Literature DB >> 31288095

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease and High-Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Nico Gagelmann1, Diderik-Jan Eikema2, Linda Koster3, Denis Caillot4, Pietro Pioltelli5, Juan Bargay Lleonart6, Péter Reményi7, Didier Blaise8, Nicolaas Schaap9, Marek Trneny10, Jakob Passweg11, Rocio Parody Porras12, Jean Yves Cahn13, Maurizio Musso14, Xavier Poiré15, Roland Fenk16, Maija Itälä-Remes17, Vincenzo Pavone18, Loic Fouillard19, Johan Maertens20, Dominique Bron21, Anastasia Pouli22, Wilfried Schroyens23, Stefan Schönland24, Laurent Garderet25, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha26, Nicolaus Kröger27.   

Abstract

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant combined with novel agents continues to be the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and high-risk cytogenetics is not yet defined. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with EMD undergoing single autologous (n = 373), tandem autologous (n = 84), or autologous-allogeneic transplant (n = 31) between 2003 and 2015. At least 1 high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n = 202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) the most frequent. More than 1 high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 54% and 29%, respectively, versus 78% and 49% for standard-risk cytogenetics (P < .001). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, OS and PFS were 70% and 43% for single autologous versus 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (P = .06 and P = .30). In multivariate analysis high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = .003), whereas tandem autologous significantly improved outcome versus single autologous transplant (HRs, .46 and .64; P = .02 and P = .03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival, but results were limited because of small population (HR, .31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with EMD and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous, whereas a tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic; Autologous; Cytogenetics; Extramedullary disease; Myeloma; Tandem

Year:  2019        PMID: 31288095     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical characteristics, treatment efficacy and survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with single- versus multi-site extramedullary invasion.

Authors:  Yongfeng Zhao; Fuling Zhou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Multiple Myeloma With Myelomatous Pleural Effusion: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Junhui Xu; Weiwei Xie; Bingjie Wang; Xinan Cen; Mangju Wang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

3.  Indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2022.

Authors:  John A Snowden; Isabel Sánchez-Ortega; Selim Corbacioglu; Grzegorz W Basak; Christian Chabannon; Rafael de la Camara; Harry Dolstra; Rafael F Duarte; Bertram Glass; Raffaella Greco; Arjan C Lankester; Mohamad Mohty; Bénédicte Neven; Régis Peffault de Latour; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Zinaida Peric; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Anna Sureda; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.174

4.  Blood-based risk stratification for pre-malignant and symptomatic plasma cell neoplasms to improve patient management.

Authors:  María A Vasco-Mogorrón; José A Campillo; Adela Periago; Valentin Cabañas; Mercedes Berenguer; María C García-Garay; Lourdes Gimeno; María F Soto-Ramírez; María D Martínez-Hernández; Manuel Muro; Alfredo Minguela
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis of Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Guang Li; Yan-Ping Song; Yao Lv; Zhen-Zhen Li; Yan-Hua Zheng
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Proliferation to Apoptosis Tumor Cell Ratio as a Biomarker to Improve Clinical Management of Pre-Malignant and Symptomatic Plasma Cell Neoplasms.

Authors:  María A Vasco-Mogorrón; José A Campillo; Adela Periago; Valentin Cabañas; Mercedes Berenguer; María C García-Garay; Lourdes Gimeno; María F Soto-Ramírez; María D Martínez-Hernández; Manuel Muro; Alfredo Minguela
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Zhijuan Zhu; Xiaofan Li; Yiping Liu; Ping Chen; Xianling Chen; Hua Li; Jiafu Huang; Yuanzhong Chen; Nainong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Multiple Extramedullary-Bone Related and/or Extramedullary Extraosseous Are Independent Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  JingSong He; XiaoYan Yue; DongHua He; Yi Zhao; Yang Yang; GaoFeng Zheng; Enfan Zhang; XiaoYan Han; WenJun Wu; Li Yang; Jing Chen; Zhen Cai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Identification of patients at high risk of secondary extramedullary multiple myeloma development.

Authors:  Martin Stork; Sabina Sevcikova; Jiri Minarik; Petra Krhovska; Jakub Radocha; Lenka Pospisilova; Lucie Brozova; Jiri Jarkovsky; Ivan Spicka; Jan Straub; Petr Pavlicek; Alexandra Jungova; Tomas Jelinek; Viera Sandecka; Vladimir Maisnar; Roman Hajek; Ludek Pour
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 8.615

Review 10.  Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Radhika Bansal; Sagar Rakshit; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.