Literature DB >> 31285057

A comparison of collision cross section values obtained via travelling wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry and ultra high performance liquid chromatography-ion mobility-mass spectrometry: Application to the characterisation of metabolites in rat urine.

Leanne C Nye1, Jonathan P Williams2, Nyasha C Munjoma1, Marine P M Letertre3, Muireann Coen4, Robbin Bouwmeester5, Lennart Martens5, Jonathan R Swann3, Jeremy K Nicholson6, Robert S Plumb7, Michael McCullagh2, Lee A Gethings2, Steven Lai8, James I Langridge2, Johannes P C Vissers9, Ian D Wilson10.   

Abstract

A comprehensive Collision Cross Section (CCS) library was obtained via Travelling Wave Ion Guide mobility measurements through direct infusion (DI). The library consists of CCS and Mass Spectral (MS) data in negative and positive ElectroSpray Ionisation (ESI) mode for 463 and 479 endogenous metabolites, respectively. For both ionisation modes combined, TWCCSN2 data were obtained for 542 non-redundant metabolites. These data were acquired on two different ion mobility enabled orthogonal acceleration QToF MS systems in two different laboratories, with the majority of the resulting TWCCSN2 values (from detected compounds) found to be within 1% of one another. Validation of these results against two independent, external TWCCSN2 data sources and predicted TWCCSN2 values indicated to be within 1-2% of these other values. The same metabolites were then analysed using a rapid reversed-phase ultra (high) performance liquid chromatographic (U(H)PLC) separation combined with IM and MS (IM-MS) thus providing retention time (tr), m/z and TWCCSN2 values (with the latter compared with the DI-IM-MS data). Analytes for which TWCCSN2 values were obtained by U(H)PLC-IM-MS showed good agreement with the results obtained from DI-IM-MS. The repeatability of the TWCCSN2 values obtained for these metabolites on the different ion mobility QToF systems, using either DI or LC, encouraged the further evaluation of the U(H)PLC-IM-MS approach via the analysis of samples of rat urine, from control and methotrexate-treated animals, in order to assess the potential of the approach for metabolite identification and profiling in metabolic phenotyping studies. Based on the database derived from the standards 63 metabolites were identified in rat urine, using positive ESI, based on the combination of tr, TWCCSN2 and MS data.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collision cross section; Ion mobility spectrometry; Metabolic phenotyping; Metabolomics; Metabonomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31285057     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  7 in total

1.  In Silico Collision Cross Section Calculations to Aid Metabolite Annotation.

Authors:  Susanta Das; Kiyoto Aramis Tanemura; Laleh Dinpazhoh; Mithony Keng; Christina Schumm; Lydia Leahy; Carter K Asef; Markace Rainey; Arthur S Edison; Facundo M Fernández; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.262

Review 2.  [Applications of ion mobility-mass spectrometry in the chemical analysis in traditional Chinese medicines].

Authors:  Rongrong Zhai; Wen Gao; Mengning Li; Hua Yang
Journal:  Se Pu       Date:  2022-09

3.  Paper Spray Ionization Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry of Sebum Classifies Biomarker Classes for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Depanjan Sarkar; Eleanor Sinclair; Sze Hway Lim; Caitlin Walton-Doyle; Kaneez Jafri; Joy Milne; Johannes P C Vissers; Keith Richardson; Drupad K Trivedi; Monty Silverdale; Perdita Barran
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Travelling Wave Ion Mobility-Derived Collision Cross Section for Mycotoxins: Investigating Interlaboratory and Interplatform Reproducibility.

Authors:  Laura Righetti; Nicola Dreolin; Alberto Celma; Mike McCullagh; Gitte Barknowitz; Juan V Sancho; Chiara Dall'Asta
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  The Pharmacometabodynamics of Gefitinib after Intravenous Administration to Mice: A Preliminary UPLC-IM-MS Study.

Authors:  Billy Molloy; Lauren Mullin; Adam King; Lee A Gethings; Robert S Plumb; Ian D Wilson
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-06-11

6.  Recurrent Topics in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics-Standardization, Coverage, and Throughput.

Authors:  Evelyn Rampler; Yasin El Abiead; Harald Schoeny; Mate Rusz; Felina Hildebrand; Veronika Fitz; Gunda Koellensperger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Prediction of Collision Cross Section Values: Application to Non-Intentionally Added Substance Identification in Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Xue-Chao Song; Nicola Dreolin; Tito Damiani; Elena Canellas; Cristina Nerin
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.