| Literature DB >> 31281600 |
Bruno Corrado1, Gianluca Ciardi1, Clemente Servodio Iammarrone1.
Abstract
Pompe disease (PD) is a rare neuromuscular disorder caused by a deficiency of the enzyme acid alpha-glucosidase. There are three forms of PD depending on the age at onset and clinical severity. PD causes involvement of different organ systems, such as the heart, musculoskeletal system, and respiratory system. As of today, enzyme replacement therapy represents the main therapeutic tool for PD. Rehabilitation is an integral part of a multidisciplinary approach to this pathology. The goal of the present review is to find scientific evidence for the rehabilitative approach to PD, with respect to both the infantile- and adult-onset forms. A systematic literature review was made using the following databases: Pubmed, Pedro, Cochrane Library, EDS Base Index, Trip, and Cinhal. Randomized controlled trials or cohort studies with a sample population of at least six subjects were retrieved. The PICO method was used to formulate the clinical query. The search resulted in 1665 articles. Of these, four cohort studies were subjected to the final phase of the review. Three studies regarded inspiratory muscle training with a threshold, while the fourth study analyzed the effectiveness of therapeutic, aerobic, and reinforcement exercises. Inspiratory muscle training with a threshold increases the pressures generated during inhalation. Aerobic exercise is capable of increasing patients' muscular endurance and performance. To date, however, rehabilitative treatment for patients with PD has no validation in evidencebased medicine. Further studies, possibly with a larger sample size and higher quality are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with PD.Entities:
Keywords: Glycogen Storage Disease Type II; Myopathies; Physical Therapy Modalities; Pompe Disease; Rehabilitation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31281600 PMCID: PMC6589625 DOI: 10.4081/ni.2019.7983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Int ISSN: 2035-8385
Evaluation and rehabilitation of PD according to the recommendations by Clinton et al.[27]
| Clinical recommendations |
|---|
| Preliminary assessment with a pulmonologist or cardiologist before performing aerobic exercises or physiotherapy |
| Evaluate 6MWT at time 0 |
| Include in rehabilitation programs walking, treadmill, use of the cyclette, the hydrokinetic therapy, swimming, muscle strengthening |
| Avoid excessively tiring exercises; avoid immobility |
| Give emphasis to aerobic exercises |
| Instruct the patient to monitor heart rate and breathing during exercise |
| Use preventive braces for contractures while the patient is in a wheelchair, and adequate supports when standing |
| Evaluate corrective surgery for scoliosis above 30-40° |
Keyword used for the search.
| Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 | Boolean operator |
|---|---|---|
| Pompe Disease | Physiotherapy | AND/OR |
| Pompe Disease | Rehabilitation | AND/OR |
| Pompe Disease | Management | AND/OR |
| Glycogen Storage Disease Type 2 | Physiotherapy | AND/OR |
| Glycogen Storage Disease Type 2 | Rehabilitation | AND/OR |
| Glycogen Storage Disease Type 2 | Management | AND/OR |
Figure 1.Selection of articles for the review.
Summary of included studies.
| Study | Design | Participants | Intervention | Outcome measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jevnikar | Single Cohort | n = 8 | Exp = ERT +respiratory 45 min/day × 24 months | • MIP, MEP muscle training with threshold |
| • Follow up: 0,3,6,9,12,24 month | ||||
| Smith | Single Cohort | n = 9 | Exp = ERT + respiratory muscle training with PEEP 6/10 active breaths × 4 /day × 3 months | • Inspired tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), inspiratory pressure (PI), inspiratory time (TI), expiratory time (TE) |
| • Borg scale | ||||
| • MIP | ||||
| • Volume, flow and timing compensatory responses to inspiratory loads were evaluated using Threshold training devices | ||||
| • EMG | ||||
| • Follow up =0, 90, 180, 365 day | ||||
| Aslan | Single Cohort | n = 9 | Exp = ERT + respiratory muscle training with threshold 15 min × 2 /day × 8 wk | • MIP, Cough peak flow(PCF) |
| • Forced vital capacity (FVC), FVC/FEV1 | ||||
| • HRQoL (Nottingham Health Profile) | ||||
| • Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index -PSQI). | ||||
| • Follow up = 0, 8,16, 24 wk | ||||
| Van der Berg | Single Cohort | n = 23 | Exp = standardized aerobic, resistance and core stability exercises 3 /wk × 12 wk | • Fatigue severity scale |
| • Serum CK | ||||
| • VO2 max and WMAX) | ||||
| • Ventilator threshold (VT), | ||||
| • Borg scale and 6MWT | ||||
| • Resistance during core stability exercises, | ||||
| • Quick motor function test | ||||
| • DXA | ||||
| • Follow up = 0, 12, 24 wk |
Figure 2.MIP values after threshold training according to Jevnikar[29] and Aslan[31] studies.