Patricia Ysabel Condorhuamán-Alvarado1, Teresa Pareja-Sierra2, Angélica Muñoz-Pascual3, Pilar Sáez-López4, Cristina Ojeda-Thies5, Teresa Alarcón-Alarcón6, María Concepción Cassinello-Ogea7, Jose Luis Pérez-Castrillón8, Paloma Gómez-Campelo9, Laura Navarro-Castellanos10, Ángel Otero-Puime11, Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo6. 1. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: patricia.condorhuaman@salud.madrid.org. 2. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain. 3. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital General de Segovia, Segovia, Spain. 4. Unidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. 5. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 6. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. 7. Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain. 8. Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain. 9. IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain. 10. IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera, Madrid, Spain. 11. IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (or Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera, RNFC) is a database of hip fracture patients admitted to Spanish hospitals. Its goals include assessment and continuous improvement of the care process. OBJECTIVES: To (1) establish a series of indicators, (2) evaluate their initial fulfillment, (3) propose quality standards, (4) suggest recommendations to facilitate standards compliance, and (5) monitor the indicators. METHOD: The indicators fulfilled the criteria of (1) evaluating the process or outcome, (2) being clinically relevant for patients, (3) being modifiable through changes in healthcare practice, and (4) being considered important by the RNFC participants. The first quartile obtained by the group of hospitals in each of the respective variables was proposed as the standard. The Indicators Advisory Committee (IAC) elaborated a list of recommendations for each indicator, based on the available evidence. RESULTS: Seven indicators were chosen. These indicators (its baseline compliance vs. the standard to be reached, respectively) were: the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 48h (44% vs. 63%), mobilized the first postoperative day (56% vs. 86%), with antiosteoporotic medication at discharge (32% vs. 61%), with calcium supplements at discharge (46% vs. 77%), with vitamin D supplements at discharge (67% vs. 92%), who developed pressure ulcers during hospitalization (7.2% vs. 2.1%) and with independent mobility at 30 days (58% vs. 70%). The IAC has established 25 recommendations for improving care. CONCLUSION: The indicators and standards chosen are presented, as well as the list of recommendations. This process completes the first step to improve quality of care. The results will be evaluated 6 months after implementing the recommendations.
BACKGROUND: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (or Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera, RNFC) is a database of hip fracturepatients admitted to Spanish hospitals. Its goals include assessment and continuous improvement of the care process. OBJECTIVES: To (1) establish a series of indicators, (2) evaluate their initial fulfillment, (3) propose quality standards, (4) suggest recommendations to facilitate standards compliance, and (5) monitor the indicators. METHOD: The indicators fulfilled the criteria of (1) evaluating the process or outcome, (2) being clinically relevant for patients, (3) being modifiable through changes in healthcare practice, and (4) being considered important by the RNFC participants. The first quartile obtained by the group of hospitals in each of the respective variables was proposed as the standard. The Indicators Advisory Committee (IAC) elaborated a list of recommendations for each indicator, based on the available evidence. RESULTS: Seven indicators were chosen. These indicators (its baseline compliance vs. the standard to be reached, respectively) were: the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 48h (44% vs. 63%), mobilized the first postoperative day (56% vs. 86%), with antiosteoporotic medication at discharge (32% vs. 61%), with calcium supplements at discharge (46% vs. 77%), with vitamin D supplements at discharge (67% vs. 92%), who developed pressure ulcers during hospitalization (7.2% vs. 2.1%) and with independent mobility at 30 days (58% vs. 70%). The IAC has established 25 recommendations for improving care. CONCLUSION: The indicators and standards chosen are presented, as well as the list of recommendations. This process completes the first step to improve quality of care. The results will be evaluated 6 months after implementing the recommendations.
Authors: Cristina González de Villaumbrosia; Pilar Sáez López; Isaac Martín de Diego; Carmen Lancho Martín; Marina Cuesta Santa Teresa; Teresa Alarcón; Cristina Ojeda Thies; Rocío Queipo Matas; Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390