Literature DB >> 31281070

Enhancing the value of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies by identifying patients most likely to benefit. A consensus statement from the National Lipid Association.

Jennifer G Robinson1, Manju Bengularu Jayanna2, Alan S Brown3, Karen Aspry4, Carl Orringer5, Edward A Gill6, Anne Goldberg7, Laney K Jones8, Kevin Maki9, Dave L Dixon10, Joseph J Saseen11, Daniel Soffer12.   

Abstract

Acquisition costs and cost-effectiveness have limited access and recommendations to use proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-inhibiting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Recently, prices were reduced by 60% for alirocumab and evolocumab. This statement systematically reviewed subgroup analyses from statin and PCSK9 mAb trials to identify higher risk groups for which PCSK9 mAbs at the new price could be considered a reasonable (<US$100,000 per quality adjusted life year [QALY]) or high (<US$50,000 per QALY) value. In patients at extremely high risk, with a high burden of athersclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD with multiple poorly controlled or adverse risk factors, PCSK9 mAbs can provide reasonable value when low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is ≥70 mg/dL. In patients at very high risk (ASCVD without peripheral arterial disease and lower levels of poorly controlled risk factors), PCSK9 mAbs provide a reasonable value when LDL-C levels are ≥100 mg/dL. High-risk patients (less-extensive ASCVD with well-controlled risk factors) may experience reasonable value when LDL-C levels are ≥130 mg/dL. Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hypercholesterolemia with untreated LDL-C levels ≥220 mg/dL also should experience reasonable or high value from PCSK9 mAbs when LDL-C is ≥100 mg/dL for primary prevention and ≥70 mg/dL for secondary prevention.
Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Ezetimibe; Familial hypercholesterolemia; PCSK9 inhibitors; Secondary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31281070     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lipidol        ISSN: 1876-4789            Impact factor:   4.766


  7 in total

Review 1.  Familial hypercholesterolaemia: evolving knowledge for designing adaptive models of care.

Authors:  Gerald F Watts; Samuel S Gidding; Pedro Mata; Jing Pang; David R Sullivan; Shizuya Yamashita; Frederick J Raal; Raul D Santos; Kausik K Ray
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Ezetimibe in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Fadia Tohme Shaya; Krystal Sing; Robert Milam; Fasahath Husain; Michael A Del Aguila; Miraj Y Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.571

3.  The correlation between lipoprotein(a) elevations and the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in CAD patients with different LDL-C levels.

Authors:  Lijun Zhu; Jiamin Zheng; Beibei Gao; Xiangbo Jin; Ying He; Liang Zhou; Jinyu Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.174

4.  Cost-effectiveness of Ezetimibe plus statin lipid-lowering therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.

Authors:  Akhil Sasidharan; Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; S Sajith Kumar; Kayala Venkata Jagadeesh; Meenakumari Natarajan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Clinical implications of the log linear association between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction: Greatest benefits when LDL-C >100 mg/dl.

Authors:  Jennifer G Robinson; Manju Bengaluru Jayanna; C Noel Bairey Merz; Neil J Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies: an evidence-based review and update.

Authors:  Rasha Kaddoura; Bassant Orabi; Amar M Salam
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2020-08-11

Review 7.  Same evidence, varying viewpoints: Three questions illustrating important differences between United States and European cholesterol guideline recommendations.

Authors:  David I Feldman; Erin D Michos; Neil J Stone; Ty J Gluckman; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Salim S Virani; Roger S Blumenthal
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.