Literature DB >> 31280799

Influence of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton during simulated industrial work tasks on physical load, upper body posture, postural control and discomfort.

Tessy Luger1, Robert Seibt2, Timothy J Cobb2, Monika A Rieger2, Benjamin Steinhilber2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of wearing a passive lower-limb exoskeleton on physical load, kinematics, postural control, and discomfort. 45 healthy males participated and were exposed to three 21-min simulations, including screwing, cable-mounting, and clip-fitting. Each exposure comprised one of three exoskeleton statuses (standing, high and low sitting on exoskeleton) and three working distances (optimal, far, very far). The order of exoskeleton status and working distance were randomized across subjects. A force platform was used to calculate the mean center of pressure (COP) and absolute (SSABS) and relative static postural stability (SSREL) as measures of postural control as well as the weight transferred to the exoskeleton supports as indicator of physical load. Neck and back angles were recorded together with electrical activity of four bilateral muscles (trapezius, erector, vastus, gastrocnemius). Discomfort was recorded before and after each exposure on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Physical load decreased due to the exoskeleton carrying up to 64% of the subject's body mass. The COP remained within the base of support with the lowest values of static postural stability for high sitting (27%). During sitting, vastus activity increased (∼95-135%) while gastrocnemius activity decreased (∼25%) compared to standing. Trapezius and erector activity levels showed only minor differences between exposures. Larger working distances resulted in a more anterior COP and increased erector activity. Standing without exoskeleton was related to less discomfort (0.5) than sitting on the exoskeleton (∼1.3). Working postures and distances changed SSREL and activity levels of the vastus, gastrocnemius, and erector, but not SSABS. However, postural stability did not approach a critical state in our simulations without external perturbations. Therefore, investigating exoskeletons in the field will provide useful information about their effectiveness and usability in dynamic working situations where external forces could occur.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Industrial ergonomics; Manual materials handling; Static postural stability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31280799     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Dynamic Margins of Stability During Robot-Assisted Walking in Able-Bodied Individuals: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Arvind Ramanujam; Kamyar Momeni; Manikandan Ravi; Jonathan Augustine; Erica Garbarini; Peter Barrance; Ann M Spungen; Pierre Asselin; Steven Knezevic; Gail F Forrest
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 3.  EMG Characterization and Processing in Production Engineering.

Authors:  Manuel Del Olmo; Rosario Domingo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Postural Control When Using an Industrial Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Impact of Reaching for a Working Tool and External Perturbation.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Robert Seibt; Monika A Rieger; Tessy Luger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Cooperativity Model for Improving the Walking-Assistance Efficiency of the Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Jianfeng Ma; Decheng Sun; Yongqing Ding; Daihe Luo; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.523

7.  Guidelines for Working Heights of the Lower-Limb Exoskeleton (CEX) Based on Ergonomic Evaluations.

Authors:  Yong-Ku Kong; Chae-Won Park; Min-Uk Cho; Seoung-Yeon Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Dong Jin Hyun; Kihyeon Bae; Jong Kyu Choi; Sang Min Ko; Kyeong-Hee Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.