BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the predictive ability of risk calculators of the EuroSCORE II and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) during a 30-day and 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on a group of consecutive patients with hemodynamically significant aortic valve stenosis that underwent elective valve replacement surgery. The risk of surgery using EuroSCORE II and STS was calculated for each patient. The primary and secondary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: The study group included 428 consecutive patients who underwent replacement of the aortic valve. Thirteen patients died during the 30-day follow-up and 25 patients died during 1-year follow-up. Actual mortality in 30-day observation was 3.0% compared to the predicted 2.9% using EuroSCORE II and 2.1% for STS. The discriminations of ES II and STS score were above 0.8 for mortality prediction during the 30-day and 1-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroSCORE II and STS score showed satisfactory discrimination and calibration for predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing AVR.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the predictive ability of risk calculators of the EuroSCORE II and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) during a 30-day and 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on a group of consecutive patients with hemodynamically significant aortic valve stenosis that underwent elective valve replacement surgery. The risk of surgery using EuroSCORE II and STS was calculated for each patient. The primary and secondary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: The study group included 428 consecutive patients who underwent replacement of the aortic valve. Thirteen patients died during the 30-day follow-up and 25 patients died during 1-year follow-up. Actual mortality in 30-day observation was 3.0% compared to the predicted 2.9% using EuroSCORE II and 2.1% for STS. The discriminations of ES II and STS score were above 0.8 for mortality prediction during the 30-day and 1-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroSCORE II and STS score showed satisfactory discrimination and calibration for predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing AVR.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aortic stenosis; EuroSCORE II; Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); risk stratification
Authors: Samer A M Nashef; François Roques; Linda D Sharples; Johan Nilsson; Christopher Smith; Antony R Goldstone; Ulf Lockowandt Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Menno van Gameren; A Pieter Kappetein; Ewout W Steyerberg; Angeliek C Venema; Els A J Berenschot; Edward L Hannan; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: James S Gammie; Sean M O'Brien; Bartley P Griffith; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alessandro Parolari; Lorenzo L Pesce; Matteo Trezzi; Laura Cavallotti; Samer Kassem; Claudia Loardi; Davide Pacini; Elena Tremoli; Francesco Alamanni Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Alec Vahanian; Ottavio Alfieri; Felicita Andreotti; Manuel J Antunes; Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias; Helmut Baumgartner; Michael Andrew Borger; Thierry P Carrel; Michele De Bonis; Arturo Evangelista; Volkmar Falk; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Luc Pierard; Susanna Price; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Gerhard Schuler; Janina Stepinska; Karl Swedberg; Johanna Takkenberg; Ulrich Otto Von Oppell; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Marian Zembala Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: John Chalmers; Mark Pullan; Brian Fabri; James McShane; Matthew Shaw; Neeraj Mediratta; Michael Poullis Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.191