María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada1, Boris Lucero2, Asa Bradman3, Kyle Steenland4, Liliana Zúñiga2, Antonia M Calafat5, María Ospina5, Verónica Iglesias6, María Pía Muñoz6, Rafael J Buralli7, Claudio Fredes8, Juan Pablo Gutiérrez9. 1. The Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile. Electronic address: mtmunoz@ucm.cl. 2. The Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile. 3. Center for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 6. School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. 7. Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 8. Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile. 9. Doctorate in Applied Mathematical Modeling, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organophosphate (OP) pesticides can be hazardous to human health if not applied with appropriate precautions. There is evidence in the Maule region of Chile that rural schoolchildren are exposed to OP pesticides. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention on OP exposure and understanding of pesticides and their hazards (risk perception) in two school communities in the Maule Region of Chile during 2016. METHOD: We conducted a quasi-experimental study about the effects on OP pesticide exposure of a community outreach and education program (COEP) administered in four 2-h sessions that's included hands-on activities among 48 schoolchildren from two rural schools. The intervention was directed to groups of parents and school-children separately, and aimed to educate them about the risks of exposure to pesticides and their effects on health. We measured 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy), 2-isopropyl-4-methyl-6-hydroxypyrimidine (IMPY), malathion dicarboxylic acid (MDA), p-nitrophenol (PNP), specific urinary metabolites of the OP pesticides chlorpyrifos, diazinon, malathion and parathion, respectively, as well as the non-specific diethylakylphosphates (DEAPs) and dimethylalkylphosphates (DMAPs) in 192 urine samples of schoolchildren collected before and after the intervention. The risk perception of school children and their parents was also assessed through a questionnaire before and after the intervention. Generalized Estimated Equations were used to account for each child's repeated measures during four sessions, two in September 2016 (pre-intervention) and two in November 2016 (post-intervention). RESULTS: The intervention level had significant effect on the risk perception of adults and children, which increased after the intervention. However, the intervention was not associated with reduced of urinary metabolites levels, with no significant differences between the pre and post measures. The detection frequencies were 1.1% (MDA), 71.4% (TCPy), 43.3% (IMPY), 98.96% (PNP), and 100% (DEAPs and DMAPs). Higher DEAPs urine concentrations were associated with eating more fruit at school (p = 0.03), a younger age (p = 0.03), and being male (p = 0.01). DMAPs showed no associations with potential predictor variables (e.g. OPs applied at home, fruit consumption at school, among others). Higher TCPy was associated with attending a school closer to farms (p = 0.04) and living in a home closer to farm fields (p = 0.01); higher PNP was marginally associated with children younger age (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Environmental exposure to OP pesticides was unchanged even after behavior changes. It is possible that a longer time period is needed to observe changes in both behavior and urinary metabolites. The levels of DEP and DMP metabolites found here are above the reference population of the US, and our findings indicate exposure to a wide variety of OP pesticides. Given that individual-level interventions were not associated with lower exposures, efforts to reduce exposure must occur upstream and require stricter regulation and control of pesticide use by government agencies.
BACKGROUND:Organophosphate (OP) pesticides can be hazardous to human health if not applied with appropriate precautions. There is evidence in the Maule region of Chile that rural schoolchildren are exposed to OP pesticides. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention on OP exposure and understanding of pesticides and their hazards (risk perception) in two school communities in the Maule Region of Chile during 2016. METHOD: We conducted a quasi-experimental study about the effects on OP pesticide exposure of a community outreach and education program (COEP) administered in four 2-h sessions that's included hands-on activities among 48 schoolchildren from two rural schools. The intervention was directed to groups of parents and school-children separately, and aimed to educate them about the risks of exposure to pesticides and their effects on health. We measured 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy), 2-isopropyl-4-methyl-6-hydroxypyrimidine (IMPY), malathion dicarboxylic acid (MDA), p-nitrophenol (PNP), specific urinary metabolites of the OP pesticides chlorpyrifos, diazinon, malathion and parathion, respectively, as well as the non-specific diethylakylphosphates (DEAPs) and dimethylalkylphosphates (DMAPs) in 192 urine samples of schoolchildren collected before and after the intervention. The risk perception of school children and their parents was also assessed through a questionnaire before and after the intervention. Generalized Estimated Equations were used to account for each child's repeated measures during four sessions, two in September 2016 (pre-intervention) and two in November 2016 (post-intervention). RESULTS: The intervention level had significant effect on the risk perception of adults and children, which increased after the intervention. However, the intervention was not associated with reduced of urinary metabolites levels, with no significant differences between the pre and post measures. The detection frequencies were 1.1% (MDA), 71.4% (TCPy), 43.3% (IMPY), 98.96% (PNP), and 100% (DEAPs and DMAPs). Higher DEAPs urine concentrations were associated with eating more fruit at school (p = 0.03), a younger age (p = 0.03), and being male (p = 0.01). DMAPs showed no associations with potential predictor variables (e.g. OPs applied at home, fruit consumption at school, among others). Higher TCPy was associated with attending a school closer to farms (p = 0.04) and living in a home closer to farm fields (p = 0.01); higher PNP was marginally associated with children younger age (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Environmental exposure to OP pesticides was unchanged even after behavior changes. It is possible that a longer time period is needed to observe changes in both behavior and urinary metabolites. The levels of DEP and DMP metabolites found here are above the reference population of the US, and our findings indicate exposure to a wide variety of OP pesticides. Given that individual-level interventions were not associated with lower exposures, efforts to reduce exposure must occur upstream and require stricter regulation and control of pesticide use by government agencies.
Authors: Alicia L Salvatore; Jonathan Chevrier; Asa Bradman; José Camacho; Jesús López; Geri Kavanagh-Baird; Meredith Minkler; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Boris Lucero; Verónica Iglesias; María Pía Muñoz; Eduardo Achú; Claudia Cornejo; Carlos Concha; Angela Grillo; Ana María Brito Journal: Gac Sanit Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 2.139
Authors: María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Verónica Iglesias; Boris Lucero; Kyle Steenland; Dana Boyd Barr; Karen Levy; P Barry Ryan; Sergio Alvarado; Carlos Concha Journal: Environ Int Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Boris Lucero; Verónica Iglesias; Karen Levy; María Pía Muñoz; Eduardo Achú; Claudia Cornejo; Carlos Concha; Ana María Brito; Marcos Villalobos Journal: Int J Environ Health Res Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Amy R Marks; Kim Harley; Asa Bradman; Katherine Kogut; Dana Boyd Barr; Caroline Johnson; Norma Calderon; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Joan Rothlein; Diane Rohlman; Michael Lasarev; Jackie Phillips; Juan Muniz; Linda McCauley Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Dana B Barr; Roberto Bravo; Gayanga Weerasekera; Lisa M Caltabiano; Ralph D Whitehead; Anders O Olsson; Samuel P Caudill; Susan E Schober; James L Pirkle; Eric J Sampson; Richard J Jackson; Larry L Needham Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Brenda Eskenazi; Amy R Marks; Asa Bradman; Kim Harley; Dana B Barr; Caroline Johnson; Norma Morga; Nicholas P Jewell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ana E Skomal; Jasen Zhang; Kun Yang; Jessica Yen; Xin Tu; Jose Suarez-Torres; Dolores Lopez-Paredes; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; Danilo Martinez; Jose R Suarez-Lopez Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Juan Pablo Gutiérrez-Jara; Fernando Córdova-Lepe; María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Gerardo Chowell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240