| Literature DB >> 31282416 |
Carolina Alves1,2, Lília Jorge1,2, Nádia Canário1,2, Beatriz Santiago3, Isabel Santana3, João Castelhano1,2,4, António Francisco Ambrósio5,6,4, Rui Bernardes1,2,4, Miguel Castelo-Branco1,2,4.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the relationship between structural changes in the retina and white matter in the brain, in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Twenty-three healthy controls (mean age = 63.4±7.5 years) and seventeen AD patients (mean age = 66.5±6.6 years) were recruited for this study. By combining two imaging techniques-optical coherence tomography and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-the association between changes in the thickness of individual retinal layers and white matter dysfunction in early AD was assessed. Retinal layers were segmented, and thickness measurements were obtained for each layer. DTI images were analyzed with a quantitative data-driven approach to evaluating whole-brain diffusion metrics, using tract-based spatial statistics. Diffusion metrics, such as fractional anisotropy, are markers for white matter integrity. Multivariate and partial correlation analyses evaluating the association between individual retinal layers thickness and diffusion metrics were performed. We found that axial diffusivity, indexing axonal integrity, was significantly reduced in AD (p = 0.016, Cohen's d = 1.004) while in the retina, only a marginal trend for significance was found for the outer plexiform layer (p = 0.084, Cohen's d = 0.688). Furthermore, a positive association was found in the AD group between fractional anisotropy and the inner nuclear layer thickness (p < 0.05, r = 0.419, corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling family-wise error rate). Our findings suggest that axonal damage in the brain dominates early on in this condition and shows an association with retinal structural integrity already at initial stages of AD. These findings are consistent with an early axonal degeneration mechanism in AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; diffusion tensor imaging; optical coherence zzm321990tomography; retrograde degeneration; white matter
Year: 2019 PMID: 31282416 PMCID: PMC6700635 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472
CSF biomarker levels of AD patients
| Aβ1–42* ( | Aβ42/Aβ40* ( | Tau* ( | pTau* ( | Tau/Aβ42* ( | Aβ42/pTau* ( | |
| Mean | 510.94 | 0.057 | 445.64 | 63.15 | 0.98 | 9.32 |
| SD | 215.00 | 0.021 | 246.80 | 24.36 | 0.52 | 6.28 |
*Normal values: Aβ42 > 580 pg/mL; Aβ42/Aβ40 > 0.068; Tau < 250 pg/mL; pTau (181) < 37 pg/mL; Tau/Aβ42 < 0.40; Aβ42/pTau > 15.8.
Fig.1Macular image segmentation results, identifying the layers considered for this study. RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer.
Demographics and clinical characteristics of all participants
| HC ( | AD ( | ||
| Age±SD | 63.43±7.53 | 66.47±6.63 | 0.193 |
| Female/Male (ratio) | 11/12 (0.92) | 8/9 (0.89) | 0.962 |
| Education (y) | 9.3±5.93 | 8.95±5.20 | |
| MMSE | 23,1±2.97 | ||
| MoCA | 25.83±3.31 | 14.47±4.51 | |
| CDR | 0 | 1 | – |
| ApoE | 44% |
HC, healthy controls; AD, patients with Alzheimer’s disease; SD, standard deviation; MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination. Data are expressed as mean±S.D, except for ApoE that is expressed as percentage of ɛ4 carriers. MMSE and MoCA: higher scores correspond to better performance. Concerning BLAD affected domains they showed the following ratios of impairment in AD participants: (Memory, 16/17; Executive, 12/17; Language, 7/17; Constructive, 4/17; Calculation, 3/17).
FA, MD, RD. and DA whole-brain values (mean±SD), for all participants
| DTI metric (whole skeleton) | HC ( | AD ( | |
| FA | 0.434±0.024 | 0.441±0.018 | 1.00 |
| MD (×103 mm2/s) | 0.730±0.031 | 0.716±0.047 | 1.00 |
| RD (×103 mm2/s) | 0.550±0.029 | 0.553±0.045 | 1.00 |
| DA (×103 mm2/s) | 1.09±0.040 | 1.04±0.058 |
HC, healthy controls; AD, patients with Alzheimer’s disease; SD, standard deviation; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; DA, axial diffusivity.* p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant (corrected for multiple comparisons by using post-hoc Bonferroni correction for the number of metrics considered).
Fig.2TBSS results for the correlation analysis between FA and INL thickness in the AD group. The results shown are for statistical testing of a positive correlation. Regions with significant correlation (with cluster-based thresholding corrected for multiple comparisons) are displayed in red to yellow. Results are overlaid on the mean WM skeleton (green) and mean FA image (grey). The significant portion of the tracts was dilated by using the “tbss_fill” command in FSL to enhance visualization.
White matter tracts’ FA correlated with INL thickness in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (n = 17), with the largest effects in terms of spatial extent
| WM tracts | Significant voxels (%)** | |
| Body of corpus callosum | 0.033 | 58.67 |
| Tapetum R | 0.042 | 43.24 |
| Posterior corona radiata R | 0.037 | 39.07 |
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule R | 0.040 | 33.12 |
| Posterior thalamic radiation (include optic radiation) L | 0.043 | 31.67 |
| Superior corona radiata R | 0.032 | 30.60 |
| Anterior corona radiata R | 0.028 | 28.81 |
| Splenium of corpus callosum | 0.035 | 26.91 |
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus) L | 0.039 | 22.76 |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus R | 0.043 | 21.11 |
| Superior corona radiata L | 0.037 | 20.35 |
| Genu of corpus callosum | 0.035 | 19.11 |
| Posterior corona radiata L | 0.034 | 18.16 |
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus) R | 0.035 | 16.99 |
| Fornix (cres)/Stria terminalis L | 0.043 | 14.29 |
| Posterior thalamic radiation (include optic radiation) R | 0.041 | 11.85 |
| Posterior limb of internal capsule R | 0.041 | 8.51 |
| Anterior corona radiata L | 0.037 | 8.49 |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus L | 0.043 | 6.17 |
*p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant (corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling for family-wise error rates). **Percentage of statistically significant voxels within each labelled tract.