| Literature DB >> 31288734 |
Hanife Usta Atmaca1, Feray Akbas2, Hale Aral3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microparticles are procoagulant membrane vesicles that play role in endothelium dysfunction pathogenesis and are increased in hypertension, acute/chronic vascular pathological events. Here; we aimed to compare MPs levels of hypertensive geriatric patients with healthy age-match-patients, discuss its availability as a cardiovascular biomarker and investigate its relationship with other inflammatory markers.Entities:
Keywords: Endothelial dysfunction; Hypertension in the elderly; Microparticles; Procoagulant activity; Thrombin generation test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31288734 PMCID: PMC6617697 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1148-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1‘Thrombogram curve’ sample from CAT (Calibrated Automated Thrombography device, Diagnostica Stago, France)
Comparison of the demographic and laboratory data in control and patient groups
| Control group | Patient group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71.6 ± 9.1 | 72.7 ± 7.2 | = 0.5160 |
| Gender (M/F) | 19/28 | 15/32 | = 0.3910 |
| ALT (U/L) | 18 (14–22) | 16 (13–21) | = 0.3040 |
| GGT (U/L) | 20 (15–35) | 19 (15–32) | = 0.6270 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.09 (1.83–7.76) | 5.20 (2.39–10.80) | = 0.3100 |
| WBC (×10^9/L) | 7.2 ± 2.0 | 7.4 ± 2.0 | = 0.6120 |
| Neutrophyl (×10^9/L) | 4.3 ± 1.8 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | = 0.5880 |
| Lymphocyte (×10^9/L) | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | = 0.9360 |
| NLR | 2.07 (1.34–2.81) | 2.13 (1.41–3.09) | = 0.5010 |
| PLT (×10^9/L) | 216.9 ± 57.4 | 247.2 ± 64.7 |
|
| PDW (fL) | 11.5 (11.0–13.3) | 11.7 (10.9–13.3) | = 0.8050 |
| MPV (fL) | 10.5 ± 0.9 | 10.3 ± 0.8 | = 0.4810 |
| PCT (%) | 0.23 (0.21–0.25) | 0.26 (0.20–0.28) | = 0.1650 |
| MPslag time (min) | 12.87 (10.33–15.67) | 12.00 (10.67–14.00) | = 0.5960 |
| MPs ETP (nmol/L•min) | 2092.8 ± 676.1 | 2029.5 ± 615.9 | = 0.6450 |
| MPsPeak (nmol/L) | 377.43 (294.73–463.98) | 388.27 (315.29–473.32) | = 0.5040 |
| MPsttPeak (min) | 15.67 (13.00–19.21) | 14.44 (13.00–16.38) | = 0.2700 |
| MPsstartTail (min) | 31 (28–35) | 30 (27–33) | = 0.2730 |
Meaningful difference was found for only PLT between patient and control groups
Meaningful correlations found between TGT parameters of MPslag time, ETP, Peak, ttPeak, startTail parameters and other demographic/laboratory data
| Variables | Whole group | Control group | Patient group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPs lag time | Age | rs = − 0.217 | rs = − 0.273 | |
| Lymphocyte | r = − 0.377 | |||
| MPs ETP | CRP | rs = 0.393 | rs = 0.472 | |
| PDW | rs = − 0.273 | rs = − 0.401 | ||
| MPV | rs = − 0.271 | r = − 0.364 | ||
| PCT | r = − 0.374 p = 0.029 | |||
| MPs Peak | CRP | rs = 0.308 | rs = 0.332 | |
| PLT | rs = 0.324 | |||
| PDW | rs = − 0.233 | rs = − 0.445 | ||
| MPV | rs = − 0.272 | rs = − 0.478 | ||
| MPs ttPeak | Age | rs = − 0.230 | ||
| MPs startTail | Age | rs = −0.261 | rs = − 0.350 | |
| CRP | rs = 0.238 | rs = 0.314 | ||
r Pearson correlation coefficient
r Spearman correlation coefficient
Fig. 2Histograms of theMPs ETP (nmol/L•dk) in the control (a) and the patient (b) groups. SkewnessControl Group = 1.067 SkewnessPatientGroup = 0.819. KurtosisControl Group = 1.775 KurtosisPatientGroup = 0.628