Literature DB >> 31285157

Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.

Majd Hasanin1, Sarah E F Kaplan2, Brian Hohlen3, Connie Lai4, Rawan Nagshabandi5, Xing Zhu6, Thikriat Al-Jewair7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients in active fixed orthodontic treatment or fixed retention phase may require magnetic resonance (MR) scans of the head and neck region. Orthodontists are challenged to decide whether to keep or remove orthodontic appliances prior to the scans. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of MR images.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched, with no language restrictions, from database inception to October 2016: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBMR. A search in Google Scholar and ProQuest, as well as a manual search, were also conducted. Two independent reviewers assessed articles for inclusion. Original studies including any orthodontic appliance on human subjects were considered. Outcomes measured were development of artefacts, diagnostic quality, accuracy, and treatment outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment and QUADAS-2 tools.
RESULTS: Five of 1052 studies identified were included in the final qualitative synthesis. A total of 90 adult human subjects were included. Orthodontic appliances evaluated were brackets, bands, archwires, and fixed retainers. The outcomes assessed were production of artefacts, diagnostic quality and diagnostic accuracy. Detrimental effects on diagnostic quality, and subsequently diagnostic accuracy, rose with increased stainless steel (SS) and proximity to anatomic area of interest. Orthodontic appliances may render images uninterpretable and non-diagnostic.
CONCLUSIONS: There is fair evidence to suggest orthodontic appliances, mainly those with SS, cause MR artefacts. Removal of metal orthodontic appliances prior to MR scans is recommended, especially if the area of interest is near the orthodontic appliance. Additional evidence is needed to provide guidelines to clinicians.
Copyright © 2019 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artefacts; Artéfacts; Attaches orthodontiques; Fils orthodontiques; Imagerie par résonance; Magnetic; Magnétique; Orthodontic appliances; Orthodontic brackets; Orthodontic wires; Resonance imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31285157     DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthod        ISSN: 1761-7727


  4 in total

1.  MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Fanni Dembrovszky; Tamás Vízkelety; Péter Barsi; Fanni Juhász; Csaba Dobó-Nagy
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Effects on Metallic Brackets and Wires: Does It Alter the Temperature and Bonding Efficacy of Orthodontic Devices?

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Lorenzo Preda; Fabrizio Calliada; Lorenzo Carbone; Luca Lungarotti; Luisa Bernardinelli; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christoph Roser; Tim Hilgenfeld; Sinan Sen; Tobias Badrow; Sebastian Zingler; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Christopher J Lux; Alexander Juerchott
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The interaction and interference of preformed metal crowns on magnetic resonance imaging: a scoping review with a systematic methodology.

Authors:  O Sumner; R Goldsmith; N Heath; G D Taylor
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-06-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.