Harry Levine1, Tyler S Bartholomew1, Victoria Rea-Wilson1, Jason Onugha1, David Jonathon Arriola1, Gabriel Cardenas1, David W Forrest1, Alex H Kral2, Lisa R Metsch3, Emma Spencer4, Hansel Tookes5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14thSt., Miami, FL, 33136, USA. 2. RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA. 3. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, 2970 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA. 4. Bureau of Communicable Diseases, Florida Department of Health, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32399, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14thSt., Miami, FL, 33136, USA. Electronic address: hetookes@med.miami.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Due to the increase in people who use opioids in the US, there has been a steady increase in injection drug use. Without access to safe syringe disposal locations, people who inject drugs (PWID) have few options other than improper disposal, including in public places. In 2016, Florida's first legal Syringe Services Program (SSP) was established in Miami. This study aims to compare syringe disposal practices among PWID before and after the implementation of an SSP. METHODS: Visual inspection walkthroughs of randomly selected census blocks in the neighborhoods in the top quartile of narcotics-related arrests were conducted to assess improperly discarded syringes. Syringe location was geocoded in ArcGIS. Adult PWID pre-SSP (n = 448) and post-SSP (n = 482) implementation were recruited for a survey using respondent-driven sampling in Miami. A Poisson regression model was used to determine the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of improper syringe disposal pre- and post-SSP. RESULTS: A total of 191 syringes/1000 blocks were found post-implementation versus 371/1000 blocks pre-implementation, representing a 49% decrease after SSP implementation. In the surveys, 70% reported any improper syringe disposal post-SSP implementation versus 97% pre-SSP implementation. PWID in the post-implementation survey had 39% lower adjusted relative risk (aRR = 0.613; 95% CI = 0.546, 0.689) of improper syringe disposal as compared to pre-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease in the number of improperly discarded syringes in public in Miami after the implementation of an SSP. Providing PWID with proper disposal venues such as an SSP could decrease public disposal in other communities.
INTRODUCTION: Due to the increase in people who use opioids in the US, there has been a steady increase in injection drug use. Without access to safe syringe disposal locations, people who inject drugs (PWID) have few options other than improper disposal, including in public places. In 2016, Florida's first legal Syringe Services Program (SSP) was established in Miami. This study aims to compare syringe disposal practices among PWID before and after the implementation of an SSP. METHODS: Visual inspection walkthroughs of randomly selected census blocks in the neighborhoods in the top quartile of narcotics-related arrests were conducted to assess improperly discarded syringes. Syringe location was geocoded in ArcGIS. Adult PWID pre-SSP (n = 448) and post-SSP (n = 482) implementation were recruited for a survey using respondent-driven sampling in Miami. A Poisson regression model was used to determine the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of improper syringe disposal pre- and post-SSP. RESULTS: A total of 191 syringes/1000 blocks were found post-implementation versus 371/1000 blocks pre-implementation, representing a 49% decrease after SSP implementation. In the surveys, 70% reported any improper syringe disposal post-SSP implementation versus 97% pre-SSP implementation. PWID in the post-implementation survey had 39% lower adjusted relative risk (aRR = 0.613; 95% CI = 0.546, 0.689) of improper syringe disposal as compared to pre-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease in the number of improperly discarded syringes in public in Miami after the implementation of an SSP. Providing PWID with proper disposal venues such as an SSP could decrease public disposal in other communities.
Authors: Lynn D Wenger; Alexis N Martinez; Lisa Carpenter; Dara Geckeler; Grant Colfax; Alex H Kral Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mohsen Malekinejad; Lisa Grazina Johnston; Carl Kendall; Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr; Marina Raven Rifkin; George W Rutherford Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-06-17
Authors: M C Doherty; R S Garfein; D Vlahov; B Junge; P J Rathouz; N Galai; J C Anthony; P Beilenson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1997-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amy Lansky; Abu S Abdul-Quader; Melissa Cribbin; Tricia Hall; Teresa J Finlayson; Richard S Garfein; Lillian S Lin; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Abu S Abdul-Quader; Jonathan Feelemyer; Shilpa Modi; Ellen S Stein; Alya Briceno; Salaam Semaan; Tara Horvath; Gail E Kennedy; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2013-11
Authors: Tyler S Bartholomew; Hansel E Tookes; Corinne Bullock; Jason Onugha; David W Forrest; Daniel J Feaster Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-03-05
Authors: Sean T Allen; Rebecca Hamilton White; Allison O'Rourke; Kristin E Schneider; Brian W Weir; Gregory M Lucas; Michael E Kilkenny; Susan G Sherman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: David P Serota; Hansel E Tookes; Belén Hervera; Babley M Gayle; Cara R Roeck; Edward Suarez; David W Forrest; Michael A Kolber; Tyler S Bartholomew; Allan E Rodriguez; Susanne Doblecki-Lewis Journal: Ann Med Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 5.348