Literature DB >> 31280981

Evaluation of regional variations in length of stay after elective, uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy in North America.

Elsie Gyang Ross1, Matthew W Mell2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate factors affecting regional variation in length of stay (LOS) after elective, uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
METHODS: Data were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database and included patients with complete data who received elective CEA without complications between 2012 and 2017 across 18 regions in North America and 294 centers. The main outcome measure was LOS >1 day after surgery (LOS >1 postoperative day [POD]). Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariable modeling, and mixed-effects general linear modeling, we evaluated whether regional variations in LOS were independent of demographic, clinical, or center-related factors and to what extent these factors accounted for postoperative variation in LOS.
RESULTS: A total of 36,004 patients were included. Mean postprocedure LOS was 1.6 ± 6.6 days. Overall, 24% of patients had an LOS >1 POD. After adjustment for important demographic, clinical, and center-related factors, the region in which a patient was treated independently and significantly affected LOS after elective, uncomplicated CEA. Region and center of treatment accounted for 18% of LOS variation. Demographic, clinical, and surgical factors accounted for another 32% of variation in LOS. Of these factors, postoperative discharge to a facility other than home (odds ratio [OR], 6.3; confidence interval [CI], 5.2-7.6), use of intravenous (IV) vasoactive agents (OR, 3.2; CI, 3-3.4), intraoperative drain placement (OR, 1.4; CI, 1.3-1.55), and female sex (OR, 1.4; CI, 1.3-1.5) were associated with longer LOS. Factors associated with LOS ≤1 POD included preoperative aspirin (OR, 0.88; CI, 0.8-0.96) and statin use (OR, 0.9; CI, 0.83-0.98), high surgeon volume (highest quartile: OR, 0.68; CI, 0.5-0.87), and completion evaluation after CEA (eg, Doppler, ultrasound; OR, 0.87; CI, 0.8-0.95). We also found that use of IV vasoactive medications varied significantly across regions, independent of demographic and clinical factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional variation in LOS exists after elective, uncomplicated CEA even after controlling for a wide range of important factors, indicating that there remain unmeasured causes of longer LOS in some regions. Even so, modification of certain clinical practices may reduce overall LOS. Regional differences in use of IV vasoactive medications not driven by clinical factors warrant further analysis, given the strong association with longer LOS.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stenosis; Clinical practice; Length of stay; Regional variations

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31280981      PMCID: PMC8269949          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.860


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of hospitalization costs and Medicare payments for carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  R J McDonald; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences.

Authors:  Daniel M McNeish
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The need for treatment of hemodynamic instability following carotid endarterectomy is associated with increased perioperative and 1-year morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Tze-Woei Tan; Mohammad H Eslami; Jeffrey A Kalish; Robert T Eberhardt; Gheorghe Doros; Philip P Goodney; Jack L Cronenwett; Alik Farber
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Hospital reimbursement for carotid stenting and endarterectomy.

Authors:  Melissa J Donovan; Daniel E Ramirez; Gregory D Crenshaw; Taylor A Smith; Hernan A Bazan; W Charles Sternbergh
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Can Big Data Fulfill Its Promise?

Authors:  Peter W Groeneveld; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-11-08

6.  Contemporary predictors of extended postoperative hospital length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Karen J Ho; Arin L Madenci; James T McPhee; Marcus E Semel; Richard A Bafford; Louis L Nguyen; C Keith Ozaki; Michael Belkin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Factors that determine the length of stay after carotid endarterectomy represent opportunities to avoid financial losses.

Authors:  Julia Glaser; David Kuwayama; David Stone; Andres Schanzer; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Richard Powell; Andrew Stanley; Brian Nolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Modifiable Factors Leading to Increased Length of Stay after Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  James H Mehaffey; Damien J LaPar; Margret C Tracci; Kenneth J Cherry; John A Kern; Irving Kron; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Challenges of Big Data Analysis.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Fang Han; Han Liu
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 17.275

10.  Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman; E A Draper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.