Brendan Smyth1,2, Anna Haber3, Konlawij Trongtrakul4, Carmel Hawley5,6, Vlado Perkovic1, Mark Woodward1,7,8, Meg Jardine1,9. 1. The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 2. Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 4. Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand. 5. Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 7. The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 9. Renal Unit, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Systematic differences between patients included in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the general patient population may influence the generalizability of RCT findings. Comprehensive national registries of patients with end-stage kidney disease who are undergoing dialysis provide a unique opportunity to compare trial and real-world patient cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To determine if participants in large, multicenter dialysis trials were similar to the general population undergoing dialysis in terms of age, comorbidities, and mortality rate. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched on January 6, 2017, for studies published from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. Data sources were published manuscripts, supplementary material, and trial registration information. Data on the general population undergoing dialysis were derived from the US Renal Data System (USRDS). Data were analyzed from March 17 to July 22, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials enrolling only participants undergoing dialysis for end-stage kidney disease with 100 or more adult participants from 2 or more sites. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Abstract screening and data extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was difference in mean age between the RCT and USRDS populations. Secondary outcomes included differences in mortality rate and comorbidities. RESULTS: The search identified 186 RCTs, enrolling 79 104 participants. Compared with the 2011 USRDS population, RCT participants were younger (mean age, 58.9 years; 95% CI, 58.3-59.5 years vs 61.2 years; P < .001), more likely to be male (58.9%; 95% CI, 57.6%-60.1% vs 55.7%; P < .001), and have coronary artery disease (26.9%; 95% CI, 22.2%-31.7% vs 17.7%; P < .001) and less likely to have diabetes (40.2%; 95% CI, 36.7%-43.6% vs 44.2%; P = .03) or heart failure (19.6%; 95% CI, 15.1%-24.0% vs 29.8%; P < .001). The mortality rate per 100 patient-years during trial participation was less than half that of the USRDS population (8.9; 95% CI, 7.8-10.0 vs 18.6; P < .001). The differences in age, mortality, and coronary artery disease remained when studies recruiting only from the United States were considered. Diabetes was more common in RCT participants from the United States than in the registry population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participants in large, multicenter RCTs of patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing dialysis are younger, have a different pattern of comorbidities, and have a lower mortality rate than the general population of patients undergoing dialysis. This finding has implications for the generalization of trial results to the broader patient population and for future trial design.
IMPORTANCE: Systematic differences between patients included in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the general patient population may influence the generalizability of RCT findings. Comprehensive national registries of patients with end-stage kidney disease who are undergoing dialysis provide a unique opportunity to compare trial and real-world patient cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To determine if participants in large, multicenter dialysis trials were similar to the general population undergoing dialysis in terms of age, comorbidities, and mortality rate. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched on January 6, 2017, for studies published from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. Data sources were published manuscripts, supplementary material, and trial registration information. Data on the general population undergoing dialysis were derived from the US Renal Data System (USRDS). Data were analyzed from March 17 to July 22, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials enrolling only participants undergoing dialysis for end-stage kidney disease with 100 or more adult participants from 2 or more sites. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Abstract screening and data extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was difference in mean age between the RCT and USRDS populations. Secondary outcomes included differences in mortality rate and comorbidities. RESULTS: The search identified 186 RCTs, enrolling 79 104 participants. Compared with the 2011 USRDS population, RCT participants were younger (mean age, 58.9 years; 95% CI, 58.3-59.5 years vs 61.2 years; P < .001), more likely to be male (58.9%; 95% CI, 57.6%-60.1% vs 55.7%; P < .001), and have coronary artery disease (26.9%; 95% CI, 22.2%-31.7% vs 17.7%; P < .001) and less likely to have diabetes (40.2%; 95% CI, 36.7%-43.6% vs 44.2%; P = .03) or heart failure (19.6%; 95% CI, 15.1%-24.0% vs 29.8%; P < .001). The mortality rate per 100 patient-years during trial participation was less than half that of the USRDS population (8.9; 95% CI, 7.8-10.0 vs 18.6; P < .001). The differences in age, mortality, and coronary artery disease remained when studies recruiting only from the United States were considered. Diabetes was more common in RCT participants from the United States than in the registry population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participants in large, multicenter RCTs of patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing dialysis are younger, have a different pattern of comorbidities, and have a lower mortality rate than the general population of patients undergoing dialysis. This finding has implications for the generalization of trial results to the broader patient population and for future trial design.
Authors: Michael K Sullivan; Alastair J Rankin; Bhautesh D Jani; Frances S Mair; Patrick B Mark Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Marco Trevisan; Edouard L Fu; Yang Xu; Kitty Jager; Carmine Zoccali; Friedo W Dekker; Juan Jesus Carrero Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Jay S Shavadia; Jonathan Wilson; Daniel Edmonston; Alyssa Platt; Patti Ephraim; Rasheeda Hall; Benjamin A Goldstein; L Ebony Boulware; Eric Peterson; Jane Pendergast; Julia J Scialla Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.099
Authors: Elliot J Lee; Aakil Patel; Rey R Acedillo; Jovina C Bachynski; Ian Barrett; Erika Basile; Marisa Battistella; Derek Benjamin; David Berry; Peter G Blake; Patricia Chan; Clara J Bohm; Kristin K Clemens; Charles Cook; Laura Dember; Jade S Dirk; Stephanie Dixon; Elisabeth Fowler; Leah Getchell; Nazanine Gholami; Cory Goldstein; Emma Hahn; Betty Hogeterp; Susan Huang; Michelle Hughes; Meg J Jardine; Shasikara Kalatharan; Shane Kilburn; Eduardo Lacson; Sean Leonard; Channing Liberty; Craig Lindsay; Jennifer M MacRae; Braden J Manns; Janice McCallum; Christopher W McIntyre; Amber O Molnar; Reem A Mustafa; Gihad E Nesrallah; Matthew J Oliver; Michael Pandes; Sanjay Pandeya; Malvinder S Parmar; Elijah Z Rabin; Johnathan Riley; Samuel A Silver; Jessica M Sontrop; Manish M Sood; Rita S Suri; Navdeep Tangri; Daniel J Tascona; Alison Thomas; Ron Wald; Michael Walsh; Charles Weijer; Matthew A Weir; Hans Vorster; Deborah Zimmerman; Amit X Garg Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2019-12-26
Authors: Brendan Smyth; Konlawij Trongtrakul; Anna Haber; B Talbot; Carmel Hawley; Vlado Perkovic; Mark Woodward; Meg Jardine Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-11-12