Literature DB >> 31288672

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban and Risks of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Wen-Han Cheng1,2, Tze-Fan Chao1,2, Yenn-Jiang Lin1,2, Shih-Lin Chang1,2, Li-Wei Lo1,2, Yu-Feng Hu1,2, Ta-Chuan Tuan1,2, Jo-Nan Liao1,2, Fa-Po Chung1,2, Gregory Y H Lip3, Shih-Ann Chen1,2.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- In the daily practice, low-dose nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are commonly used among Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to compare the risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and net clinical benefit of Asian patients with AF treated with off-label low-dose and on-label dosing rivaroxaban. Methods- A total of 2214 patients with AF aged ≥20 years treated with rivaroxaban at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan were studied. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: (1) on-label dose (n=1630): ROCKET-AF or J-ROCKET dosage criteria; and (2) off-label low-dose (10 mg/d for patients with an estimated glomerulus filtration rate >50 mL/min, n=584). The risks of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were compared between 2 groups. Results- Compared with the on-label dose group, off-label low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.75; 95% CI =1.62-4.69; P<0.001). The risk intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the on-label and off-label low-dosing groups (adjusted hazard ratio =0.62; 95% CI =0.32-1.20; P=0.213). Compared with off-label low-dose group, on-label dosing rivaroxaban was associated with a positive net clinical benefit in different weighted models. The results were consistent among the propensity-matched cohort. Conclusions- Off-label low-dosing rivaroxaban should be avoided for Asian patients with AF giving the higher risk of ischemic stroke without risk reduction in intracranial hemorrhage compared with on-label dosing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; intracranial hemorrhage; risk; rivaroxaban

Year:  2019        PMID: 31288672     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  11 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of appropriately and inappropriately dosed rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cohort study with nested case-control analyses from UK primary care.

Authors:  Antonio González-Pérez; Luke Roberts; Pareen Vora; Maria Eugenia Saez; Gunnar Brobert; Samuel Fatoba; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Stroke prevention strategies in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kotalczyk; Michał Mazurek; Zbigniew Kalarus; Tatjana S Potpara; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Rationale and design of a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of appropriateness evaluation of the prescription of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for Chinese atrial fibrillation patients (Chi-NOACs-AF trial).

Authors:  Zheng Ding; Chi Zhang; Yi-Yi Qian; Na Wang; Zhi-Chun Gu; Hang Xu; Ying-Li Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 4.  Effect of non-recommended doses versus recommended doses of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuyang Liu; Manxiang Huang; Caisheng Ye; Xiujuan Xiao; Chengguang Yan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Effectiveness and Safety of Under or Over-dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 148909 Patients From 10 Real-World Studies.

Authors:  Nan-Nan Shen; Chi Zhang; Na Wang; Jia-Liang Wang; Zhi-Chun Gu; Hua Han
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  2021 Focused Update Consensus Guidelines of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary.

Authors:  Tze-Fan Chao; Boyoung Joung; Yoshihide Takahashi; Toon Wei Lim; Eue-Keun Choi; Yi-Hsin Chan; Yutao Guo; Charn Sriratanasathavorn; Seil Oh; Ken Okumura; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  A retrospective study on the evaluation of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yiyi Qian; Jiajun Zhang; Jiangya Li; Zhiying Weng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effectiveness and Safety of Reduced and Standard Daily Doses of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study Using National Database Representing the Japanese Population.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kubota; Nobuhiro Ooba
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.814

9.  Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ze Li; Yingming Zheng; Dandan Li; Xiaozhen Wang; Sheng Cheng; Xiao Luo; Aiping Wen
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Efficacy and Safety of Clinically Driven Low-Dose Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asians with Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillie Choi; Jae Eun No; Ju-Yeun Lee; Soo An Choi; Woo-Young Chung; Young-Mi Ah; Yun Mi Yu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.