AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinion of hospital nurses on a group of recommendations aimed at reducing low-value nursing care and, based on these results, to detect low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. BACKGROUND: Low-value nursing care refers to clinical practices with poor or no benefit for patients that may be harmful and a waste of resources. Detecting these practices and understanding nurses' perceptions are essential to developing effective interventions to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a survey in a tertiary hospital. STROBE guidelines were followed. The questionnaire appraised nurses' agreement, subjective adherence and perception of usefulness of a group of recommendations to reduce low-value nursing care from Choosing Wisely and other initiatives. Practices described in recommendations with an agreement over 70% and a subjective adherence under 70% were categorised as low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 265 nurses from eight areas of care participated in the survey. The response rate by area ranged between 2%-55%. From the 38 recommendations evaluated, agreement was 96% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 95%-97%), median subjective adherence was 80% (95%CI, 80%-85%), and usefulness was 90% (95%CI, 89%-92%). Based on these results, we detected seven (0-15) low-value practices probably existing in our hospital, mostly on general practice, pregnancy care and wound care. CONCLUSIONS: We found a great understanding of low-value care between nurses, given the high agreement to recommendations and perception of usefulness. However, several low-value practices may be present in nursing care, requiring actions to reduce them, for instance, reviewing institutional protocols and involving patients in de-implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospitals and other settings should be aware of low-value practices and take actions to identify and reduce them. A survey may be a simple and helpful way to start this process.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinion of hospital nurses on a group of recommendations aimed at reducing low-value nursing care and, based on these results, to detect low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. BACKGROUND: Low-value nursing care refers to clinical practices with poor or no benefit for patients that may be harmful and a waste of resources. Detecting these practices and understanding nurses' perceptions are essential to developing effective interventions to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a survey in a tertiary hospital. STROBE guidelines were followed. The questionnaire appraised nurses' agreement, subjective adherence and perception of usefulness of a group of recommendations to reduce low-value nursing care from Choosing Wisely and other initiatives. Practices described in recommendations with an agreement over 70% and a subjective adherence under 70% were categorised as low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 265 nurses from eight areas of care participated in the survey. The response rate by area ranged between 2%-55%. From the 38 recommendations evaluated, agreement was 96% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 95%-97%), median subjective adherence was 80% (95%CI, 80%-85%), and usefulness was 90% (95%CI, 89%-92%). Based on these results, we detected seven (0-15) low-value practices probably existing in our hospital, mostly on general practice, pregnancy care and wound care. CONCLUSIONS: We found a great understanding of low-value care between nurses, given the high agreement to recommendations and perception of usefulness. However, several low-value practices may be present in nursing care, requiring actions to reduce them, for instance, reviewing institutional protocols and involving patients in de-implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospitals and other settings should be aware of low-value practices and take actions to identify and reduce them. A survey may be a simple and helpful way to start this process.
Authors: Tessa Rietbergen; Denise Spoon; Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders; Jan W Schoones; Anita Huis; Maud Heinen; Anke Persoon; Monique van Dijk; Hester Vermeulen; Erwin Ista; Leti van Bodegom-Vos Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 7.327