Literature DB >> 31288630

Brain activity and connectivity changes in response to nutritive natural sugars, non-nutritive natural sugar replacements and artificial sweeteners.

Anna M Van Opstal1, Anne Hafkemeijer1,2,3, Annette A van den Berg-Huysmans1, Marco Hoeksma4, Theo P J Mulder4, Hanno Pijl5, Serge A R B Rombouts1,2,3, Jeroen van der Grond1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The brain plays an important regulatory role in directing energy homeostasis and eating behavior. The increased ingestion of sugars and sweeteners over the last decades makes investigating the effects of these substances on the regulatory function of the brain of particular interest. We investigated whole brain functional response to the ingestion of nutrient shakes sweetened with either the nutritive natural sugars glucose and fructose, the low- nutritive natural sugar replacement allulose or the non-nutritive artificial sweetener sucralose.
METHODS: Twenty healthy, normal weight, adult males underwent functional MRI on four separate visits. In a double-blind randomized study setup, participants received shakes sweetened with glucose, fructose, allulose or sucralose. Resting state functional MRI was performed before and after ingestion. Changes in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal, functional network connectivity and voxel based connectivity by Eigenvector Centrality Mapping (ECM) were measured.
RESULTS: Glucose and fructose led to significant decreased BOLD signal in the cingulate cortex, insula and the basal ganglia. Glucose led to a significant increase in eigen vector centrality throughout the brain and a significant decrease in eigen vector centrality in the midbrain. Sucralose and allulose had no effect on BOLD signal or network connectivity but sucralose did lead to a significant increase in eigen vector centrality values in the cingulate cortex, central gyri and temporal lobe. DISCUSSION: Taken together our findings show that even in a shake containing fat and protein, the type of sweetener can affect brain responses and might thus affect reward and satiety responses and feeding behavior. The sweet taste without the corresponding energy content of the non-nutritive sweeteners appeared to have only small effects on the brain. Indicating that the while ingestion of nutritive sugars could have a strong effect on feeding behavior, both in a satiety aspect as well as rewarding aspects, non-nutritive sweeteners appear to not have these effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT02745730.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; artificial sweeteners; brain activity; eigen vector centrality; energy ingestion; functional network connectivity; non-nutritive sweeteners; nutritive sweeteners

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31288630     DOI: 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1639306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Neurosci        ISSN: 1028-415X            Impact factor:   4.994


  11 in total

1.  Nine 'brain food' tips for researchers.

Authors:  Jaouad Bouayed; Torsten Bohn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.

Authors:  Michael C Farruggia; Robert Pellegrino; Dustin Scheinost
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 3.  Dissecting ultra-processed foods and drinks: Do they have a potential to impact the brain?

Authors:  Oren Contreras-Rodriguez; Montserrat Solanas; Rosa M Escorihuela
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  D-allulose ameliorates adiposity through the AMPK-SIRT1-PGC-1α pathway in HFD-induced SD rats.

Authors:  Geum-Hwa Lee; Cheng Peng; Hwa-Young Lee; Seon-Ah Park; The-Hiep Hoang; Jung Hyun Kim; Soonok Sa; Go-Eun Kim; Jung-Sook Han; Han-Jung Chae
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Carbohydrate Mouth-Rinsing Improves Overtime Physical Performance in Male Ice Hockey Players During On-Ice Scrimmages.

Authors:  Danielle L E Nyman; Alexander S D Gamble; Jessica L Bigg; Logan A Boyd; Alexander J Vanderheyden; Lawrence L Spriet
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 6.  A High-Sugar Diet Consumption, Metabolism and Health Impacts with a Focus on the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Kacper Witek; Karolina Wydra; Małgorzata Filip
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.706

7.  Metabolic Stability of D-Allulose in Biorelevant Media and Hepatocytes: Comparison with Fructose and Erythritol.

Authors:  Han-Joo Maeng; Jin-Ha Yoon; Kwang-Hoon Chun; Sung Tae Kim; Dong-Jin Jang; Ji-Eun Park; Yang Hee Kim; Seong-Bo Kim; Yu Chul Kim
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  How Does Our Brain Process Sugars and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Differently: A Systematic Review on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Natalie Sui Miu Wong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Alexandra G Yunker; Jasmin M Alves; Shan Luo; Brendan Angelo; Alexis DeFendis; Trevor A Pickering; John R Monterosso; Kathleen A Page
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

10.  Rare sugars: metabolic impacts and mechanisms of action: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alison Smith; Amanda Avery; Rebecca Ford; Qian Yang; Aurélie Goux; Indraneil Mukherjee; David C A Neville; Preeti Jethwa
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.