Kristina L Guyton1, Zoe C Levine1, Ann C Lowry2, Laura Lambert3, Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp4, Neil Hyman1, Olga Zaborina1, John Alverdy1. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacteria that produce collagen-digesting enzymes (collagenolytic bacteria) have been shown to play a critical and previously unappreciated role in anastomotic leak pathogenesis by breaking down host tissue extracellular matrix proteins. Detection of these bacteria is labor intensive, and no screening method currently exists. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a rapid screening method developed to detect the presence of these collagenolytic bacteria in clinical samples, such as drain fluid, anastomotic tissue, or feces. DESIGN: We compared a new method of detecting collagenolytic bacterial species with a previously used technique using samples from a murine experimental model and then demonstrated the utility of this screening method in samples from patients with anastomotic complications. SETTINGS: All of the laboratory work and previous murine experiments were performed in Dr Alverdy's laboratory at the University of Chicago under institutional review board-approved protocols. PATIENTS: Samples from patients with challenging wound complications were provided by participating clinicians with verbal patient consent. Given the small number of patients, this was determined to be institutional review board exempt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether this analysis can influence patient management and outcomes will require additional study. RESULTS: This screening method detects numerous strains of bacteria with collagenolytic properties, including the collagenolytic species that have been implicated previously in anastomotic leak. Once collagenolytic strains are identified, they can be speciated and tested for antibiotic resistance using standard laboratory techniques. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patient samples tested. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential applicability of this assay to evaluate rare and complex anastomotic complications that often require analysis beyond standard culture and sensitivity assays. Future applications of this method may allow the development of strategies to prevent anastomotic leak related to collagenolytic bacteria. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A962.
BACKGROUND: Bacteria that produce collagen-digesting enzymes (collagenolytic bacteria) have been shown to play a critical and previously unappreciated role in anastomotic leak pathogenesis by breaking down host tissue extracellular matrix proteins. Detection of these bacteria is labor intensive, and no screening method currently exists. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a rapid screening method developed to detect the presence of these collagenolytic bacteria in clinical samples, such as drain fluid, anastomotic tissue, or feces. DESIGN: We compared a new method of detecting collagenolytic bacterial species with a previously used technique using samples from a murine experimental model and then demonstrated the utility of this screening method in samples from patients with anastomotic complications. SETTINGS: All of the laboratory work and previous murine experiments were performed in Dr Alverdy's laboratory at the University of Chicago under institutional review board-approved protocols. PATIENTS: Samples from patients with challenging wound complications were provided by participating clinicians with verbal patient consent. Given the small number of patients, this was determined to be institutional review board exempt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether this analysis can influence patient management and outcomes will require additional study. RESULTS: This screening method detects numerous strains of bacteria with collagenolytic properties, including the collagenolytic species that have been implicated previously in anastomotic leak. Once collagenolytic strains are identified, they can be speciated and tested for antibiotic resistance using standard laboratory techniques. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patient samples tested. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential applicability of this assay to evaluate rare and complex anastomotic complications that often require analysis beyond standard culture and sensitivity assays. Future applications of this method may allow the development of strategies to prevent anastomotic leak related to collagenolytic bacteria. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A962.
Authors: Thomas E Serena; Breda M Cullen; Simon W Bayliff; Molly C Gibson; Marissa J Carter; Lingyun Chen; Raphael A Yaakov; John Samies; Matthew Sabo; Daniel DeMarco; Namchi Le; James Galbraith Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Benjamin D Shogan; Natalia Belogortseva; Preston M Luong; Alexander Zaborin; Simon Lax; Cindy Bethel; Marc Ward; Joseph P Muldoon; Mark Singer; Gary An; Konstantin Umanskiy; Vani Konda; Baddr Shakhsheer; James Luo; Robin Klabbers; Lynn E Hancock; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Jennifer Defazio; Irma D Fleming; Baddr Shakhsheer; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Surg Clin North Am Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Sanjiv K Hyoju; Robin E Klabbers; Melissa Aaron; Monika A Krezalek; Alexander Zaborin; Mara Wiegerinck; Neil H Hyman; Olga Zaborina; Harry Van Goor; John C Alverdy Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Baddr A Shakhsheer; Luke A Versten; James N Luo; Jennifer R Defazio; Robin Klabbers; Scott Christley; Alexander Zaborin; Kristina L Guyton; Monika Krezalek; Daniel P Smith; Nadim J Ajami; Joseph F Petrosino; Irma D Fleming; Natalia Belogortseva; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Benjamin D Shogan; Daniel P Smith; Scott Christley; Jack A Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Andrea D Olivas; Benjamin D Shogan; Vesta Valuckaite; Alexander Zaborin; Natalya Belogortseva; Mark Musch; Folker Meyer; William L Trimble; Gary An; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander Zaborin; Daniel Smith; Kevin Garfield; John Quensen; Baddr Shakhsheer; Matthew Kade; Matthew Tirrell; James Tiedje; Jack A Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: mBio Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Sara Gaines; Sanjiv Hyoju; Ashley J Williamson; Jasper B van Praagh; Olga Zaborina; David T Rubin; John C Alverdy; Benjamin D Shogan; Neil Hyman Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sara Gaines; Jasper B van Praagh; Ashley J Williamson; Richard A Jacobson; Sanjiv Hyoju; Alexander Zaborin; Jun Mao; Hyun Y Koo; Lindsay Alpert; Marc Bissonnette; Ralph Weichselbaum; Jack Gilbert; Eugene Chang; Neil Hyman; Olga Zaborina; Benjamin D Shogan; John C Alverdy Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Scott Christley; Benjamin Shogan; Zoe Levine; Hyun Koo; Kristina Guyton; Sarah Owens; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.240