Literature DB >> 31281989

Differential muscle hypertrophy and edema responses between high-load and low-load exercise with blood flow restriction.

Fabiano Freitas Shiromaru1, Vitor de Salles Painelli1,2, Carla Silva-Batista2,3, Ariel Roberth Longo1, Thiago Lasevicius2, Brad J Schoenfeld4, André Yui Aihara5, Valmor Tricoli2, Bergson de Almeida Peres1, Emerson Luiz Teixeira1,2.   

Abstract

We sought to determine whether early increases in cross-sectional area (CSA) of different muscles composing the quadriceps with low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) were mainly driven by muscle hypertrophy or by edema-induced swelling. We also compared these changes to those promoted by high-load resistance training (HL-RT). In a randomized within-subject design, fifteen healthy, untrained men were submitted to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for CSA and edema-induced muscle swelling assessment (fast spin echo inversion recovery, FSE-STIR). MRI was performed in LL-BFR and HL-RT at baseline (W0) and after 3 weeks (W3), with a further measure after 6 weeks (W6) for HL-RT. Participants were also assessed at these time points for indirect muscle damage markers (range of motion, ROM; muscle soreness, SOR). CSA significantly increased for all the quadriceps muscles, for both LL-BFR and HL-RT at W3 (all P < .05) compared to W0. However, FSE-STIR was elevated at W3 for all the quadriceps muscles only for HL-RT (all P < .0001), not LL-BFR (all P > .05). Significant increases and decreases were shown in SOR and ROM, respectively, for HL-RT in W3 compared to W0 (both P < .05), while these changes were mitigated at W6 compared to W0 (both P > .05). No significant changes in SOR or ROM were demonstrated for LL-BFR across the study. Early increases in CSA with LL-BFR seem to occur without the presence of muscle edema, whereas initial gains obtained by HL-RT were influenced by muscle edema, in addition to muscle hypertrophy.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood flow restriction; muscle damage; muscle mass; muscle swelling; strength

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31281989     DOI: 10.1111/sms.13516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  2 in total

Review 1.  Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training in Tendon Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review on Intervention Parameters, Physiological Effects, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ian Burton; Aisling McCormack
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Commentary: Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Cause Muscle Damage? Commentary on Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Brad J Schoenfeld; Gøran Paulsen; Thomas Bjørnsen; Kristoffer T Cumming; Per Aagaard; Brian C Clark; Truls Raastad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.