Literature DB >> 3128660

Ganglion cell performance at absolute threshold in toad retina: effects of dark events in rods.

D R Copenhagen1, K Donner, T Reuter.   

Abstract

1. The performance of ganglion cells in detecting flashes of light near the absolute threshold was studied in an isolated eye-cup preparation of toad retina. Retinal ganglion cells, through which all visual information from the rods must flow to the brain, are in a key position for evaluating the still unproven hypothesis that the absolute light sensitivity is limited by rod noise (Barlow, 1956). 2. The dark-adapted threshold intensity for these cells, which were selected on the basis of their high sensitivity, averaged 0.029 Rh* flash-1 (range 0.008-0.062), where Rh* signifies one photoisomerization per rod. On average, 46 photoisomerizations were needed per receptive field per flash to evoke a threshold response (range 16-84). 3. In the threshold region, frequency of responses versus mean flash intensity was determined. Threshold performance could be described by theoretical frequency of response curves, allowing intrinsic noise to be estimated in terms of an equivalent rate of photoisomerization-like (dark) events. In two completely characterized cells the rate of dark events corresponded to 0.03 and 0.06 Rh*DS-1, where Rh*D signifies one dark event per rod. 4. Threshold elevations produced by dim backgrounds were studied. The results of these experiments are consistent with a dark event rate equivalent to 0.046 Rh*DS-1, or 0.037 Rh*DS-1 after correcting for a probable decrease in summation time. 5. The rate of actual dark events (0.028 Rh*DS-1, 20 degrees C) measured in Bufo rods (Baylor, Lamb & Yau, 1980) is close to the equivalent rates determined here. Thus, for the ganglion cells signalling the dimmest lights, the dark events in rods appear to be the most significant intrinsic retinal noise source limiting detection.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3128660      PMCID: PMC1192417          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  32 in total

1.  Photoreceptor coupling in retina of the toad, Bufo marinus. II. Physiology.

Authors:  G H Gold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Quantum sensitivity of rods in the toad retina.

Authors:  G L Fain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Functional characteristics of lateral interactions between rods in the retina of the snapping turtle.

Authors:  D R Copenhagen; W G Owen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Evidence for passive electrotonic interactions in red rods of toad retina.

Authors:  H F Leeper; R A Normann; D R Copenhagen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Does the random distribution of discrete photoreceptor events limit the sensitivity of the retina?

Authors:  T Reuter; K Donner; D R Copenhagen
Journal:  Neurosci Res Suppl       Date:  1986

6.  Movement-sensitive neurones in the toad's retina.

Authors:  J P Ewert; F Hock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The photosensitivities of visual pigments in the presence of hydroxylamine.

Authors:  H J Dartnall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Sensitivity of toad rods: Dependence on wave-length and background illumination.

Authors:  G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Rod and cone inputs to bipolar cells in goldfish retina.

Authors:  A T Ishida; W K Stell; D O Lightfoot
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION.

Authors:  S Hecht; S Shlaer; M H Pirenne
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1942-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  15 in total

1.  Non-linear, high-gain and sustained-to-transient signal transmission from rods to amacrine cells in dark-adapted retina of Ambystoma.

Authors:  Xiong-Li Yang; Fan Gao; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The frequency of isomerization-like 'dark' events in rhodopsin and porphyropsin rods of the bull-frog retina.

Authors:  K Donner; M L Firsov; V I Govardovskii
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A clockwork hypothesis: synaptic release by rod photoreceptors must be regular.

Authors:  Stan Schein; Kareem M Ahmad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Detection sensitivity and temporal resolution of visual signals near absolute threshold in the salamander retina.

Authors:  E J Chichilnisky; F Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Temperature effects on low-light vision in juvenile rockfish (genus Sebastes) and consequences for habitat utilization.

Authors:  C R L Reilly; S H Thompson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Molecular origin of continuous dark noise in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  F Rieke; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Effect of hydroxylamine on photon-like events during dark adaptation in toad rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  C S Leibrock; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Cell type-specific changes in retinal ganglion cell function induced by rod death and cone reorganization in rats.

Authors:  Wan-Qing Yu; Norberto M Grzywacz; Eun-Jin Lee; Greg D Field
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Synaptic transfer of rod signals to horizontal and bipolar cells in the retina of the toad (Bufo marinus).

Authors:  J H Belgum; D R Copenhagen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Visual performance of the toad (Bufo bufo) at low light levels: retinal ganglion cell responses and prey-catching accuracy.

Authors:  A C Aho; K Donner; S Helenius; L O Larsen; T Reuter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.