Literature DB >> 31282954

Safety and Efficacy of Edonerpic Maleate for Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lon S Schneider1, Ronald G Thomas2, Suzanne Hendrix3, Robert A Rissman2, James B Brewer2, David P Salmon2, Tilman Oltersdorf2, Tomohiro Okuda4, Howard H Feldman2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Edonerpic maleate (T-817MA) protects against Aβ40-induced neurotoxic effects and memory deficits, promotes neurite outgrowth, and preserves hippocampal synapses and spatial memory in tau transgenic mice. These effects may be mediated via sigma-1 receptor activation, delivery of synaptic AMPA receptors, or modulation of microglial function and may benefit patients with Alzheimer disease.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of edonerpic for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 clinical trial conducted over 52 weeks from June 2, 2014, to December 14, 2016, at 52 US clinical and academic centers. Of 822 outpatients screened, 484 met the following criteria and were randomly assigned to treatment: 55 to 85 years of age, probable Alzheimer disease, Mini-Mental State Examination scores from 12 to 22, and taking stable doses of donepezil or rivastigmine with or without memantine.
INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment (1:1:1 allocation) to placebo or 224 mg or 448 mg of edonerpic maleate, once per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary outcomes were scores on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) at week 52. Biomarkers were brain, lateral ventricular, and hippocampal volumes, as determined on magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, and phospho-tau181. The primary efficacy analysis was performed on the coprimary end points for the modified intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS: Of 482 participants in the safety population, 140 of 158 participants (88.6%) assigned to placebo, 117 of 166 participants (70.5%) to 224 mg of edonerpic maleate, and 120 of 158 participants (76.0%) to 448 mg of edonerpic maleate completed the trial. The mean ADAS-cog score change at week 52 was 7.91 for the placebo group, 7.45 for the 224-mg group, and 7.08 for the 448-mg group. Mean differences from placebo were -0.47 (95% CI, -2.36 to 1.43; P = .63) for the 224-mg group and -0.84 (95% CI, -2.75 to 1.08; P = .39) for the 448-mg group. Mean ADCS-CGIC scores were 5.22 for the placebo group, 5.24 for the 224-mg group, and 5.25 for the 448-mg group, with mean differences from placebo of 0.03 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.25; P = .81) for the 224-mg group and 0.04 (95% CI, -0.19 to 0.26; P = .76) for the 448-mg group. In the safety population, a total of 7 of 158 participants (4.4%) in the placebo group, 23 of 166 participants (13.9%) in the 224-mg group, and 23 of 158 participants (14.6%) in the 448-mg group discontinued because of adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Edonerpic maleate appeared to be safe and tolerable, with expected gastrointestinal symptoms occurring early but without evidence for a clinical effect among patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02079909.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31282954      PMCID: PMC6618817          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   29.907


  6 in total

1.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor for high-throughput evaluation of selective Sigma-1 receptor ligands.

Authors:  Dhwanil A Dalwadi; Stephanie Kim; John Schetz; Derek A Schreihofer; Seongcheol Kim
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.285

2.  Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2020.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Garam Lee; Aaron Ritter; Marwan Sabbagh; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2020-07-16

3.  Evaluation of edonerpic maleate as a CRMP2 inhibitor for pain relief.

Authors:  Aubin Moutal; Zhiming Shan; Victor G Miranda; Liberty François-Moutal; Cynthia L Madura; May Khanna; Rajesh Khanna
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 4.  The Potential of Small Molecules to Modulate the Mitochondria-Endoplasmic Reticulum Interplay in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Giacomo Dentoni; Laura Castro-Aldrete; Luana Naia; Maria Ankarcrona
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 5.  Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's Disease: Seeking Clarity in a Time of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Nurul Husna Ibrahim; Mohamad Fairuz Yahaya; Wael Mohamed; Seong Lin Teoh; Chua Kien Hui; Jaya Kumar
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Sigma receptors and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Agnieszka Piechal; Alicja Jakimiuk; Dagmara Mirowska-Guzel
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.024

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.