Literature DB >> 31287237

Pulmonary embolism in intensive care units: More frequent or more Known? Prospective study of 75 cases.

Mabrouk Bahloul1,2, Kais Regaieg1,2, Mariem Dlela1,2, Olfa Turki1,2, Hana Nouri1,2, Sabrine Bradaii1,2, Chokri Ben Hamida1,2, Nadia Khlaf Bouaziz3, Imen Chabchoub4, Sondes Haddar5, Hedi Chelly1,2, Mounir Bouaziz1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to evaluate the current rate of pulmonary embolism (PE) in our medico-surgical intensive care unit (ICU), to identify risk factors, and to determine the outcome of PE in ICU.
METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients requiring intensive care admission during a one-year period. We included, in this prospective study, all the patients with confirmed PE admitted in ICU with more than 18 years of age, and expected to stay in ICU for more than 48 hours. Only the patients who had a clinical suspicion (unexplained hypoxemia and/or shock) for PE underwent diagnostic studies.
RESULTS: During the study period, 842 patients were admitted in our ICU. One hundred and two patients were excluded. The diagnosis of PE was confirmed in 75 patients (10.1%). In our study, all patients (100%) had received some forms of pharmaceutical prophylaxis (PP) during ICU stay. The median time from ICU admission to diagnosis of PE was 6 days. The diagnosis of PE was made by spiral CT in 74 patients (98.7%), and by echocardiography in 1 case (1.3%). The mean ICU stay was 26.3 ± 26.5 days (median: 20 days). During their ICU stay, 73 patients (97.3%) developed one, or more, organ failure. Respiratory failure was the most observed (97.3%). Moreover, 38 patients (50.6%) developed nosocomial infections and 29 (38.6%) died. The multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors associated with mortality were the presence of shock the day of PE diagnosis and the presence of right ventricular dilatation on echocardiography.
CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that subjects in the ICU are at high risk of PE, due to a high number of risk-factors. PE was associated with higher ICU mortality and a significantly higher ICU LOS. Our results invite to revise the preventive strategies of deep venous thrombosis and PE in patients requiring ICU admission.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intensive care unit; outcome; pulmonary embolism; shock index

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31287237     DOI: 10.1111/crj.13053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Respir J        ISSN: 1752-6981            Impact factor:   2.570


  3 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Pulmonary Embolism in ICU Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study from the MIMIC-III Database.

Authors:  Cheng-Bin Huang; Chen-Xuan Hong; Tian-Hao Xu; Ding-Yun Zhao; Zong-Yi Wu; Liang Chen; Jun Xie; Chen Jin; Bing-Zhang Wang; Lei Yang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Where do we stand with antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with COVID-19?

Authors:  Alessandro Ciavarella; Flora Peyvandi; Ida Martinelli
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Application of Precise Positioning for Sputum Expectoration in ICU Patients with Pulmonary Infection.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Mingyue Wang; Weiwei Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.