Literature DB >> 31279647

Angioplasty with versus without routine stent placement for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Qiuhe Wang1, Kai Li1, Chuangye He1, Xulong Yuan1, Bohan Luo1, Xingshun Qi1, Wengang Guo1, Wei Bai1, Tianlei Yu1, Jiahao Fan1, Zhengyu Wang1, Jie Yuan1, Xiaomei Li1, Ying Zhu1, Na Han1, Jing Niu1, Yong Lv1, Lei Liu1, Jing Li1, Shihao Tang1, Shuai Guo1, Enxing Wang1, Dongdong Xia1, Zhexuan Wang1, Hongwei Cai2, Jianhong Wang3, Zhanxin Yin1, Jielai Xia4, Daiming Fan5, Guohong Han6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty recanalisation is recommended as the first-line interventional procedure for Budd-Chiari syndrome, but subsequent restenosis is common. We aimed to test whether use of routine, non-selective stenting in angioplasty could improve patency and treatment efficacy with adequate safety in Budd-Chiari syndrome.
METHODS: We did a randomised controlled trial, for which patients aged 18-75 years with Budd-Chiari syndrome with membranous obstruction or short-length stenosis (≤4 cm), and a Child-Pugh score of less than 13 were considered eligible. Patients were excluded if they had obstruction not amenable to angioplasty, were recommended to be treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation, or had contraindications for angioplasty. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to an angioplasty-only group or an angioplasty plus routine stenting group, with use of a web-based allocation system (Pocock and Simon's minimisation method, stratified by obstruction features and Child-Pugh score). Recanalisation procedures were done within 24 h of randomisation. The statistician and investigators responsible for data collection data and endpoint assessment were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients free of restenosis, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02201485) and is completed.
FINDINGS: Between July 28, 2014, and Sept 29, 2017, 88 (59%) of 150 screened patients were enrolled and assigned either the angioplasty-only group (n=45) or the angioplasty plus routine stenting group (n=43). During a median follow-up period of 27 months (IQR 19-41), the angioplasty plus routine stenting group had significantly higher proportion of patients free of restenosis (42 [98%] of 43 patients) than did the angioplasty-only group (27 [60%] of 45 patients; p<0·0001). In the survival analysis, 3-year restenosis-free survival was 96·0% (95% CI 88·6-100·0) in the routine stenting group versus 60·4% (46·4-78·7) in the angioplasty-only group (log-rank p<0·0001). The hazard ratio for restenosis was 0·04 (95% CI 0·01-0·31) in favour of routine stenting, with an absolute risk reduction of 35·6% (95% CI 24·2-55·0). Two (5%) patients in the angioplasty plus routine stenting group and one (2%) patient in the angioplasty-only group died during follow-up. One (2%) patient from the angioplasty plus routine stenting group had puncture site haematoma, which was not related to stenting. No stent fracture or migration occurred. Anticoagulation-related adverse events occurred in five (11%) patients from angioplasty alone group and five (12%) patients from angioplasty plus routine stenting group.
INTERPRETATION: Routine stenting with angioplasty is superior to angioplasty alone for preventing restenosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome with short-length stenosis and is safe to use as part of first-line invasive treatment. Further validation is needed in similar settings and other regions in which different characteristics of Budd-Chiari syndrome are more prevalent. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Technology R&amp;D Programme, Optimised Overall Project of Shaanxi Province, Boost Programme of Xijing Hospital.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279647     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30177-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clots in unusual places: lots of stress, limited data, critical decisions.

Authors:  Carol Mathew; Marc Zumberg
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Budd-Chiari syndrome: consensus guidance of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL).

Authors:  Akash Shukla; Ananta Shreshtha; Amar Mukund; Chhagan Bihari; C E Eapen; Guohong Han; Hemant Deshmukh; Ian Homer Y Cua; Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana; Mamun Al Meshtab; Masayoshi Kage; Roongruedee Chaiteeraki; Sombat Treeprasertsuk; Suprabhat Giri; Sundeep Punamiya; Valerie Paradis; Xingshun Qi; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Zaigham Abbas; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 3.  State of the Art, Current Perspectives, and Controversies of Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Review.

Authors:  Paschalis Gavriilidis; Gabriele Marangoni; Jawad Ahmad; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Budd-Chiari Syndrome during Long-term Follow-up after Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation.

Authors:  Yusuke Akitomi; Yoshinari Asaoka; Ryo Miura; Sae Murata; Takatsugu Yamamoto; Haruko Tashiro; Naoki Shirafuji; Kentaro Yamada; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Kondo; Atsushi Tanaka
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.282

5.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: feasibility and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Aboelyazid Elkilany; Mohamed Alwarraky; Timm Denecke; Dominik Geisel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  An Update on the Management of Budd-Chiari Syndrome.

Authors:  A Sharma; S N Keshava; A Eapen; E Elias; C E Eapen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.