Literature DB >> 31283038

Predictive Value of Midtrimester Universal Cervical Length Screening Based on Parity.

Joshua I Rosenbloom1, Nandini Raghuraman1, Lorene A Temming1, Molly J Stout1, Methodius G Tuuli1, Jeffery M Dicke1, George A Macones1, Alison G Cahill1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of parity on performance characteristics of midtrimester cervical length (CL) in predicting spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) before 37 weeks.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 13,508 women with no history of sPTB undergoing universal transvaginal CL screening at 17 to 23 weeks' gestation from 2011 to 2016. Patients who declined screening or with unknown delivery outcomes were excluded. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves were used to assess and compare the predictive ability of CL screening for sPTB. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated for specific CL cutoffs for prediction of sPTB.
RESULTS: There were 20,100 patients, of whom 2087 (10%) declined screening and 4505 (22%) did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 13,508 patients, 43% were nulliparous. The incidence rates of sPTB were 6.5% in nulliparas and 4.9% in multiparas (P < .001). The mean CLs were 39.9 mm in nulliparas and 41.8 mm in multiparas (P < .001), and those of the first percentiles were 19.0 mm in nulliparas and 24.0 mm in multiparas. Cervical length was significantly more predictive of sPTB in nulliparas (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70; versus 0.61, 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.63; P = .008). At CL cutoffs of 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm or less, the sensitivity was lower in multiparas, and the specificity was comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Midtrimester CL is less predictive of sPTB in multiparas compared to nulliparas. The poor predictive ability, especially in multiparas, calls into question the value of universal CL screening in this population.
© 2019 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical length; obstetrics; parity; preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31283038     DOI: 10.1002/jum.15091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  5 in total

1.  The Prediction of Preterm Birth Using Time-Series Technology-Based Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yichao Zhang; Sha Lu; Yina Wu; Wensheng Hu; Zhenming Yuan
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  The amniotic fluid proteome predicts imminent preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Dereje W Gudicha; Roberto Romero; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Jose Galaz; Gaurav Bhatti; Bogdan Done; Eunjung Jung; Dahiana M Gallo; Mariachiara Bosco; Manaphat Suksai; Ramiro Diaz-Primera; Piya Chaemsaithong; Francesca Gotsch; Stanley M Berry; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  The immunobiology of preterm labor and birth: intra-amniotic inflammation or breakdown of maternal-fetal homeostasis.

Authors:  Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Jose Galaz; Derek Miller; Marcelo Farias-Jofre; Zhenjie Liu; Marcia Arenas-Hernandez; Valeria Garcia-Flores; Zachary Shaffer; Jonathan M Greenberg; Kevin R Theis; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  A Nested Case-Control Study of the Relationship between Salivary Inflammatory Mediators, Periodontal Parameters, and Preterm Birth in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Min Wu; Chanjuan Ye; Huijun Li; Xiuqiao Yang; Sujun Zhu; Fangming Zhou; Ying Hao; Shaowu Chen; Shaoyun Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Personalized assessment of cervical length improves prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: a standard and a percentile calculator.

Authors:  Dereje W Gudicha; Roberto Romero; Doron Kabiri; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Percy Pacora; Offer Erez; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Eunjung Jung; Carmen Paredes; Stanley M Berry; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.661

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.