Literature DB >> 31279843

Replacing tDCS with theta tACS provides selective, but not general WM benefits.

Kevin T Jones1, Hector Arciniega2, Marian E Berryhill2.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) can be improved after repeated training sessions paired with noninvasive neurostimulation techniques. Previously, we reported that WM training paired with tDCS succeeded behaviorally by enhancing anterior-posterior theta phase coherence and reducing alpha power. Here, in two experiments we tested several theta and alpha frequencies and two transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) montages in an effort to shortcut WM training while preserving behavioral gains. In Experiment 1, in separate sessions participants received online tACS at two frequencies derived from the previous study with the respective goal of improving and impairing WM performance. We selected the mean group peak value theta (7 Hz) to benefit WM and alpha (11 Hz) to impair WM. Stimulation (tACS) over right frontoparietal sites (F4-P4) during 3-back WM tasks (object, spatial) produced no behavioral consequences. In Experiment 2 we stimulated at a slower theta frequency (4.5 Hz), which was also significant in our prior study, and tested whether frontoparietal or bifrontal montages would be more effective at improving WM. This experiment revealed selectively improved object WM after right frontoparietal tACS alone. In summary, one session of tACS failed to produce the magnitude or breadth of WM gains observed after 4-10 tDCS-WM training sessions. In short, despite looking for loopholes we found little tACS savings.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha; Theta; Working memory; tACS; tDCS

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279843     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  5 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kevin T Jones; Avery E Ostrand; Wan-Yu Hsu; Richard Campusano; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.184

3.  Research outside the laboratory: Longitudinal at-home neurostimulation.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Carson C Smith; Adam Gazzaley; Theodore P Zanto
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Rabea Sobirey; David Haslacher; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-05-07

Review 5.  Working Memory and Transcranial-Alternating Current Stimulation-State of the Art: Findings, Missing, and Challenges.

Authors:  Wiam Al Qasem; Mohammed Abubaker; Eugen Kvašňák
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.