Literature DB >> 31287381

Mutagenicity assessment of food contact material migrates with the Ames MPF assay.

Bernhard Rainer1, Elisa Mayrhofer2, Miriam Redl1, Irene Dolak1, Daniela Mislivececk2, Thomas Czerny1, Christian Kirchnawy2, Maricel Marin-Kuan3, Benoît Schilter3, Manfred Tacker1.   

Abstract

A major challenge in the safety assessment of food contact materials (FCM) is the evaluation of unknown non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). Even though consumer exposure levels may be quantitatively low, these substances are considered to be of high toxicological concern if they act as DNA reactive mutagens. From a safety assessment perspective, it is therefore important to detect their presence in FCM migrates. The present study applied the Ames MPF assay to assess the mutagenicity of migrates obtained from 30 food contact material samples out of 3 categories: plastics, composite materials and coatings. As a food simulant, 95% ethanol (EtOH) had a superior performance to less volatile simulants when evaluating recovery rates of representative model substances in different volatility categories. To monitor possible interference of the FCM matrix with Ames MPF results, migrates were spiked with reference substances and recovery rates were established. Out of 30 samples tested, two caused significant inhibition of revertant formation in the presence of the spiking control. Overall detection limits of the applied test method were estimated by determination of the lowest effective concentrations (LEC) for 10 Ames-positive substances. Even though the current limits of detection are not sufficient to entirely fulfil regulatory and safety requirements, three out of 30 FCMs showed evidence of dose-dependent effects in the Ames MPF assay. Overall, the data obtained supported the relevance of testing FCM migrates for DNA reactive contaminants and showed the value of the Ames MPF assay for the safety assessment of FCMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioassays; Ames MPF assay; Ames test; Food contact materials; genotoxicity; migrate; non-intentionally added substances; packaging safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31287381     DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1634841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess        ISSN: 1944-0057


  4 in total

1.  HepGentox: a novel promising HepG2 reportergene-assay for the detection of genotoxic substances in complex mixtures.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Christina Friedl; Alexandra Irnesberger; Thomas Czerny; Tina Piwonka; Alfonso Peñarroya; Manfred Tacker; Elisabeth Riegel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Incorporation of Metabolic Activation in the HPTLC-SOS-Umu-C Bioassay to Detect Low Levels of Genotoxic Chemicals in Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Emma Debon; Paul Rogeboz; Hélia Latado; Gertrud E Morlock; Daniel Meyer; Claudine Cottet-Fontannaz; Gabriele Scholz; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-27

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22

4.  Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats.

Authors:  Bernhard Rainer; Elisabeth Pinter; Lukas Prielinger; Chiara Coppola; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Benoit Schilter; Silvia Apprich; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.