Literature DB >> 31285024

Perceptual learning in the chemical senses: A review.

Charles Spence1.   

Abstract

People have been writing about perceptual learning and expertise in the chemical senses for more than a century now, with a particular focus on the world of wine. However, the problem with many of the cross-sectional studies of wine expertise that have been published to date is that they simply cannot rule out the possibility that those with superior chemosensory abilities end-up gravitating toward a career in wine. Definitions of expertise also tend to vary widely between studies, making direct comparison of the results obtained rather difficult. By contrast, the longitudinal learning studies that have been published have typically only assessed the effects of relatively small amounts of training. And, taken as a whole, the majority of studies in this area tend to look statistically underpowered nowadays in terms of the sample sizes that have been used. Nevertheless, despite these limitations, the literature converges on the conclusion that chemosensory perceptual learning does occur, though the gains (e.g., in terms of lower detection thresholds) are usually modest at best, and tend to be highly stimulus-specific. By contrast, cognitive/semantic improvements in describing/discriminating wines, and wine-relevant compounds, as well as the acquisition of relevant conceptual knowledge, are much more salient differentiators in the cross-sectional empirical literature. Enhanced attention and olfactory recognition memory abilities have also been reported amongst wine experts. Looking to the future, the hope is that the insights garnered from studies of perceptual learning in the higher spatial senses may help to optimize the training regimes for those wishing to enhance their wine-tasting abilities, and perhaps also aid recovery in those suffering from olfactory loss.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Beer; Chemical senses; Expertise; Olfaction; Perceptual learning; Wine

Year:  2019        PMID: 31285024     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Res Int        ISSN: 0963-9969            Impact factor:   6.475


  5 in total

Review 1.  Wine psychology: basic & applied.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-13

2.  A Comparison of Two Sensory Panels Trained with Different Feedback Calibration Range Specifications via Sensory Description of Five Beers.

Authors:  Line Elgaard; Line A Mielby; Helene Hopfer; Derek V Byrne
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-11-01

3.  Study of consistency of expert evaluations of wine sensory characteristics by positional analysis.

Authors:  A A Khalafyan; Z A Temerdashev; V A Akin'shina; Yu F Yakuba
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-02

4.  Improving taste sensitivity in healthy adults using taste recall training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuta Otsubo; Midori Miyagi; Hideki Sekiya; Osamu Kano; Satoru Ebihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Flavor education and training in olfactory dysfunction: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gerold Besser; Michaela M Oswald; David T Liu; Bertold Renner; Christian A Mueller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.