Literature DB >> 31279565

Enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine using electroporation and intradermal delivery.

Maya Williams1, Dan Ewing2, Maria Blevins3, Peifang Sun2, Appavu K Sundaram2, Kanakatte S Raviprakash2, Kevin R Porter4, John W Sanders3.   

Abstract

Phase 1 clinical trials with a DNA vaccine for dengue demonstrated that the vaccine is safe and well tolerated, however it produced less than optimal humoral immune responses. To determine if the immunogenicity of the tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine could be enhanced, we explored alternate, yet to be tested, methods of vaccine administration in non-human primates. Animals were vaccinated on days 0, 28 and 91 with either a low (1 mg) or high (5 mg) dose of vaccine by the intradermal or intramuscular route, using either needle-free injection or electroporation devices. Neutralizing antibody, IFN-γ T cell and memory B cell responses were compared to a high dose group vaccinated with a needle-free intramuscular injection delivery device similar to what had been used in previous preclinical and clinical studies. All previously untested vaccination methodologies elicited improved immune responses compared to the high dose needle-free intramuscular injection delivery group. The highest neutralizing antibody responses were observed in the group that was vaccinated with the high dose formulation via intradermal electroporation. The highest IFN-γ T cell responses were also observed in the high dose intradermal electroporation group and the CD8+ T cells were the dominant contributors for the IFNγ response. Memory B cells were detected for all four serotypes. More than a year after vaccination, groups were challenged with dengue-1 virus. Both the low and high dose intradermal electroporation groups had significantly fewer days of dengue-1 virus RNAemia compared to the control group. The results from this study demonstrate that using either an electroporation device and/or the intradermal route of delivery increases the immune response generated by this vaccine in non-human primates and should be explored in humans.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA vaccine; Dengue; Electroporation; Intradermal

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279565     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

Review 1.  Controlled Human Infection Models To Accelerate Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Robert K M Choy; A Louis Bourgeois; Christian F Ockenhouse; Richard I Walker; Rebecca L Sheets; Jorge Flores
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 50.129

2.  A DNA vaccine candidate delivered by an electroacupuncture machine provides protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Tsai-Teng Tzeng; Kit Man Chai; Kuan-Yin Shen; Chia-Yi Yu; Shiu-Ju Yang; Wan-Chun Huang; Hung-Chun Liao; Fang-Feng Chiu; Horng-Yunn Dou; Ching-Len Liao; Hsin-Wei Chen; Shih-Jen Liu
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 9.399

3.  Enhanced Immunogenicity of Inactivated Dengue Vaccines by Novel Polysaccharide-Based Adjuvants in Mice.

Authors:  Shuenn-Jue Wu; Dan Ewing; Appavu K Sundaram; Hua-Wei Chen; Zhaodong Liang; Ying Cheng; Vihasi Jani; Peifang Sun; Gregory D Gromowski; Rafael A De La Barrera; Megan A Schilling; Nikolai Petrovsky; Kevin R Porter; Maya Williams
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Induction of a local muscular dystrophy using electroporation in vivo: an easy tool for screening therapeutics.

Authors:  Aline Derenne; Alexandra Tassin; Thuy Hang Nguyen; Estelle De Roeck; Vincianne Jenart; Eugénie Ansseau; Alexandra Belayew; Frédérique Coppée; Anne-Emilie Declèves; Alexandre Legrand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Vaccination into the Dermal Compartment: Techniques, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Johanna Hettinga; Robert Carlisle
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 6.  Ocular Manifestations of Emerging Arthropod-Borne Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Nesrine Abroug; Molka Khairallah; Sourour Zina; Imen Ksiaa; Hager Ben Amor; Sonia Attia; Bechir Jelliti; Sana Khochtali; Moncef Khairallah
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-22

7.  Tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine is not immunogenic when delivered by retrograde infusion into salivary glands.

Authors:  Guy El Helou; Todd A Ponzio; Joseph F Goodman; Maria Blevins; David L Caudell; Kanakatte S Raviprakash; Daniel Ewing; Maya Williams; Kevin R Porter; John W Sanders
Journal:  Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines       Date:  2020-06-03

8.  Immunogenicity of Adjuvanted Psoralen-Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein DNA Vaccines in BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Appavu K Sundaram; Daniel Ewing; Zhaodong Liang; Vihasi Jani; Ying Cheng; Peifang Sun; Kanakatte Raviprakash; Shuenn-Jue Wu; Nikolai Petrovsky; Gabriel Defang; Maya Williams; Kevin R Porter
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Cytokine Adjuvants IL-7 and IL-15 Improve Humoral Responses of a SHIV LentiDNA Vaccine in Animal Models.

Authors:  Laury-Anne Leroy; Alice Mac Donald; Aditi Kandlur; Deepanwita Bose; Peng Xiao; Jean Gagnon; François Villinger; Yahia Chebloune
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17

10.  Adapting Rapid Diagnostic Tests to Detect Historical Dengue Virus Infections.

Authors:  Fernando Echegaray; Peter Laing; Samantha Hernandez; Sully Marquez; Amanda Harris; Ian Laing; Adam Chambers; Neil McLennan; Victor A Sugiharto; Hua-Wei Chen; Sandra Vivero Villagran; Abigail Collingwood; Magelda Montoya; Fausto Bustos Carrillo; Mark P Simons; Philip J Cooper; Andrea Lopez; Gabriel Trueba; Joseph Eisenberg; Shuenn-Jue Wu; William Messer; Eva Harris; Josefina Coloma; Leah C Katzelnick
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.