectively. The literature search yielded 23 new articles: fourteen from the US and nine from Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and South Korea. Colonoscopy use within 10 years was highest and, apart from the youngest age groups eligible for colorectal cancer screening, kept increasing to levels close to 60% in the US and Germany. A recent steep increase was also observed for South Korea. Limited data were available on sigmoidoscopy use; regional studies from the US suggest that sigmoidoscopy has become rarely used. Despite high uptake and ongoing increase in the US, Germany, and South Korea, use of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy has either remained low or essentially unknown for the majority of countries. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31289028     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  7 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Risk by Genetic Variants in Populations With and Without Colonoscopy History.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Xuechen Chen; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-01-23

Review 2.  Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Oliver Bendall; Joel James; Katarzyna M Pawlak; Sauid Ishaq; J Andy Tau; Noriko Suzuki; Steven Bollipo; Keith Siau
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-24

3.  Automated histological classification for digital pathology images of colonoscopy specimen via deep learning.

Authors:  Sun-Ju Byeon; Jungkap Park; Yoon Ah Cho; Bum-Joo Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Impact of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020 guidelines on the number of scheduled post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopies: Meeting presentations: Partial results of this research were published in abstract form at ESGE Days 2020.

Authors:  Marco Bustamante-Balén; Maria García-Campos; Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga; Noelia Alonso-Lázaro; Cristina Sanchez-Montes; Lidia Argüello-Viudez; Vicente Pons-Beltrán
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Impact of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias on colorectal cancer screening utilization, knowledge, and associated health disparities.

Authors:  Gang Lv; Xiaoxia Wang; Xiangxiang Jiang; Minghui Li; Kevin Lu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.988

6.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Temporary In Situ Hydrogel Dressings for Colon Polypectomies.

Authors:  Katherine Cook; Nada Naguib; Courtney E Price; Stefan Katharios; Jack Kirsch; Kareen Cortes; Katherine Hohl; George A O'Toole; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-08-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.