Literature DB >> 31287391

Management of Thyroid Nodules Seen on US Images: Deep Learning May Match Performance of Radiologists.

Mateusz Buda1, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner1, Jenny K Hoang1, David Thayer1, Franklin N Tessler1, William D Middleton1, Maciej A Mazurowski1.   

Abstract

BackgroundManagement of thyroid nodules may be inconsistent between different observers and time consuming for radiologists. An artificial intelligence system that uses deep learning may improve radiology workflow for management of thyroid nodules.PurposeTo develop a deep learning algorithm that uses thyroid US images to decide whether a thyroid nodule should undergo a biopsy and to compare the performance of the algorithm with the performance of radiologists who adhere to American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, studies in patients referred for US with subsequent fine-needle aspiration or with surgical histologic analysis used as the standard were evaluated. The study period was from August 2006 to May 2010. A multitask deep convolutional neural network was trained to provide biopsy recommendations for thyroid nodules on the basis of two orthogonal US images as the input. In the training phase, the deep learning algorithm was first evaluated by using 10-fold cross-validation. Internal validation was then performed on an independent set of 99 consecutive nodules. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were compared with a consensus of three ACR TI-RADS committee experts and nine other radiologists, all of whom interpreted thyroid US images in clinical practice.ResultsIncluded were 1377 thyroid nodules in 1230 patients with complete imaging data and conclusive cytologic or histologic diagnoses. For the 99 test nodules, the proposed deep learning algorithm achieved 13 of 15 (87%: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67%, 100%) sensitivity, the same as expert consensus (P > .99) and higher than five of nine radiologists. The specificity of the deep learning algorithm was 44 of 84 (52%; 95% CI: 42%, 62%), which was similar to expert consensus (43 of 84; 51%; 95% CI: 41%, 62%; P = .91) and higher than seven of nine other radiologists. The mean sensitivity and specificity for the nine radiologists was 83% (95% CI: 64%, 98%) and 48% (95% CI: 37%, 59%), respectively.ConclusionSensitivity and specificity of a deep learning algorithm for thyroid nodule biopsy recommendations was similar to that of expert radiologists who used American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System guidelines.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31287391     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  We All Need a Little Magic.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-07-31

2.  A comparison of artificial intelligence versus radiologists in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules using ultrasonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pimrada Potipimpanon; Natamon Charakorn; Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  Toward Reduction in False-Positive Thyroid Nodule Biopsies with a Deep Learning-based Risk Stratification System Using US Cine-Clip Images.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Terry S Desser; Rikiya Yamashita; Tara Kapoor; Minhaj Nur Alam; Alfiia Galimzianova; Saad Ali Syed; Mete Ugur Akdogan; Emel Alkim; Andrew Louis Wentland; Nikhil Madhuripan; Daniel Goff; Victoria Barbee; Natasha Diba Sheybani; Hersh Sagreiya
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 4.  Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Samantha Tso; Jessica Rabski; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Deep Learning Based on ACR TI-RADS Can Improve the Differential Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Ge-Ge Wu; Wen-Zhi Lv; Rui Yin; Jian-Wei Xu; Yu-Jing Yan; Rui-Xue Chen; Jia-Yu Wang; Bo Zhang; Xin-Wu Cui; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Convolutional Neural Network to Stratify the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance Compared with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Implemented by Experienced Radiologists.

Authors:  G R Kim; E Lee; H R Kim; J H Yoon; V Y Park; J Y Kwak
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 7.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

Review 8.  Personalized Diagnosis in Differentiated Thyroid Cancers by Molecular and Functional Imaging Biomarkers: Present and Future.

Authors:  Laura Teodoriu; Letitia Leustean; Maria-Christina Ungureanu; Stefana Bilha; Irena Grierosu; Mioara Matei; Cristina Preda; Cipriana Stefanescu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10

Review 9.  Contemporary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Giorgio Grani; Marialuisa Sponziello; Valeria Pecce; Valeria Ramundo; Cosimo Durante
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Visual Interpretability in Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules Using Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Xi Wei; Jialin Zhu; Haozhi Zhang; Hongyan Gao; Ruiguo Yu; Zhiqiang Liu; Xiangqian Zheng; Ming Gao; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.