Literature DB >> 31288906

Lung Bioposy Without Pleural Drainage.

Thomas Lesser1, Torsten Doenst, Thomas Lehmann, Jerar Mukdessi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopy and atypical resection of lung parenchyma is a surgical procedure that is carried out very commonly around the world, mainly to determine the degree of malignancy of a suspect pulmonary nodule. A pleural drain is routinely inserted at the end of the procedure. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of this procedure with and without pleural drainage.
METHODS: From June 2015 to January 2018, 74 patients were prospectively randomized to either the chest-tube group (CT group, 37 patients) or the no-chest-tube group (NCT group, 37 patients) and were followed up until the seventh day after surgery. The postoperative duration of hospital stay was the primary endpoint; the secondary endpoints were the rates of pneumothorax and repeated chest drainage, pain intensity, and analgesic consumption. Blinding was not possible. An intention- to-treat analysis was performed. (Study registration; DRKS00008194, www.drks.de/drks.).
RESULTS: Hospital stays were significantly shorter in the NCT group (means and first and fourth quartiles: 1.5 [1.5; 1.5] versus 2.5 [2.5, 2.5] days, p<0.001). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the frequency of postoperative complications. There were two occurrences of postoperative pneumothorax in the NCT group, with one patient needing drainage via chest tube and the other needing no treatment. Pain intensity and analgesic consumption were markedly lower in the NCT group; the cumulative oral intake of metamizole and acetaminophen was also lower in the NCT group (mean ± standard deviation: 3.7 ± 2.2 g in the NCT group versus 10.0 ± 4.2 g in the CT group, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Not inserting a chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy significantly shortens the postoperative hospital stay, and the complications in the chest-tube and no-chest-tube groups are similar. Postoperative pain and analgesic consumption are markedly less when no chest tube is inserted.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31288906      PMCID: PMC6630165          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  17 in total

Review 1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung: analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications over 15 years and review of the literature.

Authors:  L Solaini; F Prusciano; P Bagioni; F di Francesco; L Solaini; D B Poddie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Peri-operative complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Authors:  Andrea Imperatori; Nicola Rotolo; Matteo Gatti; Elisa Nardecchia; Lavinia De Monte; Valentina Conti; Lorenzo Dominioni
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Multimodal analgesic treatment in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy using an intraoperative intercostal catheter.

Authors:  Kim Wildgaard; Rene H Petersen; Henrik J Hansen; Hasse Møller-Sørensen; Thomas K Ringsted; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  [Pulmonary nodule. The surgeon's approach].

Authors:  H Hoffmann; H Dienemann
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.942

5.  Feasibility and safety of postoperative management without chest tube placement after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.

Authors:  Shinji Nakashima; Atsushi Watanabe; Taijirou Mishina; Takuro Obama; Tohru Mawatari; Tetsuya Higami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  [Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Results of a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  W Sienel; J Mueller; S Eggeling; O Thetter; B Passlick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Avoiding chest tube placement after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.

Authors:  Atsushi Watanabe; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisayoshi Ohsawa; Tohru Mawatari; Yasunori Ichimiya; Noriyuki Takahashi; Hiroki Sato; Tomio Abe
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Thoracic ultrasound can predict safe removal of thoracostomy tubes.

Authors:  Michael C Soult; Jay N Collins; Timothy J Novosel; Leonard J Weireter; L D Britt
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Routine placement of an intercostal chest drain during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lung biopsy unnecessarily prolongs in-hospital length of stay in selected patients.

Authors:  Lucy K Satherley; Heyman Luckraz; Kandadai S Rammohan; Mabel Phillips; Nihal E P Kulatilake; Peter A O'Keefe
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Is an intercostal chest drain necessary after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung biopsy?

Authors:  Heyman Luckraz; Kandadai S Rammohan; Mabel Phillips; Rob Abel; Siva Karthikeyan; Nihal E P Kulatilake; Peter A O'Keefe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  CT-Guided Rather Than Thoracoscopic.

Authors:  Gernot Rott
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  In Reply.

Authors:  Thomas Lesser
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Efficacy and safety of omitting chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Huang; Henrik Kehlet; Bo Laksáfoss Holbek; Tina Kold Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  To use indwelling drainage or not in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients: A comparative study.

Authors:  Yiding Xiao; Jianqiang Hu; Mingzi Zhang; Wenchao Zhang; Feng Qin; Ang Zeng; Xiaojun Wang; Zhifei Liu; Lin Zhu; Nanze Yu; Loubin Si; Fei Long; Yu Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.