| Literature DB >> 31284994 |
Luana Haselein Maurer1, Cinthia Baú Betim Cazarin2, Andréia Quatrin3, Natália Machado Minuzzi4, Eduarda Lasch Costa4, Joseane Morari5, Lício Augusto Velloso5, Raquel Franco Leal6, Eliseu Rodrigues7, Vivian Caetano Bochi8, Mário Roberto Maróstica Júnior2, Tatiana Emanuelli9.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases are characterized by impaired intestinal barrier function. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of grape peel powder (GPP) and its bioactive rich-fractions on the barrier function and colonic injury in a model of colitis induced by 2,4,6 trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS). Wistar rats received diets supplemented with either GPP (8%), extractable polyphenols (EP), non-extractable polyphenols-rich fraction (NEP-F), or polyphenols-poor, fiber-rich fraction (F) from grapes at amounts equivalent to the GPP group during 15 days before and for 7 days after colitis induction. NEP-F has decreased the extension of colonic lesion but the other grape peel bioactive fractions did not protect against macroscopic or microscopic colonic damage, EP diet increased macroscopic colonic damage. GPP, EP, and NEP-F reduced claudin-2 mRNA expression, whereas GPP and F fraction increased occludin and ZO-1 mRNA expression. All experimental diets reduced the colitis-triggered increase of MMP-9 mRNA expression. Colitis reduced by 30% the production of cecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). GPP and NEP-F completely protected against this effect, whereas F fraction was ineffective. Only GPP and NEP-F were able to decrease the upregulation of GRP94 mRNA triggered by colitis. Dietary fiber seems to reestablish the intestinal barrier function, whereas fiber-bound phenolics were able to restore cecal metabolism to produce beneficial metabolites like SCFA and to reduce the activation of the unfolded protein response.Entities:
Keywords: Barrier function; Inflammation; Matrix-bound polyphenols; Short-chain fatty acids; Tight junctions; Unfolded protein response
Year: 2019 PMID: 31284994 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Res Int ISSN: 0963-9969 Impact factor: 6.475